Brexit has ensured that no British government in memory has lavished so many warm words on its farmers, but the reality of policy discussions behind the scenes often seems far more ambivalent towards the future of a £122bn food & farming industry.
Ultimately, government’s plan for post-Brexit farming does not work.
Removing globally universal state support for food production, increasing domestic standards & opening markets up to unfair competition = a devastating triple whammy for 🇬🇧 farmers.
ELM has been in development for four years, is referenced as the solution to all our problems, and yet seems to be little different to that which has gone before - and does nothing to address the looming crisis of farm profitability.
Despite the unequivocal experience of 2020 proving that UK citizens categorically will not ‘Pick for Britain’, this is still proposed as the solution to the >60,000 shortfall in migrant labour needed in our horticulture sector.
The excuse that we cannot implement standards on food imports as we may disadvantage developing countries seems to be less of an issue when it comes to imported sugar cane...
...where a planned £73m tariff break will allow the UK’s sole cane sugar producer (and government donor) to bypass developing economies from which they can already import tariff-free under EU rules.
Of course, the EU of 27 nations is the perfect trading partner when it comes to our lamb; they already take it and they are geographically next door. Unlike Kuwait.
But no stone seems to be now left unturned in demonising our most important agricultural trading partner.
I’m personally becoming incredibly tired of government MPs across the country pledging to back their farming constituents before promptly doing absolutely nothing in the voting lobbies to follow through - and then telling farmers to trust them, or that we ‘don’t understand.’
10/
We have it in our grasp to make 🇬🇧 agriculture the envy of the world.
But first government has to reconnect with reality & put its promises & commitments into legislation.
The Ag Bill returns to the Commons next week - and we’re in the last chance saloon.
11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
61% of the average English Farm Business Income derives from the CAP’s direct support - with huge variation across sectors.
From 8% in intensive poultry to a whopping 114% for mixed farming.
From 2021, government is withdrawing this direct support to £0 by 2027.
1/8
This direct financial support (to be found in most countries) allows UK farmers to produce some of the world’s cheapest food to the highest standards of safety, welfare & environmental sustainability.
Essentially, it underwrites our cheap food system.
2/8
To put it another way; arable (bread, cereals, beer) and grazed livestock (lamb, beef) farmers lose money on every tonne of grain or cow/sheep they produce (on average). Those who do both, lose the most!
But to this point, direct payments have kept the food coming 🍽
The battle over trade standards is political spin at its unedifying worst.
Nobody wants to see our high 🇬🇧 standards undercut, yet government is forced to tie itself in increasingly Gordian knots in an attempt to obfuscate & run down the clock [1/3]
There’s so much happening in 🌍 right now - including many tragedies - but farmers are asking you to lend your support to the campaign to protect 🇬🇧 food standards from being undercut in future trade deals.
Here’s why this is important & why you should care [1]
There’s a lot of talk around comparative 🇬🇧/🇺🇸 standards when it comes to #food and future #trade deals; but what do these differences mean in practice? ⤵️
🇺🇸 - No federal laws on hen welfare; voluntary guidelines suggest cages of 432 sq cm.
US 🍳 costs = 28% lower. That’s no yolk.
2/10
CHICKEN 🐓
🇬🇧 - Only potable water permitted to wash carcasses. Legal maximum stocking densities/AMR protocols apply.
🇺🇸 - No legal maximum stocking densities in major 🍗 producing states - Pathogen Reduction Treatments (eg chlorine dioxide) required to wash carcasses 🦠