Despite promising not to trash the last four years, Starmer declared in his #Lab21 speech that Labour would “never again go into an election with a manifesto that is not a serious plan for government”
One key pledge in 2019 was universal free broadband. The pandemic proved how necessary that was with children home-schooled and many working from home.
Now the DWP has partnered with TalkTalk to offer jobseekers six months free broadband
So universal free full-fibre broadband?
Labour also promised a ‘Warm Homes for All’ policy – which Starmer re-announced it in his #Lab21 speech. mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
The retrofitting scheme would create jobs, reduce bills, reduce emissions, so ..?
That Warm Homes for All policy was part of a huge £250 billion Green Transformation Fund - £25bn a year of green investment over 10 years.
The 2019 manifesto pledged to raise corporation tax to 26%.
Rishi Sunak's last Budget pledged to raise corporation tax to 25% in 2023. At the time Keir Starmer opposed saying "now is not the time for tax rises" cityam.com/keir-starmer-p…
So what do you back?
We pledged £bns to compensate @WASPI_Campaign women, whose pension age was raised without fair warning
Since then, the Parliamentary Ombudsman has found those women were not adequately informed, a ruling that brings compensation closer bbc.co.uk/news/business-…
So was that pledge?
We promised to achieve free personal care (as Labour legislated for in Scotland in 2002), investing an extra £10.8bn as we move towards a free universal National Care Service.
So free personal care and a National Care Service ..?
We pledged public ownership of the railways.
Just yesterday, Grant Shapps took the Southeastern rail franchise into public ownership. The East Coast mainline franchise has remained in public control since 2018! mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
So public ownership of the railways ..?
Keir of course was in the shadow cabinet that signed off the 2019 manifesto.
His area was Brexit🇪🇺🇬🇧. He didn't mention that in his assessment of 2019.
So in hindsight, was Labour's 2019 Brexit policy ..?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What a sad state of affairs. In recent years, the FBU reaffiliated to Labour and RMT consulted its members on doing so.
BFAWU announced its decision to consult its members on disaffiliation weeks ago, only 2 days ago did anyone from Labour leadership even get in touch with them
Today at #Lab21 conference will debate the rules for electing Keir Starmer's successor.
This has been a damaging spectacle over the last few days, but the consequences of today's vote could be more damaging to the party in the long term ... 🧵
The first thing to note is that the original proposals to revert to a less democratic electoral college have been withdrawn, after a huge backlash
To focus on internal politics at this time is misjudged. To do it incompetently ...
The proposals being debated today keep OMOV but would change the rules in the following ways
-Raise threshold of MP nominations from 10% to 20% (currently c.40 MPs)
-Ditch registered supporters
-Freeze date for members 6 months prior to start of contest (new members can’t vote)
Right so, of those open to voting Labour, 48% did not vote in 2019.
So why target soft Tories, and not non-voters?
The piece argues: "When the group is adjusted for its likelihood to vote, soft Tory supporters account for 43% of the group" 2/n
But here's the difference. Non-voters require a different strategy. They haven't voted, so you have to inspire them.
As I argued in this piece a month ago "electoral strategy isn't a value-free science", it depends on the coalition you want to build 3/n theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the second Labour government falling when then Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald proposed a 20% cut in unemployment benefit
Today Johnson and Sunak are about to cut #UniversalCredit by 21%
The Labour government was elected in 1929, just before the Wall Street Crash provoked a global depression. Despite many on the left of the party putting forward what would become known as Keynesian solutions, MacDonald and Snowden insisted on cuts to the incomes of the poorest
At Labour conference in 1930, James Maxton had attacked the leadership for their “timidity and vacillation” and said the Government should “use all its powers towards increasing the purchasing power of the workers, reducing workers’ hours, initiating a national housing programme”