#Elxn44 Once upon a time, I was walking at night with the man who is now my husband. Suddenly he grabs my arm and shoves me behind him. "Rude much?" was basically my first thought. Then I saw the guy across the street waving a gun around. And I knew this man was a keeper. 1/12
There was no one else around and it was a dark street in an unsavory part of Montreal. The guy was tweaking on something and, although he pointed the gun at us, shouted at us, he was in his own headspace and eventually shuffled off, shouting at things we couldn't see. 2/12
But the fact that this man, my man, put himself between me and the gun, profoundly impressed me. Don't get me wrong. I would have done the same for him, had I seen the guy first. Except he's a foot taller than me so I am not a very effective shield. 3/12
When you really care, when you really love, you don't even think about putting yourself in harm's way to protect those you care about. There is nothing else to do. It's not like there are options. 4/12
And that memory came up as I heard Justin Trudeau defend his defense of Sophie when the protestor said terrible, misogynistic, crude things about her. And, unlike us, Trudeau was surrounded by security. And the guy was throwing words around, and not waving a gun. 5/12
But I recognized the intensity of his response and the intensity in his voice when he says in the interview, "He went after my family. He said hateful misogynistic things about my wife." 6/12 ctvnews.ca/politics/feder…
I have been impressed by Trudeau's ideas about equality, about fairness, by his openness to be out among "the people", probably driving his security detail nuts. By his vision for a Canada that is welcoming, inclusive, and kind. By his commitment to reconciliation, 7/12
Because, despite his detractors, his government has done more to end boil water advisories and respect Indigenous people than any government for as long as I can recall (which is longer that I like to admit). 8/12
I have been impressed by him, and by his ideals. But this incident reveals a far more human level of who Justin Trudeau is. He is passionate about his family. He cannot tolerate any threat to his wife. Nor should he. 9/12
He has had words and accusations thrown at him since he won the election in 2015. More recently, he has had gravel thrown at him. And he lets it all bounce off. But you attack his family and you see a different side of him. 10/12
The things he loves are his family and Canada. I want that guy representing us on the world stage. I believe he will defend us. This is a man who does not tolerate attacks on what he cares about and what he believes in. It's not wrong to stand up to bullies. 11/12
It's not wrong to defend against attacks on what is deeply in your heart. I do not see that level of passion in any of the other party leaders. I do hope, if you are undecided, you choose the guy that feels & cares deeply, & puts himself out there for what he believes in. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A little while ago on the radio I heard a reporter berating Justin Trudeau for lashing out at a protestor who verbally attacked Sophie Trudeau. The reporter seemed to want him to be remorseful for his anger. He was not. "Good for him!" I say. 1/8 ctvnews.ca/politics/feder…
Apparently this protestor called Mme Trudeau something so awful none of the news media can bring themselves to say it or even reference it with a letter (and we know they can say "N-word" as a stand in for another slur). 2/8
And yet, this reporter thought it was inappropriate for him to defend his wife? I have not a shadow of a doubt that, had he not responded, the CPC would have been all over it, saying he was weak or that he didn't care about his family. 3/8
What on earth is this? Do people actually tune in somewhere to watch a quite unremarkable suburban couple chit-chatting over beers in their backyard? If I didn't know who they were, and if it was entertaining, I would guess it was a 22 Minutes sketch. Oh, wait... 1/5
O'Toole isn't going to resurrect Harper's ego channel if he's elected is he? You remember that? Where the CPC spent our public money on a YouTube production where we got to watch the former PM eat his breakfast, alone, in his kitchen? 2/5
You probably don't remember that. Only about 7 people ever watched, and I only remember because I was so irked that he was using public money for his ego-trip. 3/5
Can you trust Erin O'Toole and the CPC to do the right things for Canadians? He promises the gun lobby to roll back gun restrictions to pre-1977 levels and then says he will maintain the Liberal restrictions to the general public. 1/
He says he is pro-choice, but allows his caucus to introduce and vote for anti-choice bills. And he has backing from pro-choice groups. 2/
He says he is progressive about LGBTQ issues, as if that should even be needed in 2021, but allows his caucus to vote against banning conversion therapy. 3/
This will not come as a huge surprise to many Albertans. The UCP's slush fund... I mean War Room... I mean Canadian Energy Centre Ltd - that corporation set up by the UCP to suck $30 million dollars a year out of Alberta's economy... 1/5 albertapolitics.ca/2021/09/albert…
without allowing anyone to see where the money is going - has been paying for advertising, etc for the CPC this federal election, without being registered as a third party under Canada's Elections Act. 2/5
Also, there is the not insignificant ethical and moral sketchiness of Albertans' tax money going to pay for promoting a particular political party which not all Albertans support. 3/5
There are >16,000 active cases of #COVID & close to 700 people in hospital with COVID in Alberta as of yesterday, 169 of whom are in ICUs. The UCP contract tracing is a joke. Kenney wouldn't let us use the federal app. AB Health got overwhelmed and quit tracing for awhile. 1/4
We really need to start thinking of things like a place to live, personal security, food, healthcare, medication if needed, quality education, as human rights, not rewards for being some sort of model worker. 1/10
We have been trapped in the bizarre notion that people's value is entirely based on their ability to contribute to the wealth of a very few. Is that really a valid ideology? 2/10
Some vestigial morality, or maybe the fear of public outcry, is all that prevents some from calling for the elimination of the "unproductive". But maybe you can let a virus or opioid crisis take care of that, right Doug Ford and Jason Kenney? 3/10