Thread by @RealKellyJones

.@jack

A court if law has ordered me not to post anything on social media that would “embarrass” Alex Jones.

Might this unconstitutional content-based prior restraint injunction against me also infringe on Twitter’s 1st Amendment/ protections/privileges?

#legaltwitter? 👇

Question simplified:

Can the court of impose terms of service (“TOS”) on a private corporation that has its own TOS?

Facts:

1)Twitter’s terms TOS do not incl the vague, unconstitutional bars on my #FreeSpeech imposed by the court.

2) Corporations’ protections seem to apply.

Another Question:

Does alerting the public that Alex Jones has unconstitutionally infringed on my #FreeSpeech by having non-considered orders entered in secrecy & under seal “embarrass” him?

Breaking this down. Alex Jones posts content that would embarrass most people: defamation of #SandyHook children, obscene & lewd commentary, misogynistic rants, hard drug usage, million $ murder bounties.

Considering the meaning of “embarrass,” what might be embarrassing?

*bounty, I guess. A million dollars for an attorney’s “head on a pike.” To millions of people, so is that one or multiple murder bounties?… oh, as related to his discovery responses containing child porn, to my recollection.

Embarrassing. Horrible:
google.com/amp/s/www.nbcn…

Question: Is it embarrassing to Alex Jones if I post this article stating that the #january6 panel investigating #Trump & Rudy Giuliani for #Insurrection is also investigating him?

google.com/amp/s/www.forb…