Russia’s trade policy review—Day 1, Oct 27. Day 2: today.

These are periodic peer-review sessions (every 5 years for Russia), based on reports from the @wto Secretariat (factual) and the government being reviewed.

See wto.org/english/tratop…

1/15
From a Geneva trade official:

Comments Day 1: > 40 members + 1 observer (Serbia)

Briefly:
POSITIVE—Russia is constructive in @wto and for the coming Ministerial Conference
NEGATIVE—Import substitution policies, the role of the state in Russian economy

2/15
US: recognises steps taken in @wto, but concerns about turning inward, contrary to the principles—non-discrimination, predictability, transparency, fair competition, under import substitution and forced localization.

Includes investment, IT, SPS, government procurement

3/15
EU: Russia’s constructive role not unnoticed, including participation in “plurilateral” talks. But concern about import substitution, questionable retaliation against political sanctions, closed government procurement, large state role, export restrictions.

4/15
CANADA: similar.

Concerns about: state dominance in key sectors eg, transport, energy, banking; lack of transparency, different rules applying to state corporations

Praise for: decision to reduce state-owned enterprises—Russia should decrease their total assets

5/15
Switzerland: Russia’s diversification away from natural resources and commodities, eg, hydrocarbons, raises concerns because of export subsidies and import substitution, including financial support to exporters. Also concerns about state enterprises.

6/15
Japan: Praise—legal system reform, cooperation with Japan, growing bilateral trade

Concern—localisation/local content policies, including requirement to use Russian ships (and possibly Russian-made ships) to transport resources. Policies need to be predictable, transparent

7/15
Ukraine complained of economic and trade pressure as part of Russia’s “aggression”, unilateral suspension of the free trade agreement, and unjustified restrictions on Ukraine products (bans or unjustified technical regulations, labelling, hygiene or safety requirements).

8/15
China: positive—economic diversification, attracting investment, legislative improvements, support for the trading system and #WTOReform, countering trade protectionism, participating in regional integration, contributing to negotiations especially on fisheries subsidies

9/15
India: positive—reforms in legal framework eg, customs procedures, export taxes, public procurement, foreign investment, competition, intellectual property protection, energy, financial and telecommunications services, collaboration on COVID-19 including vaccines

10/15
Russia (Senior official Ekaterina Mayorova)—the multilateral trading system is undermined by politics, tensions and unilateral actions by some members. Russia is committed to the rules-based @wto system and has cut tariffs since the last review (2016)

12/15
She said Russia has had to act for food security to guarantee a level of domestic production, a concern shared by many countries, exacerbated by sanctions—it has not raised import duties or banned imports and its agricultural subsidies are within its agreed limits.

13/15
She denied that Russia discriminates in favour of its state enterprises. All companies come under the same laws and taxes, except a few public monopolies, she said. She cited the reduction in Gazprom’s market share to less than 50% of domestic consumption.

14/15
35 members asked Russia 1,017 written questions.

All the reports and related documents on Russia’s latest trade policy review can be found here ⬇️.

More to be added later including (in a few months) the minutes and written questions and answers

15/15 wto.org/english/tratop…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

30 Oct
A lot going on this weekend: summits in Rome (G20) and Glasgow (climate change).

Also:

Exactly one month before the @wto Ministerial Conference #MC12 starts in Geneva. The prospects are improving marginally, but still not great.

ICYMI with updates

1/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/30/wto…
@BobWolfeSPS and I remain sceptical that the Ministerial Conference will deliver much of significance out of the broad range of critical problems confronting the @wto

2/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/30/wto… Image
More positive: a possible deal on curbing harmful fisheries subsidies—fingers firmly crossed

20 years talking past each other, 2020 deadline missed—until the UN Climate Change summit #COP26 and WTO Ministerial Conference #MC12 loomed

But no details

3/7 wto.org/english/news_e…
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct
Quite a long thread on the China’s public response to its @wto Trade Policy Review

Lots of detail including:
1. comments covered by WTO rules: China will take seriously and fulfill them,
2. comments beyond WTO rules: unfair, unreasonable, and unacceptable for China.

1/3
The comments came from WTO members. China responded in the meeting too.

Trade policy reviews are periodic peer-review sessions (every 3 years for China, US, EU and Japan). They are based on factual Secretariat reports.

2/3 @wto’s web page on the review: wto.org/english/tratop…
Here are two threads from @fbermingham on some of the comments members made and China’s response, inside the @wto trade policy review of China, on days 1 and 2.

Minutes will be published in a few months.

3/3
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct
ANNUAL REPORT: The @wto #Services Council (=full membership overseeing work under the General Agreement on Trade in Services, GATS)

It's 10 pages so just a highlight

#TradeInServices

1/4 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
Electronic commerce and services:

This now covers 3 areas

1. The moratorium on tax on cross-border electronic commerce (a topic as old as the WTO itself)

2. “Invigorated” discussion on boosting digital capability, from this paper: docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…

2/4
3. The on-going friction over negotiations in a sub-group of only part of the membership (“#plurilateral” talks, officially “joint-statement initiatives”, JSIs, seen as a way to progress when the membership is deadlocked) versus objections.

“A couple” = India and SAfrica

3/4
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct
Remember that ground-breaking 🇬🇧 UK-Japan 🇯🇵 trade deal?

The one that was so much better than the 🇪🇺 EU-Japan 🇯🇵 deal because the names of 70 British products would now be protected?

🇬🇧 Stornoway Black Pudding, Wensleydale, English sparkling wine, Scotch beef and more?

1/14 Image
Remember—from a year ago today—this ⬇️ with @GregHands and @EvanHD?

The claim: this is better than the EU-Japan deal—because it easier to protect additional British geographical indications.

2/14
Here’s ⬇️ what @GregHands told @EvanHD on @BBCPM:

“Up to 70” UK names to be protected.

“Things like Stornoway Black Pudding, the potential for Wensleydale Cheese, English Sparkling Wine, Scotch Beef etc, etc”

4/14 Image
Read 16 tweets
21 Oct
The reaction among trade experts to US Trade Representative Katherine Tai’s speech in Geneva on Oct 14 has been mixed.

Some welcomed the optimistic tone. Others were disappointed at the lack of specifics.

1/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/21/opt…
The debate between the optimists and pessimists focuses most on this part of Tai’s answer to a question.

The optimists were encouraged by: “If you will listen to us, we will listen to you, and let’s start the reform process from there.”

2/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/21/opt…
But perhaps this part is more damning: “over the course of those 15 years, not enough members listened.”

3/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/21/opt…
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
WTO members met again as the intellectual property council today, both formally and informally.

BOTTOM LINE:

One year after it was proposed, NO CHANGE IN POSITIONS on the proposal to waive some intellectual property protection for COVID-19,

#TRIPSWaiver stalemate

1/7 Image
Stalemate should come as no surprise.

FOR—suspending protection will allow countries to copy vaccines and other products

AGAINST—other solutions are effective, protection is needed as incentives for innovation, no evidence that a #TRIPSWaiver will help transfer technology

2/7
More interesting (1)—the US

According to sources: US said

• it appreciated both sides’ efforts
• members should focus only on vaccines to ensure consensus
• seek solutions likely to gain consensus

Does that signal the US’ own position?

3/7 #TRIPSWaiver
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(