Ok, as requested. I looked at @SKeshel analysis, which I will thread here.
All in all, pretty basic stuff. A lot of "this looks weird therefore it must be fraud."
1/*
All in all, pretty basic stuff. A lot of "this looks weird therefore it must be fraud."
1/*
https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1435246934726529026
Report starts with "Number of disputed ballots." Disputed by whom? There has been a ton of unsubstantiated speculation in this area with literally zero empirical evidence brought forth by those claiming disputed ballots.
2/*
2/*
Non-Citizen voters:
Keshel claims to have a survey of voters by Trump's legal team for the estimate of 36k to 237k non-citizens (that MoE).
They then go after the "fed-only" which was .4% of cast ballots in Maricopa (8,114). Here's how they broke
3/*
Keshel claims to have a survey of voters by Trump's legal team for the estimate of 36k to 237k non-citizens (that MoE).
They then go after the "fed-only" which was .4% of cast ballots in Maricopa (8,114). Here's how they broke
3/*
Statistical anomalous vote dumps:
This is a basic analysis of the @nytimes feed with election day circled (AZ processes EVs prior to election day). Had they analyzed the cast vote record, they would find these anomalies.
Here you go guys, you're welcome.
4/*
This is a basic analysis of the @nytimes feed with election day circled (AZ processes EVs prior to election day). Had they analyzed the cast vote record, they would find these anomalies.
Here you go guys, you're welcome.
4/*
Highly secretive ballot harvesting operation:
Based off an eye witness security guy, they are claiming not just harvesting, but literal ballot fraud. I will have a separate thread dedicated to how absurd this claim is because of the nearly infinite complexity of what is needed.
Based off an eye witness security guy, they are claiming not just harvesting, but literal ballot fraud. I will have a separate thread dedicated to how absurd this claim is because of the nearly infinite complexity of what is needed.
So now, Seth's actual report for Arizona. The wording of this report continually leads the reader to what they think is fraud. Maricopa is a big county that has exploded in growth, so he uses raw numbers a lot because they are big.
electionfraud20.org/seth-keshel-re…
electionfraud20.org/seth-keshel-re…
Keshel leads with a chart for Maricopa looking at D growth in the county between 16-20. But @EvanMcMullin did quite well in Maricopa. He was not on the ballot in 20, so many of these people went to Biden. Also, 1988 was largest D gain as a percent (49%)
In fact, looking at the same numbers...2016-2020 changes are big, but not the largest. That belongs to 2000-2004.
reg. changes:
04: +27%
20: +20%
vote changes:
04: +33%
20: +30%
R gains:
04: +42%
20: +33%
D gains:
04: +31%
20: +48%
reg. changes:
04: +27%
20: +20%
vote changes:
04: +33%
20: +30%
R gains:
04: +42%
20: +33%
D gains:
04: +31%
20: +48%
Ironically, one county that Keshel deems as "clean" has even more drastic changes. Pinal. This (now) R county was +60% registration and +63% voting in 00-04. In 16-20: +31% and +42% respectively.
R voting at top of ticket is up +432% in Pinal 00-20
Maricopa +107%
R voting at top of ticket is up +432% in Pinal 00-20
Maricopa +107%
Final summary. This is a basic analysis that anyone on #ElectionTwitter can do in a day. The difference is that to lead people to the fraud conclusion, numbers are presented in integers, as well as cherry picked.
All it does show is a growing state and a paradigm shift candidate
All it does show is a growing state and a paradigm shift candidate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
