The Subsidy Control Bill has its second reading in Parliament tomorrow providing MPs with their first opportunity to debate the principles of this important piece of post-#Brexit legislation.

In this 🧵 I set out the main issues to look out for…

1/8 linkedin.com/posts/alexande…
1) Is the overall strategy correct?

The Subsidy Control Bill aims to create a more permissive system than under EU State aid rules.

Doing away with EU rules will be popular but how will free market minded MPs respond to a policy of loosening the controls on public funding?

2/8
2) Transparency Concerns

The Government’s anti-corruption Tsar @JohnPenroseNews has raised concerns about the transparency of the subsidy regime.

Indeed there are fewer subsidies listed on the national database than public bodies awarding subsidies

tinyurl.com/Subsy

3/8
3) What kind of subsidies will be subject to @CMAgovUK scrutiny?

We know certain subsidies will be subject to review by the Competition and Markets Authority - but the Government has yet to specify which types of subsidy will be subject to the mandatory referral process.

4/8
4) Is the Subsidy Control Bill inconsistent with Levelling Up?

Redwall MPs may be surprised the Bill doesn’t include express provisions to incentivise investment into deprived areas

Indeed under the new rules it can be easier to fund a project in Mayfair than Middlesbrough

5/8
5) Who will design the safe harbours?

Thankfully the Subsidy Control Bill contains provision for the development of ‘Streamlined Subsidy Schemes’ (cf. safe harbours).

However these need to be designed with the input of practitioners. Will the Government set up a taskforce?

6/8
6) Making sure the new rules don’t inadvertently obstruct good projects

Some of the drafting in the Bill is problematic, for example an unnecessarily overly prescriptive definition of “ailing or insolvent”.

telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/…

7/8
The Subsidy Control Bill is an incredibly important piece of post-#Brexit legislation shaping how public funding awarded by over 500 bodies can support our economy in the future.

It’s crucial the UK gets this right…

tinyurl.com/SubsidyLaw

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander Rose

Alexander Rose Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexanderPHRose

20 Jan
The European Commission has published a notice which pushes back on the UK government’s interpretation of when State aid law will apply under the Northern Ireland Protocol.

Is the honeymoon over? Will the EU start challenging UK subsidies?

ec.europa.eu/info/sites/inf…
You’ll recall that on 31 December, @beisgovuk published guidance on the new Subsidy Control regime.

The Northern Ireland Protocol section took a surprisingly robust approach to interpreting when EU State aid law needs to be applied and when it doesn’t.
Some of this was supported by the contents of a joint statement between the UK and EU, but crucially the words “liable to have an effect on trade” were downplayed.
Read 10 tweets
1 Jan
A few thoughts on the new Subsidy Control guidance...

1/5
Although the Subsidy Control guidance is clearly intended to be helpful, it’s very complicated.

Statements like the one below, are likely to have a chilling effect on the award of public funding.

2/5
The need for a “dual assessment” (taking account of EU State aid law as well as UK Subsidy Control rules) is necessary for awards due to Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The guidance is more optimistic on the impact of Article 10 than @GeorgePeretzQC (below).

3/5
Read 6 tweets
20 Oct 20
What happens in the absence of State aid rules?

A couple of US examples provide some insight.

Firstly subsidy races. Each year the US public sector spends c.$100 bn persuading businesses to relocate within the US. No real benefit for US economy.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

•1•
Subsidy auctions are competitions organised by big companies to play off funding bodies and generate the biggest taxpayer funded subsidy.

State aid rules act as a backstop for the public sector to collectively refuse to go beyond set values. Bids win on merit, not money.

•2•
In 2017 Amazon launched a subsidy auction in the US for a ‘second’ headquarters.

With weak subsidy control rules over 238 cities bid against each other.

Taxpayer subsidies spiralled upwards. State aid rules would have safeguarded the taxpayer.

•3•

marketwatch.com/story/what-ama…
Read 9 tweets
19 Oct 20
Interesting article by @Peston - but here’s why I don’t think ‘State aid’ will end the UK-EU trade talks.

• A thread •
There are multiple reasons why it’s a win-win for both parties to find agreement on State aid which include:

> State aid rules align with the UK (and in particular Tory) mindset that subsidies should be a last resort;

> Frost has agreed sensible general principles on subsidies;
> the EU State aid rules don’t really constrain the UK, after all Germany spends 4 times as much under the same rules...

> Tech start ups can be funded under the EU rules. That the UK hasn’t is about budget not rules.
Read 6 tweets
19 Oct 20
@Peston @BorisJohnson State aid will be solved in the EU-UK trade talks.

There are multiple reasons for this, which include:

> State aid rules align with the UK (and in particular Tory) mindset that subsidies should be a last resort;

> Frost has agreed sensible general principles on subsidies;
@Peston @BorisJohnson > having the EU bound to certain standards / principles is in the UK’s interest as it ensures their system doesn’t become more permissive;

> which is in our interest as the UK doesn’t award as much State aid and confident that our businesses can win work on merit alone.
@Peston @BorisJohnson > the rules don’t really constrain the UK, after all Germany spends 4 times as much under the same rules...

> Tech start ups can be funded under the EU rules. That the UK hasn’t is about budget not rules.
Read 5 tweets
29 Sep 20
The UK Government has laid a Statutory Instrument to revoke EU State aid rules.

It’s controversial because at this time the UK won’t have a workable replacement regime in place on 1 January 2020.

legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2020/978…

• a thread • Image
On 9th September the Government announced that in a “no deal” scenario the UK will follow World Trade Organisation subsidy rules.

gov.uk/government/new…
But the WTO rules were never designed to regulate domestic subsidies.

For that reason they don’t set out the basic rules most people expect to see in place for subsidies.

eg. transparency & limiting subsidies so they apply to genuinely incurred costs.

tinyurl.com/yxn7e3z7 Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(