🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺🎓🚌🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🎓🚌🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨IT’S OUT: my latest #brexit briefing.

School trips to Britain put at risk by EU passport rule change via @FT tl;dr…stopping EU kids using ID cards will help erode U.K. bond with EU warn travel groups. 😢

Stay with me /1
on.ft.com/3CikSsL
@FT This is one of those stories where the impact of #Brexit is not quantified in £s or euros...but in the gradual building up of barriers between the EU and the UK.

In this case, stopping use of EU ID cards for travel into UK...which will hit EU school trips /2
@FT It might not seem like a big deal, requiring everyone has a passport to enter UK, but in practice companies that organise school trips -- one of the cheapest and earlies forms of cultural exposure -- say it will hit them hard/3
@FT They wrote to @BorisJohnson in April warning of the impact -- since in many countries like France and Germany the policy is 'all go or no go'...so if one kid has only an ID card, or a non-EU kid that needs a visa...then, unless they get passport/visas the class can't go/4
@FT @BorisJohnson The EU had a “List of Travellers” scheme to enable non-EU children to travel with their group without a visa. That’s been stopped by the Home Office too.

The reason? Security apparently. EU ID cards are not secure. /5
@FT @BorisJohnson But as Antoine Bretin, @antoinebretin the youth stays director at the language exchange group Verdié Hello @VerdieHello and cosignatory of the letter observed in exasperation to the Briefing, “you don’t get many terrorists travelling in school groups”. /6
@FT @BorisJohnson @antoinebretin @VerdieHello And the reality is that people -- like goods and services -- take the line of least resistance. It's not as if there are not plenty inside the EU -- Florence, Madrid, Vienna, Paris ...all make a good school trip destination. /7
@FT @BorisJohnson @antoinebretin @VerdieHello There will be as Susan Jones of @Linguastay_RP_C explains a financial cost to this... families that host kids, tourism destinations (that take about 50% of trip spend) will all feel a bit. /8
But it's the cultural cost. ONS reckons trade will be 15% down long term...so what does a 15% hit to cultural exchange means....over the longer term, in terms of understanding, exposure and contacts with the near-neighbourhood? Who knows. But it's got to be negative/9
Labour Peer Philip Hunt thought it was a “depressing advert for global Britain” that he felt to be “shortsighted . . . petty and mean-spirited”.... I guess some will think it's the plan, but @BorisJohnson
has always said we're leaving the EU, not Europe/10
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/e7…
@BorisJohnson But these policies -- the Home Office is implacable it will not look at exemptions for U18s -- will have that effect. They'll see put barriers with the UK's neighbourhood...to what effect, we'll have to wait and see. ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Foster

Peter Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pmdfoster

10 Sep
🚨🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧📀👩‍💻📀👩‍💻📀🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨🚨

EXc: UK eyes removing EU’s human review of AI decisions.

Among ideas as U.K. gov consults on how to seek U.K. #brexit “data dividend”.

But privacy campaigners and EU will be watching. /1

on.ft.com/38S3q1x
This relates to Article 22 of GDPR, the EU data protection regulation which guarantees a human review of automated decision or profiling -- for EG online loan award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test using algorithms to filter candidates. /2

ico.org.uk/for-organisati…
Art 22 has been a target for Brexiters like Iain Duncan Smith who led the govt's TIGRR review on how to seek a regulatory dividend from Brexit.

Their report argued A22 should be removed and replaced with a public interest test. /3

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 14 tweets
6 Sep
NEW: UK is about to extend "grace periods" for NI Protocol that has caused so much difficulty since #Brexit -- EU side will not object -- so that talks on UK Command Paper can continue....BUT (to be clear) two sides still miles apart /1

ft.com/content/0faeac…
So, take Lord Frost @DavidGHFrost speech at weekend (worth reading)... he repeats that “solutions which involve ‘flexibilities’ within the current rules won’t work for us”. But that is exactly where the EU is.../2

gov.uk/government/spe…
@DavidGHFrost As Irish dep pm/Tanaiste @LeoVaradkar told @BBCr4today this morning there is "no appetite" in EU capitals for re-write:

“We don’t really see the case for renegotiating it [the protocol] so soon, we think most of the solutions can be found within the existing agreement.” /3
Read 7 tweets
2 Sep
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇬🇧🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇧🇬🇧🚨🚨UK proposal to rewrite section of Brexit deal wins lawyers’ backing - my latest via @FT with ⁦@PickardJE⁩. It’s about Article 10, and why it’s arguably obsolete. Heralds battles to come.

1/thread.
on.ft.com/3jDa4iD
@FT @PickardJE This is an interesting intervention from @GeorgePeretzQC and @jamesrwebber
that runs rule over the demand from @DavidGHFrost
last july that Article 10 of the NI Protocol should be replaced/re-written. Their full text is here..but tl;dr /2

eurelationslaw.com/blog/the-uks-p…
@FT @PickardJE @GeorgePeretzQC @jamesrwebber @DavidGHFrost Article 10 is that part of the Protocol on state aid which means that UK Govt subsidy decisions that could impact on NI goods trade need to be referred to Brussels...even if those decision are primarily for UK economy. Understandably Brexiters hate it. /3
Read 11 tweets
20 Aug
🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧💉🏥🔬🧬🧪🧫🇪🇺🚛🚨🚨My latest #Brexit Briefing is out. And it looks at “regulatory science” and the “real opportunity of Brexit”…which might not quite be what is commonly understood. via @FT Stay with me/1
ft.com/content/19af24…
@FT It has been one of the long-running themes of #Brexit that the UK, freed of the stultifying regulatory dead hand of Brussels, can prosper by being 'nimbler' and more 'innovative' and in, simple terms, slashing 'red tape'...which makes for a strong political narrative. BUT.../2
@FT It comes up against some uncomfortable facts, which is that the UK (4pc, say of total global spending on medical devices) really isn't big enough to make the regulatory weather...global industries like pharma, finance etc have to follow EU, US standards to monetize products/3
Read 17 tweets
14 Aug
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺💉💊💉💊💉💊🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨 EXC: Staff at UK medical regulator ⁦MHRA⁩ express alarm at plan to slash 300 of 1,200 jobs after #brexit — despite #covid19 triumphs and U.K. gov wanting life sciences at heart of economic recovery. 🤔🤔🤔stay with me/1
ft.com/content/8ef390…
Yes, that's the same MHRA regulator that stopped the #Covid19 ventilator programme descending into farce and helped fast-track coronavirus vaccines approvals -- for which it was lauded as "phenomenal" in UK govt's life sciences plan./2

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
And the same MHRA that Iain Duncan Smith in this TIGRR report on post-#Brexit deregulation said should have an expanded remit and be at heart of the 'build back better' plans, to maximise the strength of UK life sciences/3

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 15 tweets
10 Aug
Spent today at two colleges in Brighton talking to A-Level/BTec students... @RoedeanSchool
@varndean ...it was uplifting! Yes grades have been inflated, but that is a) unavoidable without public exams b) better than the blind algorithm /1 #ALevelResults

ft.com/content/0288a0…
@RoedeanSchool @varndean Why unavoidable? Because with no-one sitting exams, no-one has a 'bad day' or a 'good day'...so grades can only be awarded on the maximum potential of each student. Otherwise teachers are guessing/playing God. Each students has a 'basket of evidence' backing up their grade /2
@RoedeanSchool @varndean The result? About 45 per cent got A*/A which is crazy -- but surely better than the algorithm that discriminated (among other things) on class sizes. So (poorer) schools with bigger classes got marked down/3
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(