What have we learned, what have done in the ten years since #OccupyWallStreet first raised attention to growing inequalities in incomes and wealth?
This thread reflects on a series of decade-old posts I wrote to communicate important facts and policy lessons from good economics.
10 years ago a @globeandmail columnist wrote
"our system redistributes the wealth ... from middle-class workers in the private sector to inefficient and expensive unions in the public sector. Among the biggest beneficiaries of this redistribution is the higher-education industry"
So in my first post I pit Margaret Wente against @MarkJCarney to suggest a first lesson: park your ideology and focus on good economics to recognize the problem and offer effective policy options.
But how to interpret the fact that top end inequality was on the rise. There's a justification that top one percenters are more talented and merit their incomes and wealth.
Occupiers need to understand this logic to assess in what measure it is true.
Ten years ago, when #OccupyWallStreet hit the streets, knowledgeable economists accurately diagnosed the challenges, and offered effective policy options, many of which have yet to be put into place.
Reflecting on ten years since #OccupyWallStreet suggests that the policy challenges are not for lack of good diagnosis, and sensible options, they are political.
Today's Occupiers should frame the discourse in three ways:
1. emphasize luck not merit in the determination of incomes
2. promote tax fairness and eliminate preferential treatment of capital income
3. promote inclusive growth in which income distribution is linked to growth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was gifted the first volume of @BarackObama memoir , and read it in four days.
Well, #APromisedLand solved a mystery for me, and raised the importance of a couple of things that I didn't fully appreciate about how we choose our leaders, and how they govern.
I have often wondered about this short 2014 newspaper clipping in which the reporter writing of @BarackObama taking a walk confesses:
"We have no idea why Obama referred to himself as 'the bear'."
Why indeed? The mystery is solved in the first pages of #APromisedLand .
"Bar", short for "Barry", @BarackObama's childhood family nickname is pronounced "Bear." Go figure. He carried this with him all his life, as quite naturally we all would.
But his mother asks him "Which kind of person do you want to be?"
I set up my website in November 2011, and have been posting articles regularly ever since, though with less frequency lately.
Thank you for being one of my readers, for using the information, and for giving me comments and feedback.
Here is a thread on the top ten posts of 2020
The 10th most popular post on my site in 2020 was one of a series that summarized the major messages of my co-authored publication on social mobility in Canada and the United States
Here's what appears to be @OECD source for these @PierrePoilievre statements, which refer to September 2020 unemployment rates
(9 % for Canada and 7.9 % for US)
.@OECD is great for getting comparable statistics, and the unemployment rate is both an important headline indicator but also a tricky one because there are differences in how accepted definitions are operationalized by different statistical agencies
A "Basic Income" means different things to different people.
At one end there is the @believeinsomeon unconditional cash transfer to selected homeless individuals: should benefits be delivered in-kind with conditions, or as cash with no strings attached?
.@StatCan_eng senior researcher René Morissette has written two very interesting papers on jobs, wages, and work-related benefits, offering insights and a backdrop that will inform our understanding of post #COVID19 jobs.
"at least one-half of long tenure displaced men and women aged 25 to 54 saw their real earnings decline by at least 10% from the year before job loss to five years after job loss."
In one hour @StatCan_eng will release the jobs numbers.
They will refer to one particular week in March, from Sunday the 15th to Saturday the 21st, and are a one-week picture, just a single frame in a movie that has now been running for more than a month.
The employment numbers will be an obvious headline, and there will also be a big jump in unemployment, but both of these statistics needed to be rounded out to capture the full extent of the #COVID19 fallout
.@StatCan_eng classifies someone as "employed" if they have at least one hour of paid work in an employer-employee relationship (self-employment aside), so reductions in hours of work, don't reflected in the employment totals