Reading legislation is NOT fun. Reading formulas in leg text is much worse (why cant we just use algebra?).
So here's a plain English (I hope) explanation of what the Clean Electricity Performance Program from House Energy & Commerce (Subtitle D: energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press…) says...
CEPP creates a grant program for suppliers of retail electricity that achieve a 4% year on year increase in the share of clean electricity used to supply their customers.
It also collects a payment from suppliers of retail electricity that fall short of 4% YoY ⬆️ in clean share
"Clean electricity" in this bill means any source of electricity that produces less than 0.1 tons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions per MWh of electricity generated.
A supplier of "end use" electricity means any entity that generates/purchases electricity and sells/resells it to an electricity consumer. Could be competitive retailer, legacy distribution utility as default supplier, vertically integrated utility, or public utility (coop/muni).
Formula for grants paid by the Dept of Energy to qualifying suppliers that increase clean share YoY by 4% or more is:
$150/MWh x (YoY % increase in clean share - 1.5%) x total sales to end-use customers (retail sales).
Ex: 5% growth = $150/MWh x 3.5% x total retail sales.
Formula for payments collected by the Dept of Energy from suppliers that fall short of a 4% YoY growth in clean share is:
$40/MWh x (4% - YoY % increase in clean share) x total sales to end-use customers (retail sales).
Ex: 3% growth = $40/MWh x 1% x total retail sales.
Additionally, any electricity supplier that makes a payment to DOE for falling short in one year will have the threshold to qualify for payments in the next year increase by the amount of the shortfall.
Ex: 3% growth = next year (1% shortfall), 5% growth to qualify for payment.
The program starts in 2023 and runs to 2030 (with payments in 2031 for progress made in 2030).
The 1st year is special: 2023 progress is scored against average clean share in 2019 and 2020 as baseline to start progress. Every supplier "starts the race" at their historical level
Exception: A supplier that is >85% clean is exempt from paying any payments for failing to increase clean share by 4 percentage points year on year. They still need to increase by 4% or more to qualify for grants.
Finally, an electricity supplier can elect to defer tallying up of their performance over a 2 or 3 year period. Performance thresholds increase accordingly. Ex: 2 year period means average of clean share over 2 years has to be 8% higher than two years prior.
This deferal program provides multi-year flexibility allows smoothing out year-by-year variation in demand, wind/solar, hydro, nuclear etc.
Ex: Supplier w/2% growth 1 yr, instead of paying payment on 2% shortfall, can defer & achieve ~6% growth next yr & avoid payment/get grants
I think that's it. The gist at least. There are some details on what electricity suppliers have to do/submit to DOE to qualify etc. But that's the core of it.
No commentary here (ask me on Monday). Just a hopefully plain English explanation of what the legislation says.
Here is a section by section summary of what's in draft tax package from the House Ways & Means Cmte: waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrat…
(Part of it anyway, related to Infrastructure Financing, Green Energy, Social Safety Net, and Prescription Drugs)
First off, the clean electricity tax credits are now structured with strong incentives to pay good wages, train apprentice skilled workers, and use domestic produced iron, steel & manufactured content.
To get full tax credit values (referred to as "bonus rate"), projects must pay prevailing wages & use certain percentage of labor hours from qualified apprentice workers. Otherwise, tax credit value is only 1/5th of full value (referred to as "base" rate).
In short: to meet the cost & performance targets identified in our research, LDES techs need:
1. Ultra-low energy capacity costs (~$1-10 per kilowatt-hour the device is capable of storing) 2. Suitably high efficiency (particularly for discharge) 3. >100 hrs sustained discharge.
“This is a budget-based strategy as opposed to a regulatory-based strategy,” Sen. @TinaSmithMN on a Reconciliation-friendly Clean Electricity Standard that is part of the Budget framework agreed on by @SenateBudget Dems yesterday. More via @bstorroweenews.net/articles/payme… & 🧵
Broad contours of a Reconciliation-friendly Clean Electricity Standard (CES) are now coming into public view, as House & Senate Dems prepare a $3.5T Budget Resolution that will kick off a Reconciliation process, which permits passage of budget-related measures w/50+ Senate votes.
There are many important details to be worked out + negotiations must secure support of all 50 Senate Democrats to ensure passage, but Sen. @TinaSmithMN, who has championed this key clean energy measure, and a Budget Cmte outline of the $3.5T plan have revealed broad outlines...
DOE's new "Earthshot" aims to drop the cost of "long duration" storage 90% below cost of current Lithium ion batteries, the dominant grid storage option today, by 2030.
Lazard pegs cost of large 100s MWh scale Li-ion installations at $163-309/kWh so DOE target is ~$15-30/kWh.
And by "long duration", DOE means any technology technically and economically suited to >10 hours of sustained discharge.
Those targets for both duration and cost will move the needle, but based on our research, they are probably not aggressive enough.
Today's big news: @POTUS & a bipartisan group of Senators have "struck a deal" on an infrastructure package. apnews.com/article/biden-… That has many asking, What does this mean for #cleanenergy & #climateaction? tl/dr: There's now a narrow path to victory. Here's what it looks like
There's now a "two-step dance" to get both a bipartisan infrastructure bill + a party-line budget reconciliation through Congress. The former has key energy RD&D wins in it, and the latter is key to drive big emissions cuts in 2020s. Pelosi says it's all or nothing: both or none.
Pelosi today said "There ain’t going to be a bipartisan bill without a reconciliation bill."
Wyden & other senators have been clear they wont vote for infra. bill without an agreement amongst all 50 Democrats on reconciliation that has climate priorities
This #heatdome heading for West Coast looks intense. Residents should have a plan to stay cool if power goes out. Extreme temps are dangerous and mean blackouts are given drought constrained hydro output and peak electricity demand across most of Western google.com/amp/s/gizmodo.…
Extreme temps are projected from the Yukon to Los Angeles, meaning there won't be places with much spare electricity capacity. And a "megadrought" had already severely curtailed the region's important hydropower output & wind power can drop during high pressure fronts too.
Be safe and plan ahead. Full tank of gas, plenty of water, and given lightning risk, maybe pack a fire "go bag" too.
I hate it but this is going to get more and more common. Climate change means this is one of the coolest summers we're likely to experience in our lives. 😟