There has been some interesting reporting of Sunday’s EU-US deal on steel and aluminium.

But the fact is, a lot of it is speculation because some details have not yet been revealed and negotiations on others have only just begun

(Thanks to various experts for the links)

1/10
First, a transcript of a White House briefing, including:

• The size of the tariff quotas—still to be announced
• The start of talks on a deal focusing on carbon intensity in the metals
• Avoiding Chinese content in EU steel—“melt-and-pour”

2/10 whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Next, @bentleyballan and @toddntucker in the Washington Post

Is this bigger than news from Glasgow? Will it transform the fight against climate change?

Depends on the outcome of negotiations, including how many other countries join in. Early days.

3/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Some trade experts have picked up this⬇️

Thoughts

• Yes WTO agreements are fundamentally political in the sense that trade policy is fundamentally political. What matters is the direction of the politics (unilateral? multilateral? something else?)

4/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
• Yes WTO agreements are open to change—that’s what negotiations do

But would this deal change WTO agreements?

The agreements have always allowed countries to strike their own deals—“WTO-plus”—provided they don’t hurt other WTO member countries

5/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Will the to-be-negotiated “global” deal put some countries at a disadvantage? Maybe.

The authors say that China (the main target) “may well meet and exceed the standards”—in which case, no problem. We’ll see.

6/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Will it won’t change WTO agreements? Only if the deal or its principles on carbon intensity is brought into the WTO.

We’re a long, long way away from from any of that.

7/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
The article concludes:

“Thus, the deal envisions both novel rules to green the steel sector with more traditional trade stabilization rules to guard against import floods.”

But the method is notorious tariff quotas —> economic rent and rent-seeking

8/10 washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Meanwhile, @StephenOlsonHF of the Hinrich Foundation, says the EU-US deal reinforces “managed trade” rather than “free trade”, which never existed.

He calls it “a job well done” but also “an affirmation of Trump’s approach to trade”

9/10 hinrichfoundation.com/research/artic…
“In any event, a recalibration of our approach to trade is underway,” he says

But the system isn’t only about freer trade. It’s also about rules-based trade policies. So a separate question: does this move weaken or strengthen multilateralism?

10/10 hinrichfoundation.com/research/artic…
Lots more interesting and detailed comment, private and public, today.

Here's another⬇️. A “managed-trade quagmire”.

“The only clear beneficiaries will be the European exporters lucky enough to win duty-free quota allocations (“rents”) and the lawyers.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

2 Nov
Latest in the #WTO #AgricultureNegotiations:

Chair @GloriaAbrahamP’s report circulated yesterday

“committee … special session” = negotiations

There still seems to be little chance of substantial agreement at the Nov30–Dec3 Ministerial Conference

1/7 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
So most if not all will be pushed into “work programmes” after the conference, in some cases simply to keep the talks going

• Trade distorting domestic support—still differences on the approach to reductions.

2/7 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
• Market access—nothing on tariff cuts, only transparency on applied tariffs (rates actually applied, at or below legally bound rates in the WTO)
• Export restrictions—notifications, exempting World Food Programme purchases from restrictions

3/7 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
Read 7 tweets
1 Nov
THE US-EU AGREEMENT ON STEEL AND ALUMINIUM

Yesterday’s joint statement is here: trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/20… (H/T @AmyPorges)

It has 3 parts:

1. Cooperation
2. Market orientation and carbon intensity (“green steel”)
3. WTO dispute settlement

1/7
1. COOPERATION

(For “non-market excess capacity” read “China”)

Cooperation on trade remedies (duties to countervail subsidies, anti-dumping actions, safeguard tariffs), customs, monitoring, and responses to “non-market excess capacity”.

2/7 trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/20…
2. PROPOSED GLOBAL ARRANGEMENT to “restore market-oriented conditions”

• Others can join
• In 2 years
• Bring into international forums
• Limit market access for non-market-oriented/carbon-intense exporters
• Discipline, coordinate own policies

3/7 trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/20…
Read 8 tweets
30 Oct
A lot going on this weekend: summits in Rome (G20) and Glasgow (climate change).

Also:

Exactly one month before the @wto Ministerial Conference #MC12 starts in Geneva. The prospects are improving marginally, but still not great.

ICYMI with updates

1/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/30/wto…
@BobWolfeSPS and I remain sceptical that the Ministerial Conference will deliver much of significance out of the broad range of critical problems confronting the @wto

2/7 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/10/30/wto…
More positive: a possible deal on curbing harmful fisheries subsidies—fingers firmly crossed

20 years talking past each other, 2020 deadline missed—until the UN Climate Change summit #COP26 and WTO Ministerial Conference #MC12 loomed

But no details

3/7 wto.org/english/news_e…
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct
Russia’s trade policy review—Day 1, Oct 27. Day 2: today.

These are periodic peer-review sessions (every 5 years for Russia), based on reports from the @wto Secretariat (factual) and the government being reviewed.

See wto.org/english/tratop…

1/15
From a Geneva trade official:

Comments Day 1: > 40 members + 1 observer (Serbia)

Briefly:
POSITIVE—Russia is constructive in @wto and for the coming Ministerial Conference
NEGATIVE—Import substitution policies, the role of the state in Russian economy

2/15
US: recognises steps taken in @wto, but concerns about turning inward, contrary to the principles—non-discrimination, predictability, transparency, fair competition, under import substitution and forced localization.

Includes investment, IT, SPS, government procurement

3/15
Read 14 tweets
28 Oct
Quite a long thread on the China’s public response to its @wto Trade Policy Review

Lots of detail including:
1. comments covered by WTO rules: China will take seriously and fulfill them,
2. comments beyond WTO rules: unfair, unreasonable, and unacceptable for China.

1/3
The comments came from WTO members. China responded in the meeting too.

Trade policy reviews are periodic peer-review sessions (every 3 years for China, US, EU and Japan). They are based on factual Secretariat reports.

2/3 @wto’s web page on the review: wto.org/english/tratop…
Here are two threads from @fbermingham on some of the comments members made and China’s response, inside the @wto trade policy review of China, on days 1 and 2.

Minutes will be published in a few months.

3/3
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct
ANNUAL REPORT: The @wto #Services Council (=full membership overseeing work under the General Agreement on Trade in Services, GATS)

It's 10 pages so just a highlight

#TradeInServices

1/4 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
Electronic commerce and services:

This now covers 3 areas

1. The moratorium on tax on cross-border electronic commerce (a topic as old as the WTO itself)

2. “Invigorated” discussion on boosting digital capability, from this paper: docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…

2/4
3. The on-going friction over negotiations in a sub-group of only part of the membership (“#plurilateral” talks, officially “joint-statement initiatives”, JSIs, seen as a way to progress when the membership is deadlocked) versus objections.

“A couple” = India and SAfrica

3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(