To understand Rakesh Jhunjhunwala’s thinking, let us explore this article - includes the presentation that he apparently made in front of PM @narendramodi recently.
(Some graphs are created by TOI, and are not part of the presentation. Behind paywall)
First thing to notice is that RJ sees a clear trend towards faster growth in India over the last half century. One can quibble over the numbers but the trend is your friend (until it isn’t.)
I had a similar graph on my substack except it was on per capita growth rates.
The more important thing to notice is that RJ thesis is based on not some narrow financial understanding but a holistic economic history, geo-political and sociological-anthropological basis as well (again, quibbles aside.) That’s the only way to test a view and build confidence.
His view is based on demographics, global factors but above all the confidence in the democratic Indian state becoming more competent and delivering on more promises (partially because of technology.) His confidence in democracy led him to not being overly pessimistic in 2012-13.
He focuses on the tolerance (rather pluralism) of our people, and a drive towards entrepreneurship and education (though starting from a low, forced base) - which in turn underwrites the unity of the Indian state. He talks about our nukes, and about geography being less relevant.
He talks about reforms like GST/IBC/farm/labour/power/real estate, JAM/India Stack (digital public goods), social infra, privatisation, agri yields scope, global low rates, corp tax cuts and overall buoyancy, software, pharma, China+1 opportunity, virtuous cycles of growth/capex.
He ends on a high note and with some suggestions. India has tried crony socialism and failed, and will now double down on success. He quotes @anandmahindra, Mark Twain and others.
No of airports, metros, dedicated freight corridors, semi high speed lines, expressways, highways, roads, ports, sanitation/sewage systems, electricity/drinking water last mile networks on top of “soft” infra, digital public goods is incredible. More to come #LongIndia#NewIndia
2015-2025 will be the decade when we connected the last billion Indians to national and global economy. It wouldn’t be something that only the rich or the middle classes can do anymore. The deluge of human productivity and aspirations that this is releasing is just mind boggling.
Imagine a now rural or ‘rurban’ household which within the next 3-5 years can afford a made-in-India AC, washing machine, microwave, EV 2W etc, can order for goods/food online. Imagine change in women’s lives especially- and if more of them are educated, decide to join workforce.
RBI's Economic Activity Index (EIA) indicates that real GDP grew by 9.6 per cent in July-Sep 2021.
Q1FY22 was at 20.1%. So ~7.5% is already baked in cake; two quarters to go. Many estimates will be revised upwards. They overcorrected for second wave - and are conceptually wrong.
In fact, the second wave has all but guaranteed (along with other factors) that FY23 is also likely to see ~double digit real growth. Ultimately growth is both path dependent *and* based on factors of production. COVID is a unique (and tragic) macro-econ experiment in that sense.
“In the next fiscal year (FY2022-23), consensus expects output to be 8% higher than in FY2019-20, whereas output today might already be 13% higher” by @neelkanthmishra
Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Apartheid South Africa, Jim Crow America - these labels are being used to defame India, Sangh Parivar, PM Modi, BJP CMs, Hindutva, Dharma etc.
But nearly everyday actual killings happen in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan and within India - Kashmir.
A peaceful boycott of a company - a right of all consumers - is termed terrorism, but actual physical-real, flesh-blood, life-death terrorism is not called so.
Words have no meaning, like they have not had under Gandhian-Nehruvian secularism for some time.
Truly it is all maya.
There is zero empathy to even try to understand another's point of view. Consider Bangladesh (originally East Bengal) where Hindus have been consistently driven out for decades. But in West Bengal the party which the majority of Hindus vote for doesn't get to form the government.
It is important to understand that China gets India's economic potential in another decade precisely because they did it themselves; they know when India gets the playbook on growth as it has under PM Modi. Corollary is that sabotage attempts are inevitable. Do keep that context.
Pakistan is but a manifestation of its highest ideal: the Jihadi. It is a small economy that has chosen self-harm to get parity with Kafir India and Kafir China is happy to play along. But threat is from China and an open society/polity like India is vulnerable to disinformation.
Whatever great humanist and universalist ideals India has, and we can continue to discuss that, can only be achieved if India itself becomes great. There should be an unapologetic aim to become a great power, a superpower. And greatness never comes cheap. It never has-never will.
"The Dharmasutra of Āpastamba forms a part of the larger Kalpasūtra of Āpastamba. It contains thirty praśnas, which literally means questions or books. The subjects of this Dharmasūtra are well organized and preserved."
Praśṇa I, Paṭala 1, Khaṇḍa 1
... 4. four castes--Brāhmaṇas, Kṣatriyas, Vaiśyas, and Śūdras.
5. Amongst these, each preceding is superior by birth to the one following.
6. excepting Śūdras and those who have committed bad actions, the initiation, the study of the Veda
...
Praśna I, Paṭala 1, Khaṇḍa 3
25. Bringing all he obtains to his teacher, he shall go begging with a vessel in the morning and in the evening, (and he may) beg (from everybody) except low-caste people unfit for association (with Āryas) and Abhiśastas.
In Rajasthan, the Congress government is trying to register child marriages and the BJP is vociferously opposed. When people ask what is Hindu modernity, well, this is Hindu modernity.
Bal Gangadhar Tilak opposed the increase of marriage age consent to 12 during colonial times. One can understand both sides of the argument there since we didn’t rule ourselves. But to pretend - as many do that we are not free anymore, however imperfectly - is to fool oneself.
How should we approach such an issue? For some groups, making forcing girls to get married before they turn women maybe optimal from their point of view - as defined by some men. What about the individual women/girls? What about their rights? Or are their views of no consequence?