🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺🎓🚌🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🎓🚌🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨IT’S OUT: my latest #brexit briefing.
School trips to Britain put at risk by EU passport rule change via @FT tl;dr…stopping EU kids using ID cards will help erode U.K. bond with EU warn travel groups. 😢
@FT This is one of those stories where the impact of #Brexit is not quantified in £s or euros...but in the gradual building up of barriers between the EU and the UK.
In this case, stopping use of EU ID cards for travel into UK...which will hit EU school trips /2
@FT It might not seem like a big deal, requiring everyone has a passport to enter UK, but in practice companies that organise school trips -- one of the cheapest and earlies forms of cultural exposure -- say it will hit them hard/3
@FT They wrote to @BorisJohnson in April warning of the impact -- since in many countries like France and Germany the policy is 'all go or no go'...so if one kid has only an ID card, or a non-EU kid that needs a visa...then, unless they get passport/visas the class can't go/4
@FT@BorisJohnson The EU had a “List of Travellers” scheme to enable non-EU children to travel with their group without a visa. That’s been stopped by the Home Office too.
The reason? Security apparently. EU ID cards are not secure. /5
@FT@BorisJohnson But as Antoine Bretin, @antoinebretin the youth stays director at the language exchange group Verdié Hello @VerdieHello and cosignatory of the letter observed in exasperation to the Briefing, “you don’t get many terrorists travelling in school groups”. /6
@FT@BorisJohnson@antoinebretin@VerdieHello And the reality is that people -- like goods and services -- take the line of least resistance. It's not as if there are not plenty inside the EU -- Florence, Madrid, Vienna, Paris ...all make a good school trip destination. /7
@FT@BorisJohnson@antoinebretin@VerdieHello There will be as Susan Jones of @Linguastay_RP_C explains a financial cost to this... families that host kids, tourism destinations (that take about 50% of trip spend) will all feel a bit. /8
But it's the cultural cost. ONS reckons trade will be 15% down long term...so what does a 15% hit to cultural exchange means....over the longer term, in terms of understanding, exposure and contacts with the near-neighbourhood? Who knows. But it's got to be negative/9
Labour Peer Philip Hunt thought it was a “depressing advert for global Britain” that he felt to be “shortsighted . . . petty and mean-spirited”.... I guess some will think it's the plan, but @BorisJohnson
has always said we're leaving the EU, not Europe/10 parliamentlive.tv/event/index/e7…
@BorisJohnson But these policies -- the Home Office is implacable it will not look at exemptions for U18s -- will have that effect. They'll see put barriers with the UK's neighbourhood...to what effect, we'll have to wait and see. ENDS
This relates to Article 22 of GDPR, the EU data protection regulation which guarantees a human review of automated decision or profiling -- for EG online loan award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test using algorithms to filter candidates. /2
NEW: UK is about to extend "grace periods" for NI Protocol that has caused so much difficulty since #Brexit -- EU side will not object -- so that talks on UK Command Paper can continue....BUT (to be clear) two sides still miles apart /1
So, take Lord Frost @DavidGHFrost speech at weekend (worth reading)... he repeats that “solutions which involve ‘flexibilities’ within the current rules won’t work for us”. But that is exactly where the EU is.../2
“We don’t really see the case for renegotiating it [the protocol] so soon, we think most of the solutions can be found within the existing agreement.” /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇬🇧🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇧🇬🇧🚨🚨UK proposal to rewrite section of Brexit deal wins lawyers’ backing - my latest via @FT with @PickardJE. It’s about Article 10, and why it’s arguably obsolete. Heralds battles to come.
@FT@PickardJE This is an interesting intervention from @GeorgePeretzQC and @jamesrwebber
that runs rule over the demand from @DavidGHFrost
last july that Article 10 of the NI Protocol should be replaced/re-written. Their full text is here..but tl;dr /2
@FT@PickardJE@GeorgePeretzQC@jamesrwebber@DavidGHFrost Article 10 is that part of the Protocol on state aid which means that UK Govt subsidy decisions that could impact on NI goods trade need to be referred to Brussels...even if those decision are primarily for UK economy. Understandably Brexiters hate it. /3
🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧💉🏥🔬🧬🧪🧫🇪🇺🚛🚨🚨My latest #Brexit Briefing is out. And it looks at “regulatory science” and the “real opportunity of Brexit”…which might not quite be what is commonly understood. via @FT Stay with me/1 ft.com/content/19af24…
@FT It has been one of the long-running themes of #Brexit that the UK, freed of the stultifying regulatory dead hand of Brussels, can prosper by being 'nimbler' and more 'innovative' and in, simple terms, slashing 'red tape'...which makes for a strong political narrative. BUT.../2
@FT It comes up against some uncomfortable facts, which is that the UK (4pc, say of total global spending on medical devices) really isn't big enough to make the regulatory weather...global industries like pharma, finance etc have to follow EU, US standards to monetize products/3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺💉💊💉💊💉💊🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨 EXC: Staff at UK medical regulator MHRA express alarm at plan to slash 300 of 1,200 jobs after #brexit — despite #covid19 triumphs and U.K. gov wanting life sciences at heart of economic recovery. 🤔🤔🤔stay with me/1 ft.com/content/8ef390…
Yes, that's the same MHRA regulator that stopped the #Covid19 ventilator programme descending into farce and helped fast-track coronavirus vaccines approvals -- for which it was lauded as "phenomenal" in UK govt's life sciences plan./2
And the same MHRA that Iain Duncan Smith in this TIGRR report on post-#Brexit deregulation said should have an expanded remit and be at heart of the 'build back better' plans, to maximise the strength of UK life sciences/3
Spent today at two colleges in Brighton talking to A-Level/BTec students... @RoedeanSchool @varndean ...it was uplifting! Yes grades have been inflated, but that is a) unavoidable without public exams b) better than the blind algorithm /1 #ALevelResults
@RoedeanSchool@varndean Why unavoidable? Because with no-one sitting exams, no-one has a 'bad day' or a 'good day'...so grades can only be awarded on the maximum potential of each student. Otherwise teachers are guessing/playing God. Each students has a 'basket of evidence' backing up their grade /2
@RoedeanSchool@varndean The result? About 45 per cent got A*/A which is crazy -- but surely better than the algorithm that discriminated (among other things) on class sizes. So (poorer) schools with bigger classes got marked down/3