1/ I always joke that predicting the future of tech is way easier than most people think... the hard part is making any money off those predictions

This 2001 paper ("Big in Japan: iMode and the Mobile Internet") is one of the best examples I've ever seen- core.ac.uk/download/pdf/3…
2/ Looking back, the modern smartphone era didn't begin until the launch of the iPhone in 2007

But this paper makes it clear: even in 2001, it was obvious to pretty much everyone that the future of the internet was going to be mobile
3/ Moreover, all eyes pointed to Japan as a template for the rest of the world: in 1999, the Japanese telco NTT DoCoMo had launched "iMode," the world's first mass-adopted mobile internet service. By 2001 it had over 20 million users (15% of the Japanese population)
4/ iMode was vertically-integrated: NTT DoCoMo bundled 2G internet connectivity with its own proto-smartphone hardware (in partnership with OEMs), custom web browser, proprietary web standard (a modified version of HTML), and in-house index (a portal of 1480 'approved' websites)
5/ In case it's not clear, this is super weird by today's standards! The telcos didn't just control internet service - they basically controlled the INTERNET

To get your website on iMode, you had to pay DoCoMo an upfront fee + a *9% take rate*. This was $3.4B business in 2001
6/ Imagine you're a tech executive or investor looking at Japan in 2001. What's the takeaway?

You should be getting into the telecom business! After all, who wouldn't want to get their very own 9% cut of what is obviously going to be a trillion dollar mobile internet TAM?
7/ Of course, that's not what happened. Instead, Japan proves to be a dead end

6 years later, Apple launches the iPhone... and turns the tables on the telcos by seizing full control over the hardware, the OS, the browser, and the app store. Telcos remain a dumb pipe to this day
8/ What's the lesson here?

Predicting the general contours of the future is easy ('people will browse the internet on their phones'). However, it's the details that ultimately matter, ie who / when / where / why?

Case studies can give false comfort. Precedent is not destiny!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Corry Wang

Corry Wang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @corry_wang

6 Jul
1/ In 1968, former ARPA director J. C. R. Licklider published "The Computer As A Communication Device"

Given it was written right before the launch of the ARPANET, this is basically the founding document of the internet

And its predictions hold up remarkably well!
2/ For context: Mitchell Waldrop has called JCR Licklider "computing's Johnny Appleseed." As an ARPA director in the 60s, he basically funded half of the projects that became the internet

This paper was the brainchild of him & protege Bob Taylor, who later led Xerox PARC
3/ Licklider opens straight to the point:

"In a few years, men will be able to communicate more effectively through a machine than face to face."

"The programmed digital computer can change communication more profoundly than did the printing press and the picture tube"
Read 11 tweets
27 Mar
1/ A fun piece of tech history that I came across today: an online copy of Microsoft's 1986 IPO prospectus. At just 52 pages, a light piece of weekend reading!

Some takeaways from my skim -

lannigan.org/pdf/Microsoft_…
2/ No surprise, valuations were still in a whole other world back then

Microsoft IPOed with $140M in 1985 revenues (growing 40% per annum), and 30% operating margins

Yet the IPO market cap was $520M... aka ~3x forward sales, or ~15x forward *earnings*
3/ Microsoft's 1985 revenues: 54% systems, 38% applications, and 8% hardware & books

Here's a 1-paragraph mention of Windows, a recent GUI "extension of MS-DOS"

"It is too early in the life of Windows to determine what level of acceptance it will attain in the marketplace"
Read 5 tweets
4 Mar
1/ Underrated post from @afterwt - a genuinely fresh take on an famous case study, Buffett's original 1987 investment in Coke
2/ Most investors know 1980s-era Coke was an example of untapped pricing power - but *why* was this the case?

Turns out Coke was subject to a 100-year-old bottling agreement that had fixed its syrup pricing at $1 per gallon... in perpetuity! (+ later adjustments for inflation) Image
3/ The turning point was 1986: that's when Doug Ivester invented the "49% solution," a scheme to acquire Coke's old US bottlers and install discretionary pricing for the first time ever

Not coincidentally, Buffett starts buying stock a year later Image
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
1/ Thoughts on the Myth of the "First Mover"

This thread by @danrose stirred something I've been thinking about for a while - the myth of first mover advantage

To this day, most people assume Amazon Web Services was the first cloud computing service. This isn't quite true
2/ At its March 2006 launch, AWS was probably the 4th or 5th cloud service run by a Fortune 500 firm

HP launched its Flexible Computing Service in Nov 2005
Sun Grid went into beta in 2004
IBM launched "Linux Virtual Services" in 2002!

But AWS is the only one anybody remembers
3/ I'll focus on IBM here -

From the WSJ in *2002*: "Linux Virtual Services allows customers to run their own software on mainframes in IBM data centers and pay rates based largely on the amount of computing power they use"

wsj.com/articles/SB102…

Sounds like the cloud to me!
Read 9 tweets
2 Jan
1/ Lessons From The Tech Bubble:

Last year, I spent my winter holiday reading hundreds of pages of equity research from the 1999/2000 era, to try to understand what it was like investing during the bubble

A few people recently asked me for my takeaways. Here they are - Image
2/ Every document hereon comes from my former employer Bernstein Research's internal research archive, which extend back to 1994

Unfortunately, they're not available to the public (even Bernstein's client website cuts off at 2003), but happy to give more details if necessary
3/ LESSON #1: Everybody knew it was a bubble

Unfortunately, the quip "it's not a bubble if everyone says it is" just isn't true

Investors were comparing the internet sector to tulip mania as early as mid-98. Bernstein held an entire conference on it in June 99! ImageImage
Read 9 tweets
21 Dec 20
1/ In September 1993, then-Microsoft exec Nathan Myhrvold wrote his landmark memo "Road Kill on the Information Highway", laying out a dozen-ish predictions on the rise of the internet

27 years later, I think it's a super interesting case study. Let's evaluate the predictions -
2/ PREDICTION #1: The rise of a surveillance society - police bodycams, CCTV, 24/7 personal recording, and deepfakes

GRADE: A-

Pretty close!
3/ PREDICTION #2: Telecommuting, an end to the "tyranny of geography" and gerrymandering

GRADE: B-

Alas, the electoral college still matters today. The WFH prediction hits closer, but turns out it took two and a half decades + a pandemic to get things going
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(