We need to talk about

🐂 cows
💨 carbon
🔥 climate change
& #COP26

1/🧵
Climate change is happening.

The world has warmed >1°c since the mid-C18th as a result of the anthropogenic (human) release of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere 🌍

This is already having devastating consequences around the world: just ask almost any farmer 🌪

2/
Some still claim climate change is either ‘fake news’ or caused by natural phenomena - sun cycles ☀️ volcanoes etc 🌋

This is untrue ❌

Since the human population exploded in the 1800s, atmospheric CO2 levels have risen to unprecedented levels…

3/
…in parallel with our industrial emissions.

Humans are the problem 👋

Awkward.

4/
Where do the vast majority of these emissions come from?

The burning of fossil fuels for energy to generate electricity, power our transport, produce our consumer goods and heat our homes 🏭 🚗 ✈️ 🏠

5/
But - isn’t it COWS that are actually the single biggest source of climate-warming emissions? I mean, that’s what the media says, right?

All we need to do is move to a ‘plant based diet’ to save the planet, right?

No. This is misleading, and dangerous.

6/
Climate change is already happening, but to keep it at ‘manageable’ levels, we must keep warming below 1.5°c

Current international commitments leave us closer to 3°c by 2100. This would be disastrous.

Think Mad Max 🏜

7/
So, back to cows.

They emit methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation as they ruminate - or chew the cud. (Cows are clearly thoughtful animals).

Essentially, CH4 is a byproduct of converting pretty indigestible (to us) grass into tasty beef & milk 🌱

8/
Methane is 28x more warming than CO2; this is important for farming because agriculture contributes more than half of all methane in the UK, primarily from ruminant digestion 🐄

BUT: CH4 also breaks down after c10 years, vs centuries for CO2 ⏳

9/
The warming potential of methane is calculated using the GWP100 metric, which assumes that CO2 has a warming score of 1, CH4 of 28 over 100 years (ie is 28x more warming over a century).

But this dismisses the fact that methane is a short-lived gas, inflating its impact.

10/
This many scientists now believe a new measurement is needed to accurately calculate the warming effect of CH4 in climate modelling - GWP*

This isn’t to deny methane is an important GHG, but that its impact is currently overstated vs CO2.

11/

clear.ucdavis.edu/blog/methane-g…
What’s more, the CH4 emitted by cattle (biogenic) is different to that released in the burning of fossil fuels 🔥

It’s part of the natural carbon cycle, where CH4 is broken down after 10 years into CO2, which is in turn recycled via photosynthesis & further rumination ♻️

12/
That makes biogenic methane a ‘flow gas’ - after ten years, a static population of cattle is creating no new warming as the gas constantly cycles.

In contrast, ‘stock gas’ CO2 remains in the atmosphere for centuries, adding constant warming with every year that passes.

13/
That’s why, despite the pandemic, atmospheric CO2 reached record levels in 2020.

Every tonne of CO2 which is burned is adding warming, and will do for centuries.

We would need to stop burning fossil fuels tomorrow - totally - to arrest this rise.

14/

theguardian.com/environment/20…
It’s also worth noting that the biggest global emitter of methane is (of course) the fossil fuel industry.

And unlike biogenic methane, this CH4 was safely buried, inert, in the ground (along with all that CO2) before we dug it up and flared it into the atmosphere 🔥

15/
With cattle, were we to make the national herd more efficient, or reduce their emissions through breeding/diet, we could (after a decade) induce a COOLING effect on the climate as that biogenic methane breaks down & is sequestered in biomass & soil.

16/

fginsight.com/news/news/a-20…
Additionally, not all livestock production is the same: it’s a sliding global scale of sustainability.

Beef produced in the ashes of the Amazon is unacceptable, for emissions & biodiversity reasons.

The grains fed in large global feedlots are also problematic.

17/
But British meat and dairy has a great story to tell, and is improving all the time in line with our Net Zero ambition.

If you want to reduce your consumption of unsustainable meat & dairy, just look to buy British. It’s high welfare, and ethical too 🇬🇧

18/
Why does this matter for #COP26 ?

Because if people are led to believe that going ‘meat free’ is making a meaningful contribution to the existential threat posed by climate change, they’re mistaken.

This distracts us from the bigger challenges we face & reduces action.

19/
And make no mistake, the consequences of failing to mitigate the worst excesses of anthropogenic climate change are truly dire.

20/

newsweek.com/climate-change…
What’s more, livestock are a critical part of sustainable regenerative farming systems.

They build soil health, provide vital organic nutrients, maintain grassland habitats and help sequester CO2 in the soil.

We need more, not less ruminants in our food system.

21/
It also goes without saying that red meat & dairy are vital in balanced, healthy diets the world over 🥩 🧀 🥛

22/
And let’s not forget - ANY food has an environmental footprint and can be produced on a sliding scale of sustainability.

Even the much lauded avocado can have a catastrophic impact on the environment, biodiversity & local communities 🥑

23/

sustainablefoodtrust.org/articles/why-o…
Sustainable farming - including livestock - is part of the solution to climate change, and I’m proud to be part of an industry which has a plan to achieve that with real activities, not just ‘offsetting’ and continuing business as usual.

24/
It’s time we stopped repeating the tired cliches about farting cows being the root cause of climate change.

Even using the flawed GWP100, ruminants DON’T account for 94% of the emissions in the economy.

It’s not the cows, stupid. It’s the everything else.

25/Ends 🐂

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Stanley

Joe Stanley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoeWStanley

13 Oct 20
Last night government defeated amendments to the #AgricultureBill which would have safeguarded our world leading #food & #farming standards.

Many @Conservatives MPs pledged to wear the wheatsheaf & #BackBritishFarming last month - inc my own.

A hollow & meaningless gesture.
It’s baffling that a 🇬🇧 govt is fighting tooth & nail to renege on its own manifesto commitment, sell out its farmers & inflict the dregs of the global food bargain basement on the poorest in our society. And for what? This? ⤵️

Massive respect & thanks to those dozen or so Conservative MPs who did vote to their conscience & honour their manifesto commitment, inc -

@neil_parish @Simon4NDorset @GeorgeFreemanMP @DrNeilHudson @JulianSturdy @SirRogerGale @Douglas4Moray @carolinenokes Teresa Villiers
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct 20
Government Ag policy has drifted into unreality.

A thread ⤵️

1/
Brexit has ensured that no British government in memory has lavished so many warm words on its farmers, but the reality of policy discussions behind the scenes often seems far more ambivalent towards the future of a £122bn food & farming industry.

2/

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Ultimately, government’s plan for post-Brexit farming does not work.

Removing globally universal state support for food production, increasing domestic standards & opening markets up to unfair competition = a devastating triple whammy for 🇬🇧 farmers.

3/
Read 11 tweets
2 Oct 20
61% of the average English Farm Business Income derives from the CAP’s direct support - with huge variation across sectors.

From 8% in intensive poultry to a whopping 114% for mixed farming.

From 2021, government is withdrawing this direct support to £0 by 2027.

1/8 Image
This direct financial support (to be found in most countries) allows UK farmers to produce some of the world’s cheapest food to the highest standards of safety, welfare & environmental sustainability.

Essentially, it underwrites our cheap food system.

2/8 ImageImage
To put it another way; arable (bread, cereals, beer) and grazed livestock (lamb, beef) farmers lose money on every tonne of grain or cow/sheep they produce (on average). Those who do both, lose the most!

But to this point, direct payments have kept the food coming 🍽

3/8 Image
Read 8 tweets
14 Jun 20
Distillation of the ‘free trade at all costs’ argument from @rcolvile in today’s Times.

There’s so much wrong with this argument in 2020 it’s hard to know where to begin, but let’s have a go...1/ Image
The economic right is obsessed with the historical example of the Corn Laws repeal (1846) as if that proves their every argument.

Trading historical vignettes, what about the near-catastrophic free market approach to food adopted pre-1914 & 1939?

2/
This was predicated on the imperial arrogance that ‘we are a rich nation & others will feed us’ by exploiting their workforce & land, not ours.

This view is back with a vengeance in 2020; financial services are in, farming is out. But you can’t eat money.

3/
Read 13 tweets
11 Jun 20
The battle over trade standards is political spin at its unedifying worst.

Nobody wants to see our high 🇬🇧 standards undercut, yet government is forced to tie itself in increasingly Gordian knots in an attempt to obfuscate & run down the clock [1/3]

fginsight.com/news/news/farm…
Indeed, only 12 months ago @DefraGovUK SoS Eustice was passionately arguing that:

“unless 🇺🇸 meets 🇬🇧 standards, it can join the back of the queue on trade.”

It was a @Conservatives manifesto commitment to maintain these standards [2/3]

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Yet it’s increasingly clear that, despite a lack of any public support for the policy, a bad trade outcome for food is on the cards.

Luckily, it can be stopped: if you care about the food on your plate, sign the @NFUtweets petition today 👏 [3/3]

countrysideonline.co.uk/back-british-f…
Read 4 tweets
6 Jun 20
There’s so much happening in 🌍 right now - including many tragedies - but farmers are asking you to lend your support to the campaign to protect 🇬🇧 food standards from being undercut in future trade deals.

Here’s why this is important & why you should care [1] Image
British #farmers produce your food to some of the highest standards of animal #welfare, environmental #sustainability & #safety in the 🌍

Many of these are 🇪🇺 standards. With #Brexit we are now free to alter them. But what does this mean? [2]
So domestic production standards are set to rise even higher, which is great (who doesn’t want quality?)

But govt looks set to conclude new trade deals with countries such as 🇺🇸 which would allow food imports which it would be illegal to produce here [3]

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(