X : Masks?
Me : Good idea. I was suckered into the whole droplet view (which was WHO advice last year) ... thank heavens for Masks4All and the work they did.
Me : Ah. Well, something for me to read later on this week.
X : "PM could have saved thousands by locking down earlier’
Me : Many tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands over the long term. This is now endemic, it didn't have to be. Don't get me started on the whole herd immunity madness or the reliance on technology solutions.
X : Great Barrington Declaration?
Me : Hmmm .. .something about don't get me started? I think GBD is useful as a voluntary watchlist for people that are a risk to national security and public health -
... by now, we should be arresting those financing it.
X : Have you seen this - bylinetimes.com/2021/10/07/fou…?
Me : Hmmm. My trust in the Conservative party is so low that I can't even be bothered to check whether this is true. Because it's ghastly, I'll just assume it is. There is no bar too low for this Government.
X : What about Boris' speech on ...
Me : ... nothing. Kind words butter no parsnips. He occassionaly says the right thing, I just don't believe any of it. I have zero trust in this Government ... nada, nilch, none, zero. I don't believe a word they say.
X : Levelling up?
Me : A slogan. The action is cut £20 a week from the poorest, penalise further with NI increases, hand big consultancy and lucrative contracts to mates, say we're not going to do austerity but follow up with more austerity and cuts as "hard choices".
Me : What concerns me most is that we are being habituated to this sleeze and corruption. Events that would have toppled former Governments seem to be almost weekly occurrences.
X : Have you seen this -
Me : Hmmm. Critical Theory 101 straight out of Frankfurt school replacing existing power structures with a new ideology around Cummings and mates? No thanks. I'd rather not replace one lot of jokers for another.
X : Well, what is your solution?
Me : Go back to Athenian democracy. Try sortition, random selection rather than "election" of our representatives who then vote on laws for all of us. Elections can always be manipulated to the disadvantage of society and in favour of individuals.
X : Random?
Me : If you want to build a more inclusive and equitable society then you're going to have to remove exclusion from the political system. Random selection of MPs gives you that, it allows everyone the same opportunity and creates a more representative system.
Me: Start with the House of Lords. That chamber should be replaced by sortition to provide a more representative chamber. It'll take time but once established then look to replace the House of Commons and this dreadful system of elections we have created in our democracy.
X : You're not a fan of Dominic?
Me : I'd rather have Boris or Kier leading the country over Dominic plus mates. I agree we can do much better but Dominic is not the answer.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : Why so amazing?
Me : It's something @snowded reinforced at Map Camp yesterday. The examples of continuous small efforts in creating momentum to create change in a system. @snowded is always spot on with this stuff.
X : What's that got to do with videos?
Me : It's not really about videos, it's about art (whether videos or video games or whatever) and it's ability to influence societal values and hence power structures.
X : I don't get that map.
Me : You don't need to. All you need to understand is we change society through art.
X : Blah, blah, blah, business leader.
Me : Business leader?
X : Yes, that's what I am.
Me : The ability to lead people that you pay to be lead by you?
X : No, I give direction.
Me : Would anyone follow you if you weren't paying them? I think business manager might be more apt.
X : I am a leader.
Me : In a very loose sense of the word. I could argue that I am beautiful by paying a thousand people to say so ... doesn't make it true. I understand where you're going but I wouldn't go around calling yourself a business leader. What's wrong with manager?
X : I am more than a manager.
Me : So it's not about the role and what you do, it's about ego?
X : No, it's about the simple truth that I lead.
Me : Gosh, nothing simple in this. How many ways can we unpack this. I better not.
X : Why?
Me : I'll cause more harm than good.
Asked about pipeines in maps ... as simple as I can
You can think of pipelines as categories for many evolving components that we have choice over (i.e. substitution) ... for example, content in entertainment (i.e. films).
X : Isn't power a commodity?
Me : Hell's bells. I'm showing you an example to explain the meaning of a pipeline. Fair point though. Is this clearer?
This has almost nothing to do with what is beneficial to the economy and almost everything to do with power, status symbols, inertia and vested interests. UK should be encouraging adaptation not trying to recreate the past. Disappointing from a UK Gov figure ->
X : Do you think it really matters?
Me : I wouldn't talk about it if I didn't. We need our corporations to adapt, the new behaviours that are emerging depend upon remote working, distributed communication and access to data.
It's all about future state. As we currently stand, China will be the space fairing nation of 2050 with km wide space stations, the emerging Star Trek -phys.org/news/2021-09-c…
The UK will do a nice line in luxury yacht rental and frozen yoghurt - ft.com/content/351cf2…
X : Last year you said that China would start to focus on tackling inequality.
Me : Social mobility will become increasingly important for competition around the world. This was obvious years ago but it was clearly signalled that China would make this play a few years back. Why?
X : Common prosperity, tackling tech vendors etc?
Me : Yep. It's all about future competitiveness and exposing the achilles heel of the Western system. Not much we can do about it. We're at the start of the program though, it'll take years for the effect to be seen. Why?
X : This is more than just raising people out of poverty?
Me : Of course. This is all about being seen as successful in economic terms, building that sense of belonging and safety within the collective whilst undermining other collectives as people question ... why?
X : How do you do strategy?
Me : First, I start by observing the environment (including producing a map). Then I challenge and interrogate the map. Finally, I start scenario planning on the map with scribbles that represent different connections and gameplay. Why?
X : Is there a method?
Me : Rounds of challenge and scenario planning on the map. There are playbooks (I have over 100 patterns I've collected) which you can apply but it's mainly thought plus more interrogation. It's not a perfect or formal exercise.
X : What patterns?
Me : hmmm
Me : This is a list of some basic gameplay. It'll be good enough for you to explore. But, don't bother to do this until you've got mapping and basic principles sorted. If that's not the case then your only strategy is "to stop punching ourselves in the face".