5/ But with ~9 months of data, we sought to examine variation in drug prices at top-performing hospitals, focusing on 10 highly utilized drugs at 20 top hospitals.
Our focus was on the rates negotiated with commercial insurers.
6/ An important aside about methodology: #Medicare sets reimbursement rate at the average sales price (#ASP) + 6% (or 4.3% during budget sequestration). We compared the payer-specific price of each drug relative to the #Medicare reimbursement rate.
8/ Take #infliximab, a drug used to treat #Crohn disease and other auto-immune conditions.
The median negotiated rate at several hospitals was > 400% the Medicare reimbursement rate.
At @MayoClinic in Arizona, the median was 860% the Medicare reimbursement rate.
9/ Even at the same hospital, different commercial insurers paid vastly different prices.
At @umichmedicine, some commercial insurers paid as low as 102% of the Medicare reimbursement rate for infliximab; others paid as high as 880%.
10/ This pattern was observed across drugs and hospitals. For the 10 drugs in our sample, the median negotiated rates with commercial insurers ranged from 169% of the Medicare reimbursement rate @RushMedical to 344% at @MayoClinic in Arizona.
11/ We also examined self-pay cash prices. These are the prices charged to the uninsured (or those who otherwise pay without insurance).
13/ Top-performing #hospitals routinely charge commercial insurers prices for #prescription#drugs far in excess of the acquisition costs for these drugs. And they may earn considerable revenue in the process.
14/ The potential revenue is particularly sizeable once we consider that more than three-quarters of hospitals in our sample were #340B entities.
15/ #340B hospitals serve vulnerable patient populations and are entitled to acquire drugs from manufacturers at steep discounts.
These hospitals can earn high sums from markups on commercial insurers.
20/ @sunitamd & @JMichaelMcW found that #340B participation was associated with more hematologists-oncologists and ophthalmologists than would otherwise be expected. (These specialties often use expensive clinician-administered drugs).
21/ Our work should also be understood within the broader context of #hospital pricing for many goods and services. See, e.g., the phenomenal reporting by @sarahkliff@jshkatz@iamrumz@UpshotNYT.
22/ There are several limitations to our study. First, we do not know the payer mix at hospitals. Payers who negotiate the lowest rates may have the highest volume of patients at that hospital. We focus on median reported price, not the median prices that hospitals receive.
23/ Second, we only examined a small sample of top-performing hospitals. Within this sample, only 55% reported payer-specific drug prices.
24/ We did attempt to contact all hospitals that failed to post the relevant data. We received some interesting responses.
25/ @StanfordMed and @UCSFHospitals posted files that contained thousands of rows with cells that just said “variable” and no actual prices for drugs.
Official response: negotiated contracts did not have fixed prices and so could not be provided.
26/ Some hospitals said that they were in compliance even though they had only posted negotiated prices for a small number of goods and services.
27/ We are hopeful that our study may shine further light on the need for better enforcement of the transparency rule.
The Biden administration has outlined new plans to address non-compliance. @annawmathews@_melaevans
There are 2 broad categories of discounts in Medicare #PartD: direct and indirect remuneration (#DIR) and coverage gap discounts (#CGD).
2/ #DIR includes confidential rebates that drug manufacturers pay to #PartD plans and #PBMs, often to secure favorable formulary placement. #DIR also includes discounts paid by pharmacies to plans and #PBMs—e.g., to be in the plan’s preferred network.