In my view lockdowns absolutely were needed in the beginning.
We weren’t ready.
People think that getting ready means vaccinate & that is partly the solution. We should have also been spending the last 18 months teaching people how to wear respirators, and cleaning the air.
Lockdowns still have a place in disease management… in countries that don’t have access to vaccines, in case of a resistant variant, and early in an outbreak to try and get ahead of the curve… but they are a very blunt instrument. Severe side effects.
The side effects of lockdown in an unvaccinated population are small compared to not locking down though.
But… if we have continuous settings that work to suppress disease transmission. Like ventilation and respirators… even early outbreaks may not propagate as well. ->
This gives TTI a much better chance of working.
I absolutely agree that transmission science based interventions should be in place at all times, until the global threat of COVID-19 is reduced. It’s much more tolerable than trying to manage without.
I said at the beginning of the NSW outbreak… “I bet we will have curfews before we have community respirators”… and sadly that’s exactly what we did have.
The curfews may have helped, but the respirators really could have been tried out. So effective. So simple.
In our extended family, we have lost 10 people to the coronavirus itself &one elderly person died alone, not visited for 2 months, due to an interminable lockdown.
I strongly believe the lockdown was necessary, but I do wonder if science could have been used to make it shorter.
Cleaning the air, wearing respirators or better fitting masks together with vaccines is the way forward. These measures will stabilise society, aid recovery, return freedoms, and make everyone feel like they are working together, to a real solution.
If the government would oblige by keeping TTI, that would also be very helpful. Many governments are scaling this back however, so if you find yourself out on your own… vaccination, ventilation, HEPA, and respirators are the way forward.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every single MP should be made aware of what the potential damage could be. From the confirmed neuropathology and autoimmune issues, to the projected pathology and human lifespan we may expect. ->
This is critical for future planning in every area of life, from what age people should plan to start a family, to how mortgages and life insurance should be planned.
I don’t believe we need to be locked down forever to achieve it and there is good evidence for that.
I don’t believe it is a permanent state. Mitigations are needed at all times for many years so they need to be smart and tolerable.
When we have defeated COVID-19, and it will happen at some point in time, there will be other pandemics and epidemics. Other airborne diseases.
So no,life isn’t going to be perfectly safe again. It never was in the past. We can deal with it though, & maybe make it even better.
Better vaccines will come. Therapeutics are being made. We know how these viruses get about, and we know how to stop them getting about. Plenty to be hopeful about.
Doctors used to say kids don’t need anaesthetic or painkillers… because they did not recognise pain in very young children.
Kids do need protection from COVID-19. The very young may take years to be able to tell us what is happening.
If a child is younger but developmentally capable to wear a mask, I think it should be gently encouraged.
If developmental delay becomes apparent, you can refer to a specialist and work on the problem to help catch up. There are many ways to prevent it too. Clear masks, daily reading time etc.
CDC defines influenza as an epidemic disease. Even though it has been around for ages, and is never truly gone from the earth, it comes and goes in waves. COVID-19 will likely be similar.
Endemic illness stays at a constant level roughly.
I don’t think you can just decide to call something endemic at an arbitrary point in time… it has to show some characteristics of steady rate of disease.
I hope we don’t chose to allow COVID-19 to be at very high endemic levels, or have large epidemics. Would be better if it was sporadic outbreaks. Much safer.
All I have to say to this incredibly monstrous strategy is… the UK is actually just making more straw to burn.
A significantly weakened herd will be fighting the flu/rsv/rhinovirus etc this year.
Why would you try to protect a health system, instead of protecting people when you could do both by keeping case numbers low and incentivising vaccination?