Here is our five part growth forecasting series. While the series focused on forecasting growth for faster than average growing businesses, the margin for error is often *less* for slow growth companies. See our prior series on slow growth risk at the end of this thread. 1/x
Growth is to investors what the song of the Sirens was to Odysseus. Yet investors shouldn't just ignore growth potential as traditional value investing often implied. 2/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/04/for…
But growth forecasting is plagued by systematic, excessive optimism. So investors must find a way to control for this as it is the key reason growth investors underperform. 3/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/05/for…
But while using base rates as a forecasting tool is table stakes for successful forecasting, they are far from a crystal ball and must be applied with their shortfalls in mind. 4/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/06/for…
Researchers on decision making and forecasting are clear that there is no one "right" base rate and that base rates must be integrated with a direct analysis of the specific forecast being made. We use our Netflix growth forecast as an example. 5/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/06/for…
Some companies have such idiosyncratic positioning that they break the base rates of more typical companies. We explore "category killers that benefit from positive feedback loops in rapidly growing markets" as an example. 6/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/08/for…
While our series focused on forecasting elevated growth, we also said all investors in all stocks make at least implicit forecasts. In a prior series we discussed why low growth stocks are risky due to the concept of stall speed. 7/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/02/22/the…
We offered a case study of our investment gone wrong in Prestige Brands to illustrate how small changes in forecasts dramatically impact valuation of low growth stocks. 8/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/02/27/the…
Concerningly, given our focus on high ROIC businesses, we explored how it is these types of companies for whom stall speed risk is most negatively impactful. 9/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/04/04/the…
We ended our series, written in 2019, by looking at the New Normal economic thesis and how "low growth for good" would impact the fair value of the overall market and impact key segments very differently from each other. My times have changed! End/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/04/08/the…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This dynamic of top talent viewing flexible hybrid work environments as a *requirement* is going to really test some top performing, but old school investment firms. wsj.com/articles/if-yo…
If an analyst is looking for a job, an investment firm that views remote work as a “perk,” requires permission, or has an arbitrary limit, will likely be seen as a firm that is out of touch, doesn’t trust their staff, or is at minimum a slow to adapt organization. Major red flag.
Our guess is there will be a couple year window where top talent incrementally shifts from older established firms to younger, more digitally native, adaptable investment organizations. Then the older firms will capitulate.
1/x In April of 2020 a pair of articles were published within 24 hours of each other by @pmarca and @morganhousel, which together laid out the roadmap for the economic path we are now following. The ship has already set sail, the question is just what the journey will be like.
2/x in @pmarca's piece, he laid out how the US has stopped "building" and that the time had arrived where the only path forward was to Build. a16z.com/2020/04/18/its…
3/x But how will we pay for it? This was the subject that @morganhousel tackled as he laid out the post WWII history of debt levels consistently falling even as the debt was never repaid. collaborativefund.com/blog/who-pays-…
1/x One of the great things about blogging is you assemble a record of real time thoughts during periods of stress. This allows for reviews of what went as expected and what didn't. Our 2020 posts focused mostly on how we were assessing unprecedented levels of change. Links below
2/x Prior to COVID, we wrote about how forecasts are a necessary part of investing. Your only choice is whether to make explicit forecasts or implicit ones. intrinsicinvesting.com/2020/01/10/pic…
3/x We discussed the key difference between a company's products being "relevant" vs "recognizable" and discussed how highly recognizable products may be losing relevance, which lays a trap for investors. intrinsicinvesting.com/2020/02/21/rel…
1/x In 2019, we covered a lot of ground in our posts. We tackled position sizing, introduced a diagram illustrating our investment philosophy, reported on our trip to China, and more. You can explore posts from earlier years in the retweeted threads below.
2/x We started the year talking about "hyperbolic discounting", a "$5 phrase" that explains a lot about investor behavior. intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/01/02/tak…
3/x We sent Arif on a research trip to Italy to have the Ferrari experience first hand. What he came back with was the realization that their business model is best understood as a global "club". intrinsicinvesting.com/2019/01/10/joi…
1/x We recently got a request from new reader @NMPCap to tweet some of our top blog posts from the past. Honestly, nobody was reading our blog back in 2016! So here's some of our early posts you may have missed.