Prediction: the US is going to economic war with China

Short thread on my thinking re: this video

tiktok.com/@financeyujie/…
1. She mentions that power has been cut in Guangdong and Jiangsu in Autumn, which is past peak power usage (for southern Jiangsu anyways) as Guangdong is pretty warm, they spend more power on A/C than heating. AFAIK power has not been cut in Shandong and north.
2. To me that indicates that it has nothing to do with a shortage. And in fact she says it has nothing do with a shortage (this woman who is pretty hot imo does not strike me as being unaffiliated with the government). She says it is 3 things:
A. It's to cut emissions. That...kind of makes sense, but not really because China's air really gets bad later when they have to fire up those power plants up north to keep people warm. But yeah, Xi wants to cut emissions so this is sincere.
B. It's to optimize domestic industry. I think China wants to be less reliant on exports and wants to spur domestic consumption. I have heard that the more tax you pay the more electricity you are getting. Who pays tax? Companies selling domestically. Who doesn't? Exporters.
C. This is a big fuck you to the United States (kind of justified in my mind actually). When the US prints a shit ton of money and gives it to companies as we did with PPP and all the other crazy programs, inflation happens. Period. To say otherwise is a violation the laws of
physics (ie conservation of mass). I don't care what these economics academics say. They're wrong. It causes inflation. By the Cantillon effect, inflation affects people different according to when the money hits them. The money got dumped to the United States first.
So what happened? American companies, flush with cash were able to bid up the prices of raw materials AND buy from Chinese exporters. Chinese got squeezed because their costs went up (most contracts are on fixed year long contracts) but their sales prices didn't.
Further, they get paid much later than they start production, let's say 3-4 months later. By the time the Chinese actually get the money, it's value has been inflated. Cantillon effect. Huge advantage to the United States.

So what is China going to do about this?
They're going to harm their exporters and shift them towards domestic consumption and then they're going to create big price spikes in the USA knowing that we're too slow-footed to know what's going on and knowing that inflation begets more inflation driven by human psychology.
Think toilet paper. There is no shortage. People just hoard it because it's never in stock.

So sorry for threading this out in a way that fucks your timelines but whatever.

/end thread
Bonus tweet: One thing I forgot to mention: China is sitting on massive amounts of US treasuries (another reason they are pissed that the USA printed mad coins) and they can use this money to buy coal, so don't tell me it's a coal shortage.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Molson Hart

Molson Hart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Molson_Hart

17 Oct
How to go from broke to middle class in America (without becoming a musician, a professional athlete, or selling drugs):
Middle Class.

What does that mean?

We're going to call it $50,000 cash in your bank account.

The goal of this thread is to take YOU from broke to $50,000 cash in your bank account.

Let's start:
Accept that other people have a head start on you in life.

Life is not fair and it never will be.

It doesn't matter. You will catch up.
Read 97 tweets
15 Oct
Our department of transportation secretary has been on leave since mid august 🤯

Amidst the greatest supply chain crisis this nation has ever seen Mayor Pete was on leave.

I thought that this was fake, that he was being scapegoated but it looks real.
Mystery solved @Bannedforself Image
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
Can a country become sustainably rich without a sizable manufacturing base?

Ways to get rich:

- resource extraction
- tourism
- financial services
- service outsourcing
- software
- manufacturing
- something else I’m missing?

1/n
There’s something special about manufacturing. It taps into all of your human capital. Compare it to tourism. Your people oriented people work the hotels and restaurants. You get a small construction industry, a bit of marketing but that’s it.

2/n
Whereas for manufacturing, your people oriented people do sales, some people can work the plants, you can have designers, managers (yes you get these with tourism too), software, and construction. All your human capital gets tapped.

3/n
Read 6 tweets
12 Oct
Huge bear market in office RE (adjusted for inflation and covered land plays) coming.

It’s not even arguable otherwise. Let’s move on. We’re done.

What is interesting is the follow on effects!

1/2
- less commuting will hurt non-destinational retail eg “never mind picking that up on the way back from work.”
- what happens to downtown office cores?
- what do we do with these buildings?
- do homes need to be redesigned bigger?

What else? It’s pretty interesting!

2/3
Just so we’re clear, I am not saying no one will go to an office. I am saying a many fewer people will. I don’t know what the percentage is but the fewer people go to the office the less of a benefit you get from going yourself so WFH has a negative network effect.

3/3
Read 4 tweets
8 Oct
The worst experience I've ever had on Twitter!

A lot of people have been asking me what happened, so here's a 🧵of how fucked up Twitter can get, not only for you, but for your family.
It all started at dinner when I decided to calculate the living expenses of someone I know.

I was amazed at how high they were considering how poorly he lived for what he was spending.

I thought to myself, "hmm this is interesting, I'll tweet it."

It went viral.

Most people didn't understand my point (which was not well articulated) and thought that I was suggesting that spending over $1mm/year was not extravagant.

And the guillotines came out.
Read 20 tweets
7 Oct
Economies and diseconomies of scale in management.

0 Employees.

With no one to manage, there is no one with whom to communicate. You will never be more efficient.

1/n
1 employee.

You now must communicate what, how, and why to the employee you manage. Efficiency falls from this communication. However, accountability is high because everything that happens in the department can be attributed to the one person.

2/n
2 employees.

Huge dropoff in efficiency, because, not only do the two employees need to communicate between themselves and you, but you need to know who is responsible for what. You must observe closely to reward fairly or no one will work hard.

3/n
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(