On a 5-3 vote, the Supreme Court — unlike in other cases — jumped in to reverse a lower court’s procedural decision, this time in a case that means a man almost certainly will be killed by the state of Oklahoma tonight.
In its first execution in 7 years, since the botched execution of Clayton Lockett, it appears questions must be asked about this Oklahoma execution as well.
The execution of Clayton Lockett led to a state review that showed what a complete disaster the state’s execution process was. buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisg…
Seven years later. Here we go again.
More on today’s Oklahoma execution from my former co-worker on the death penalty beat, @csmcdaniel:
Here is video of @apseanmurphy describing the execution of John Grant that he witnessed today in Oklahoma.
One correction from earlier in the thread. I forgot that Oklahoma actually did go through with one execution after the Lockett execution, that of Charles Warner in Jan. 2015, which they also screwed up. npr.org/sections/thetw…
So, today’s execution of John Grant was the first by Oklahoma in nearly seven years, and the second since the botched Lockett execution.
This is what the US Supreme Court allowed to happen today. What happened during Oklahoma’s execution of John Grant was precisely why the 10th Circuit had put the execution on hold. The US Supreme Court, with no opinion, allowed this pain to be inflicted upon Grant.
Here is yesterday’s opinion from the 10th Circuit — documents.deathpenaltyinfo.org/Jones-v-Crow-1… — and here, in part, is why the lower court issued a stay:
When Sam Alito whines about critical media coverage of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket being unfair, play him this video.
An unresolved issue in the case was “the adequacy of the consciousness check,” which was then used today — minutes after Grant was still vomiting — to then justify the state injecting him with the second drug that killed him. Again, from the 10th Circuit opinion:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Geidner

Chris Geidner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrisgeidner

22 Oct
BREAKING: SCOTUS will hear both the DOJ and Whole Woman’s Health challenges to Texas SB8 law strictly limiting abortion in the first six weeks and allowing private enforcement actions. The Supreme Court will NOT put SB8 on hold while it considers the cases. Arguments on Nov. 1.
Here’s the grant in Whole Woman’s Health:
Here’s the grant in DOJ’s challenge. Note the question presented:
Read 6 tweets
22 Oct
I’m stuck in Schiphol because my flight to Paris just got canceled, AMA.
I have 5 hours in Schiphol, but am rebooked for this afternoon!
Lollll. That flight was delayed 90 minutes, left the gate finally, and is now returning because of a mechanical issue. 🥴
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
So, I guess the big question is: “Is HBO actually ready for tonight?”
HERE WE GO. #Succession
Gimme that theme music! 🤤🤗🤪
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
Am I going to make my brain explode by reading all of this bullshit, or am I going to actually enjoy my night?
Lol. These jerks doing the "DRAFT" thing and not giving us the documents in a way that we can highlight or copy and paste.
tell me you're embarrassed by your work without telling me you're embarrassed by your work
Read 11 tweets
14 Oct
OK, I'm leaving on a plane for Paris a week from now?! Recommendations?! (I'm only there for four days, but please send me your ideas!)
Spending Saturday night with @mikasounds — at the @philharmonie — but the rest of the time is open. ☺️
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
I’ll be listening to the Tsarnaev #SCOTUS arguments at 10 — arguments that wouldn’t be happening if the admin acted on its alleged death penalty opposition. But here we are: Biden’s DOJ is fighting to reinstate a death sentence that a lower court said was reached inappropriately.
Arguments are available here: supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments…
*EK enters the chat*
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(