5/ 这个几个明显的好处:
a. 资金效率提升。ETH-A (68.9%的LTV),到aave借DAI (LTV 82.5%)
b. 抵押物收益。aave和dForce类似,都是池子模式,抵押物都有利息的,而Maker的vault没利息(hello MIM)
c. 渠道扩张。借aave这商行,到处攻城略地,还可领补贴,摆脱对一级铸币商的依赖
6/
d. 干掉铸币商。之前DAI铸币都是专业铸币商或大户。Vault铸DAI, 存入借贷协议,再循环一把,稳稳赚息差。铸币权下放,散户和aave吃了铸币商的利润。整体来说,对DAI的普及使用是非常好的。
对借款人来说,DAI成为固定利息贷款来源, 有助巩固作为大户长期杠杆的优势地位(借它一万年)
7/ e. 收入端。Maker收入变成铸币和二级存款收入,二级存款有aave抽成,比铸币稍差,但体量大起来,完全可弥补
好处说完,说说风险:
a) aave的风险都会传导到Maker, 假设xSushi的抵押物问题真被利用,aave 掏光,还可以继续掏Maker, 所以必须加铸币额度限制的,否则真是被一干就到底了
8/ b) Maker资产风险组合发生重大变化。ETH-A 等低效率低风险债仓会被迁移到aave,Maker整体抵押倍数下降(安全系数下降),但我觉得Maker本身的风险指标过于保守,控制好aave的整体敞口问题不大。
d) DAI二级垄断,aave成为DAI二级垄断平台,不利其它协议接入和推广,这是严重问题。
9/ 稳定币,其实是条条路通罗马,眼花缭乱的花拳绣腿,只不过是在描述不一样的起点。
最终都是为了抢市场,其它都是噱头。
老狗,不是不fashion, 是怕闪到腰,要真花拳绣腿起来,分分钟比谁都妖,这不,出招了。
end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ dForce’s revenue from USX perpetual trading already outpaced those from lending & stablecoin.
Dropped a medium and here would thread through the powerful combo of USX + perpetual trading, the 1st decentralized stableocin tapping into the market. medium.com/dforcenet/how-…
2/ For starters, those not familiar with dForce, USX is the first pool-based, decentralized, over-collateralized USD stablecoin built on top of dForce’s lending pool and other designated pools (permissioned pools, liquid staking assets, real-world-assets etc).
3/ Unlike Maker, which is CDP or single-vault-based, USX is a pool-based, USX has several improvements over Maker’s model: 1) high cap efficiency (collaterals are yield-carrying); 2) multi-collateral & cross-margin; 3) fully compatible to CDP model (spring up CDP-like vaults).
1/ DeFi layering is a better analytical framework for DeFi protocol v.s the fancy x.0 gimmick.
DeFi Layer 1 features protocols with strongest liquidity stickiness, ability to penetrate vertically and horizontally, these are asset layers (stablecoin, pegged-asset, yield-tokens)
2/ layer2 are functional protocols (lending, dex, swap) and layer 3, applications (aggregators, AMM optimizers, investment DAO etc).
DeFi L1 has the benefit of NOT segregating its liquidity while expanding across chains/layers, easy to launch into functional protocols
3/ Most value will sink into DeFi L1, very likely, a DeFi L1 can be sprang up into its own SC layer 1.
SC platforms command huge premium by extracting monetary velocity from dapp built upon it, DeFi L1 also has the advantage of extracting such velocity from DeFi L2/L3 protocols