UK government's "net zero" plan is a pathetic, criminal evasion of responsibility. By rejecting borrowing and placing the whole burden of investment on private sector, @RishiSunak guarantees failure...
... there is no radical modal change in energy consumption. The investment figure is way less than promised by @RachelReevesMP - this is the planet being destroyed by public school-to-Oxbridge-to-HMT assholes right before your eyes...
... Sunak's plan issued in the knowledge that the Tory voting base don't give a **** about future generations, the planet, global south weather catastrophes... but a progressive majority in the UK does...
... are we going to stay divided; bickering over party loyalties while some of the richest, dumbest and cruellest people on the planet connive in its destruction?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Mason

Paul Mason Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulmasonnews

3 Oct
Johnson's pitch to workers is crystal clear: your wages will rise because we've kept the migrants out. But there'll be no care workers, no petrol, not enough gas, so prices will rise faster than wages, but nothing I can do about that, it's the market, see...
... there is no chance whatsoever of "uncontrolled migration" - not even under Free Movement was the rest of migration "uncontrolled". It's fear-stoking culture war and as the polls show it is working...
... but Tory support is fragile. There's rising discontent among C2DE voters over transport, energy, government performance and even Brexit... but it doesn't translate into Labour support. Why?...
Read 9 tweets
28 Sep
#Lab21 balance sheet. 1/ 80% of the members voted for PR after a long left+right campaign, substantially led by @labourlewis. A few union delegates had power to squash it - but when the time comes to form a Labour-led coalition, if consulted, the members will back it...
2/ So this is a major change in British politics, and driven from below. Defying the bureaucracy the members signalled to other parties they understand: we cannot govern alone, and need urgent constitutional change...
3/ @RachelReevesMP commitment to a £224bn climate investment spend also strategic win - a direct response to the consistent Green polling around 6%. This too is the building block for a governing coalition with Greens/PC/SNP...
Read 15 tweets
26 Sep
Starmer's rule changes, already watered down, pass by just 53/47... can't see the breakdown but I assume that means constituency vote was even closer or went the other way... huge bonfire of political capital that will only benefit a right-wing challenger ...
2/ ... and given the branch shutdowns, union backroom deals needed to achieve even this, I can see this being reversed fairly easily if the left advances in Unison...
3/ Added to this the Green New Deal motion ruled out of order a week ago just passed. The left needs to create a single Labour entity that new people can join up to and participate in...
Read 4 tweets
26 Sep
Starmer #Marr interview leaves a random selection of Labour faces here in Brighton pretty dour... energy nationalisation is the only possible solution: you can't run the National Grid as a co-op... 1/
2/ Rayner's "scum" comment reflects exactly how working class people talk - and how many voters want to see the super-rich crooks characterised ... yet Keir couldn't bring himself to endorse it...
3/ There's already quite a bit of disquiet over the rule change SNAFU - even among the Labour right... who are rightly obsessed with speaking outside the bubble ...
Read 6 tweets
25 Sep
Labour's NEC is proposing that future leadership candidates need 1/5 of all existing MPs... here's why that should be stopped: 1/ it's designed to stifle the left only... the membership is way to the left of the PLP...
2/ It entrenches machine politics. The PLP is already substantially bereft of people who could feasibly govern, or make a convincing speech - but now all you have to do is network at Westminster...
3/ ... it stifles original voices and ideas: most truly competitive fields - business, the arts, sport - are led by talented misfits with the flair and passion to excel... the list of great potential Labour PMs we never had will grow ...
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep
Labour's attempt to ditch one-member-one-vote is, of course, a massive diversion from the important debates: Green New Deal and constitutional reform... but defeating it is vital... 1/ We're not in the 1970s anymore...
2/ I fought against OMOV in the 90s, because CLPs were sparse, inactive while unions were still (just) activist organisations, whose members could pressure bureaucrats through mass action...
3/ Today, I see OMOV as vital to Labour's transition from a Labourist party to a radical social democracy ... in a networked society, with multiple forms of exploitation, the individual activist should be sovereign...
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(