ASG Aishwarya Bhati informs the #SupremeCourt that the expert committee has suggested no change to water level is required in the Mullaperiyar dam case.
Justice AM Khanwilkar: one is the stability of the dam and the committee should take proactive steps with regard to that and also steps needs to be taken so that zero loss is caused whether due to floods or anything else. Tell us regarding this.
ASG: Please check the internal page of the report. It says raising the level from 136 to 142 feet will lead to jeopardising the issue. Then studies were asked to be conducted by National Disaster Management Authority
ASG: Expert committee noted obstructionist view on part of the state of Kerala
SC: this was observed during 2006. now we are on 2021 .is the threat level same/ has the committee examined this or not?
ASG: one was instrumentation and performance of the dam and then was gate operation schedule and reservoir operation plant. Status report was asked on this and status report has been filed by now. Committee & Tamil Nadu agree on operational point and Kerala differs
SC: Who will decide this?
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: the mullaperiyar dam is itself the cause of flooding
SC: How can dam save you from heavy rain?
Gupta: discharge of water in certain level creates flood
Gupta: we had stated this before the committee and the committee had disagreed. allow us to file a three-page note so that you can peruse it.
Sr Adv Shekhar Naphade: all their concerns are misplaced
SC: What we can say is that maintain the level and we decide the issue tomorrow morning
Naphade: it can be taken after vacations.... rainfall has abated now.
Sr Adv Naphade: the continuous campaign is going on in Kerala
SC: The application is reflective of that
Adv Wills Mathew argues
SC: You either wear the mask properly or remove it completely, its distracting.
Mathew: Kerala is not against giving water to Tamil nadu as per old agreement .... after independence...
SC: Don't start arguing the matter...
Mathew: Instead of focusing on the height of the dam focus should be on volume of water
SC: Isn't the height because of the volume of water.. what is this?
Adv G Prakash for Kerala: we can file the note by tomorrow
SC: Do it by tonight
Prakash: okay My Lord. we will do it
Prakash: we will file it by 10,30 am tomorrow
SC: Okay, we will have this tomorrow at 2 pm for Kerala to file a written note (response to the minutes of meeting by the expert committee and report prepared thereafter)
Wankhede counsel: No consent has been taken from the State. If Mumbai Police arrest me today, which is my apprehension, milords will not wait till the State flouts my rights.
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: the plea before you is the Joe Joseph vs State of Tamil Nadu. Parties have resolved differences apart from what height has to be maintained and what height should be of the reservoir level so that Tamil Nadu can draw some water
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: As per the rule curb prepared by state of kerala it indicates the levels which has to be maintained at different dates ... this takes into account the rainfall which has taken place for several years.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a challenge to the amendments to the FCRA and the rule mandating opening of an NGO's primary account in New Delhi SBI main branch #FCRA
Right to life and liberty under Article 21 does not encompass the right to receive unregulated foreign contributions, the Central government had told the Supreme Court while defending amendments made in 2020 to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA)
The plea by Noel Harper of NGO Care And Share Charitable Trust challenged Sections 7, 12A, 12(1A) and 17 inserted in the FCRA by the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as ultra vires Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India #SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by the NTA challenging a Bombay High Court order halting the declaration of results of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for under graduate courses #NEETUG2021#NEETresults
SG Tushar Mehta appearing for the National Testing Agency #NEETResults
Counsel for the respondent : wrong answer sheet was given to us and wrong answers were given to questions. Then questions were attempted in hurry... The only solution was leniency. It was like a common order passed by HC.
#SupremeCourt to hear an application alleging violation of the order dated February 10, 2017 banning use of certain chemicals such as barium nitrite that is dangerous & beyond safety limits used by firecracker manufacturers #firecrackers
SC: When the earlier order of banning firecrackers was passed, it was passed after giving reasons. All crackers were not banned. : It was in larger public interest. It should not be projected that it was banned for particular purpose.
SC: Last time we said that we weren’t coming in way of enjoyment but we cannot come in way of Fundamental rights...