The average number of applications submitted by applicants is up, too.
Here are the current averages for each specialty (considering all applicant types - MDs, DOs, and IMGs).
MD applicants in dermatology, otolaryngology, urology, and neurosurgery now submit a mean of around 80 applications or more - and the average MD applicant in orthopedics submits nearly 100 applications.
And here are the data for DO applicants.
In most specialties, DOs submit more applications than their MD peers. (The exceptions are a few highly competitive specialties, in which there are still programs that do not seriously consider DO applicants).
As a reminder, the figures above show only the average *within that specialty.*
But these days, many applicants apply to more than one specialty… so the total number of applications submitted by each applicant is even higher than the figures above would suggest.
Here are the 2020 ERAS cross-specialty applicant data, which show the extent of multiple-specialty application.
e.g., 148 applicants applied to both ortho and otolaryngology programs; 126 applied in both derm and PM&R; 169 applied in both psychiatry and general surgery; etc.
Here’s how the average number of applications submitted has grown over time - doubling in little over a decade.
Lots of questions about why I compared 2021 to 2019 (not 2020) in the first graphic.
Application numbers vary over the course of the season - but the start of the 2020 season was delayed. So to to make an apples-to-apples comparison, I went back a year.
Also - these aren’t my data. They’re from the AAMC, and they’re available to anyone who wants to splice them a different way.
It’s one thing for an insurer to DENY a claim. But why do so many insurers expend such effort to DELAY payment, even for justified claims they know they have to pay?
If you didn’t know already, let me teach you about “float.”
Look, even before the Step 2 CS cancellation, my DMs and email were flooded with messages from osteopathic medical students who are fed up with the NBOME.
There is *real* anger toward this organization. Honestly, more than I even heard about from MD students and the NBME.
The question is, will that sentiment translate into action?
Amorphous anger on social media is easy to ignore. But if that anger gets channeled into organized efforts to facilitate change, then improvements are possible.
The reason a physician in graduate medical education training is called a “resident” is because back in the day, they *literally* lived in the hospital.
(a short thread)
One text recommended two medical and two surgical residents per 100 beds, a number which would “prove sufficient for all purposes.”
(If you’re wondering why the residents lived on the upper floors, it’s because “in case of fire, they, being in good health, could easily escape.”)
But that’s not all.
A century ago, residency had no fixed time endpoint - training could last any amount of time.
Most programs also had a ‘pyramid’ structure, in which many interns competed for fewer resident positions at each level and ultimately just one chief resident spot.
The AAMC has recommended that residency programs offer only virtual interviews for the upcoming season.
Who wins, and who loses? Let’s find out!
(thread)
WINNER: Homegrown applicants.
Every year, many students choose to stay at the same institution for residency. Many PDs will be eager to snap up these “known quantities” from an otherwise more uncertain applicant pool.
LOSER: DOs and IMGs, who may not have a “home” program.
WINNER: Student travel budgets.
Previously, many applicants spent upwards of five figures traveling to in-person interviews. You gotta try *really* hard to spend that kind of money sitting in your living room doing Zoom and WebEx interviews.