The Subsidy Control Bill has its second reading in Parliament tomorrow providing MPs with their first opportunity to debate the principles of this important piece of post-#Brexit legislation.
In this 🧵 I set out the main issues to look out for…
3) What kind of subsidies will be subject to @CMAgovUK scrutiny?
We know certain subsidies will be subject to review by the Competition and Markets Authority - but the Government has yet to specify which types of subsidy will be subject to the mandatory referral process.
4/8
4) Is the Subsidy Control Bill inconsistent with Levelling Up?
Redwall MPs may be surprised the Bill doesn’t include express provisions to incentivise investment into deprived areas
Indeed under the new rules it can be easier to fund a project in Mayfair than Middlesbrough
The Subsidy Control Bill is an incredibly important piece of post-#Brexit legislation shaping how public funding awarded by over 500 bodies can support our economy in the future.
The European Commission has published a notice which pushes back on the UK government’s interpretation of when State aid law will apply under the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Is the honeymoon over? Will the EU start challenging UK subsidies?
You’ll recall that on 31 December, @beisgovuk published guidance on the new Subsidy Control regime.
The Northern Ireland Protocol section took a surprisingly robust approach to interpreting when EU State aid law needs to be applied and when it doesn’t.
Some of this was supported by the contents of a joint statement between the UK and EU, but crucially the words “liable to have an effect on trade” were downplayed.
Although the Subsidy Control guidance is clearly intended to be helpful, it’s very complicated.
Statements like the one below, are likely to have a chilling effect on the award of public funding.
2/5
The need for a “dual assessment” (taking account of EU State aid law as well as UK Subsidy Control rules) is necessary for awards due to Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
The guidance is more optimistic on the impact of Article 10 than @GeorgePeretzQC (below).
Firstly subsidy races. Each year the US public sector spends c.$100 bn persuading businesses to relocate within the US. No real benefit for US economy.
There are multiple reasons for this, which include:
> State aid rules align with the UK (and in particular Tory) mindset that subsidies should be a last resort;
> Frost has agreed sensible general principles on subsidies;
@Peston@BorisJohnson > having the EU bound to certain standards / principles is in the UK’s interest as it ensures their system doesn’t become more permissive;
> which is in our interest as the UK doesn’t award as much State aid and confident that our businesses can win work on merit alone.
@Peston@BorisJohnson > the rules don’t really constrain the UK, after all Germany spends 4 times as much under the same rules...
> Tech start ups can be funded under the EU rules. That the UK hasn’t is about budget not rules.