This column in Sankei by Abiru Rui, a Sankei writer who also wrote several rather hagiographic books about Abe, is an extremely helpful look at how the right wing sees Kono. My quick reading follows.
He opens by noting his anxiety about Kono's basing his campaign on his "ability to breakthrough" challenges. He says that Kono's vague promises that can be easily ignored are reminiscent of the DPJ.
(Has anyone done systematic study on the uses of the DPJ in right-wing rhetoric?)
He then repeats Kishida and Takaichi critiques of the Kono pension proposal mentioned in this story, suggesting Kono isn't being honest about how high consumption tax rate will need to be to fund pension scheme.
Again, like the straight news article, he recounts how Kan Naoto had wanted to do something similar but was vague about the details.
He accuses him of similar vagueness in national security, noting that he dismissed the acquisition of strike capabilities but then only offered a reference to strengthening US-Japan deterrence capabilities.
Then he adds another attack. He says that Nihon Tanshi -- the electrical connector business -- where Kono worked briefly, where his younger brother is CEO, and in which Kono holds shares, is expanding its business in China and could therefore influence his China policy.
Kono, he says, brushed this off brusquely when asked in a press conference this week.
Then, another DPJ comparison. He notes that Kono said he has declared his holdings openly, much like Ozawa's group declared its property holdings.
He ends on a threatening note.
"It is not difficult to imagine that every time he takes a decision regarding relations with China, his relationship with Nihon Tanshi will come up."
(Of course, nothing about Abe's three-year diplomatic campaign with Beijing in coordination with corporate Japan.)
(Also never mind that Japan has not decoupled from China and plenty of businesses are investing more.)
While Kono's investments are fair game, this kind of dare I say, red baiting is a worrisome development. It also shows how Japan's China debate has narrowed over the past year.
This effort to build a case against Kono -- going so far as to tar him with the DPJ brush -- is why it's hard not to be bearish about his chances against Kishida.
It also suggests that if Kono does win, the right wing could be a thorn in his side.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some excerpts: "This year's leadership contest reveals the extent to which his premiership continues to shape and constrain the choices available to Japan's leaders."
"It is increasingly apparent that Abe left his successors a toolbox -- fiscal and monetary stimulus, state-led industrial policy, more activist foreign policy led by a strengthened prime minister's office -- but not a road map."
The LDP's campaign website includes the "manifestos" for each of the candidates. Here's a brief guide.
1) Noda Seiko (@noda_seiko93)
Slogan: Politics that can be understood by anyone
She's less a moderate than an outright liberal, particularly in the LDP. Her statement is focused on fostering a "paradigm shift" that accommodates a more diverse society. …in.jp-east-2.storage.api.nifcloud.com/sousai21/pdf/n…
Her platform is to "trust the experts" on Covid-19; realize child-centered politics; fairness towards women, the elderly, persons with disabilities, LGBTQ (allow separate surnames); endorses decarbonization, focuses on renewables but nothing about nuclear.
I'm starting a thread for stray thoughts about the #自民党総裁選.
Kono's popularity and quirky communication style mask the extent to which he's actually quite similar to Suga. Very good with the details of policy, less good at the "vision thing." This was one of the striking things about his book.