Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench to continue hearing a petition filed by Zakia Jafri, widow of slain Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, challenging the Special Investigation Team’s (SIT) clean chit to then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 Godhra riots #supremecourt
Sibal: Article 21 has an aspect where a person can be deprived of life and liberty in accordance with procedure established by law. What CRPC does is to establish that procedure #zakiajafri#supremecourt#gujaratriots
Sibal reading out Section 157 CrPC on procedure for preliminary enquiry.
Without a pure unbiased investigation, the procedure established by law would be violated: Sibal
Sibal recounting his experiences during 1984 riots.
"I was living at Maharani Bagh. And houses of two Sikh gentlemen there were already identified by the mob. They came only for those houses," says Sibal.
Sibal reading out more instances of violence and lack of action by authorities.
"I can't go on and on. No investigation into it at all. The SIT has ignored all of this, Magistrate has ignored all of this, High Court has ignored all of this," Sibal.
"I am repeating it, I am not concerned with individuals. I am concerned with the process. I am only saying SIT did not do its job. It was an act of protection. It did a collaborative exercise," Sibal.
Is it his job to handle dead bodies. If he was so concerned would he have allowed the bodies to be brought by road from Godhra to Ahmedabad and allowed passions to flare up: Sibal
PC Pandey was one of the worst collaborators. He later became DGP of Gujarat. The journey from accused to DGP is disconcerting: Sibal
Statement of Zameer Uddin Shah, the Lieutenant General who led Army to tackle riots and who said Army was stuck at (Ahmedabad) airport for one day, was never recorded: Sibal
Why did this whole concept of protest petition come about. Under law only State is empowered to prosecute. State's role is to stand for victim and secure justice: Sibal
Sibal: it is the duty of the investigating agency to see that the channel and stream of evidence is pure. if that does not happen then there is no reason for having a SIT. This is happening in many cases and all over
Sibal: just 5 days after the appointment of SIT constituted by supreme court one batch of evidence was destroyed. If the destruction was in routine manner why did PC Pandey keep a record and then produce it later?
If the investigating agency does not do its duty, the victim suffers doubly - at the hands of the accused and then at the hands of investigation agency which did not do its duty: Sibal
in matters of riots, high courts have been saying that newspaper reports should be looked at since it is contemporaneous evidence. journalist statements should be recorded but none of this was done. : Sibal
SIT deliberately chose to leave phone call records unauthenticated. Police officials had to be summoned to verify the CD and even that was not done: Sibal
Sibal: There were panic messages by police official stationed at sola civil hospital and explosive interviews were given by kar sevaks saying violence will be unleashed on Muslims.. so all this was known to the police but no action was taken
Sibal: members of RSS already gathered at sola civil hospital, if jaideep patel says he did not know and everything was peaceful then how 3,000 people reached there... they were not family members of deceased but all #RSS people
Sibal: this was all building up to the riots that was going to take place. there is a chilling account of how 8 persons were burnt alive. according to investigation many of the news items were false but printed only to inflame passions
Justice Kahnwilkar: Inaction during crime and inaction during the investigation is different which you will also appreciate. How is this relevant? that's why SIT was created by SC.
Justice Khanwilkar: inaction during the investigation is not relevant for larger conspiracy, inaction during the crime helps in establishing the larger conspiracy
Sibal: There is a manual as to how officers should perform during communal riots. question is why was it not followed. question is why wad the mob allowed to run a muck
Sibal: information qua larger conspiracy is only an information but its obligatory for state to take note of all cognizable offences. law is clear if the complaint is of larger conspiracy in the course of probing that, what was found was serious offences #ZakiaJafri#SupremeCourt
Sibal: i will show you statements of RSS and VHP fellows that public prosecutors were acting at their behest.
Sibal: if today ti was the case then UAPA would have been invoked. the protest petition deals with all aspects and shows how police officers acted, not taking preventive measures, public officers collaborating, not reaching offence sports, destroying evidence
Sibal: in light of what was presented before the magistrate, he could have taken cognizance as there were instances of extra judicial confessions too and that is a very portent piece of evidence as per an earlier judgment.
Sibal: the SIT without examination had accepted the statement of Mr Haresh Bhat. the SIT didi not investigate the matter of arms and ammunitions being manufactured and in usual course arrests would have been done to probe.
Sibal: see the reasoning by the magistrate court to disregard the extra judicial confessions by Anil patel. it is a settled position that extra judicial confession when voluntary can be used to convict the accused
Sibal reads statements to show how bombs were manufactured and supplied to "Hindu areas": they say bombs are used to blast dynamites so it will work in this case too. what was SIT doing? there was no investigation but only an effort to protect
Sibal: SIT only worked to protect the VHP, Bajrang Dal , RSS members and protect people worthy of names #ZakiaJafri#SupremeCourt
Sibal: our contention is that SIT did not even maintain a case diary. they never took the statement of NHRC, no statement from citizens tribunal and all of them indicted. #ZakiaJafri#SupremeCourt
Sibal: all the swords recovered very brand new and bore the same manufacturing mark of Sirohi, Rajasthan. VHP members had said that distribution of swords took place for almost a month. #ZakiaJafri#SupremeCourt
Sibal: VHF joint secretary Jaideep Patel denies any distribution of swords "in the last few days", but
admits that swords and trishuls are routinely distributed to volunteers.
Sibal: "We've been distributing these weapons since 1985; trishul diksha samarohs and Bharatiya abhyans are a constant process," he said. "Nobody has objected, not even the police." said Patel #zakiajafri#supremecourt
Sibal: Police officers have a different view of the tempered, well-sharpened steel. Holding up one
confiscated sword, a police officer said, "Look, most of them are more than four feet long. They
slice through flesh on touch. Just touch the edge to a man's throat and dead"
Sibal: Requesting anonymity, an officer said there was no doubt the distribution was well-organised. "Some of the men arrested during seizures said that during the trishul diksha samaroh last November, swords were given to any volunteer who paid Rs 200," he said.
Sibal: after the sing operation what was the SIT doing? we have given statements made on the sting and the statements taken by SIT. One is Anil Patel, then is Babu Bajrangi, Bharat bhat, deepak shah and dhaval patel, hemant bhat, dilip trivedi, prahlad raju, madan, mangilal jain
Sibal: then there was suresh richard, rajendr vyas and ramesh dave. these are the people who has statements made in sting. CBI had made a detailed submission authenticating the sting.
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench indicates that it is going to hold the Army guilty for contempt for not granting permanent commission to women officers as per its earlier judgment
SC notes that Out of 72 officers, 1 had applied for premature release. Out of remaining 71 officers, 39 have been granted PC and a letter has been issued on 29 October 2021 in compliance of our Verdict
Adv Sudhanshu Choudhari: The invigilators have accepted on affidavit that they distributed wrong answer booklets and how they state that it was their first time as invigilators. Such wrong answer booklets were distributed to 6 students
Wankhede’s father has filed a 20 page affidavit listing out 28 documents which prove that his name is indeed ‘Dnyandeo’ and not ‘Dawood’ as is being stated by ‘Malik’.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by ex-fortis promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh against Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) timeline stating that it would need four more months to complete the probe in the fund embezzlement case
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Delhi Police says a reply has been filed yesterday in the case
Earlier SG had opposed the matter being taken up as a fresh plea in High Court again and said he wanted to dispel the wrong impression created by the accused and referred to the enormity of the scam saying the amount involved is over ₹ 1,500 crore.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea seeking a direction to the CBI to register an FIR and probe the alleged duty evasion by 61 iron exporting firms including Essar Steel and Jindal Steel & Power in exporting iron ore to China since 2015
CJI: Mr ML Sharma, you read something in newspapers, twitter and then file petitions, we cannot have hearings like this. Next time if you threaten my officers I will not leave you. you are threatening the registrars. whatever we say they follow..
CJI: If you shout them and talk like this...
Sharma: this is not my nature..
CJI to Centre: where is your counter affidavit?
Centre: we filed it late last night
Justice Kohli: what is the use then? what time did you file?
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by Future Retail seeking to hold meeting of creditors and shareholders for seeking approval to the Reliance deal while Amazon seeks to stall it in view of latest Singapore arbitration award @amazon#Future@reliancegroup
Justice Hima Kohli: My family and even me hold shares in Reliance, if someone has issues please say it now