Supreme Court is hearing the plea by Centre challenging the order of HC allowing an examination of two NEET students who had answer sheets mixed up

SG:16 lacs students appear, there may be some error somewhere but that cannot be the cause of having re-examinations

#supremecourt
Adv Sudhanshu Choudhari: The invigilators have accepted on affidavit that they distributed wrong answer booklets and how they state that it was their first time as invigilators. Such wrong answer booklets were distributed to 6 students

#NEET #SupremeCOURT
SG Tushar Mehta: we will match the answers with the correct question booklets

(This is the case where the top court had paved the way for declaration of NEET UG 2021 results)
Choudhari: Instead of approaching this court, reexaminations could have been conducted for these two students. answer sheet of all students are published on website except these two students.
SG: Every paper is different and the chronological order is different thus with every paper is an answer sheet. So here what we have done is : the answer key will be implemented as per sequence of question given as per test booklet
SC ORDER: The two students have filed writ petitions before the Bombay HC seeking a direction to the petitioner to re-examine them by conducting a separate NEET exam before declaring results for admission to UG medical courses
SC ORDER: At the time of distribution of question papers and answer booklets, there was a mix-up and different booklets and answer sheets which did not match the code were given to the two students
SC ORDER: As per instruction to students, the two students reported the mix up to the invigilators. The invigilators did not rectify the mistake pointed out by respondent 1 and 2 and with short time left the students completed the paper
SC ORDER: Respondent 2 filed a plea before the High Court. a suggestion was made on behalf of central govt that the answer key shall be implemented for evaluating the 6 candidates in whose case there was a mix up as per sequence of Q in test booklets
SC ORDER: On October 20, the High Court disposed off the writ petition directing the petitioner to hold a fresh exam for the two students and declare the results within 2 weeks.
SC ORDER: Aggrieved the Centre has filed this SLP, on October 28 this court stayed the impugned judgment of the HC. On that day, we requested the SG suggest the course of action to be adopted in respect of the two students
SC ORDER: We are informed that results of NEET UG has been announced. The SG submitted that the answer sheets of the two students have been corrected on the basis of the suggestion that was given by the petitioner to the High Court.
SC ORDER: Without insisting on test booklet code being different, the answers given by the petitioner have been corrected. He submitted that fresh exam will be conducted for the two students as directed by the HC. There is already another candidate who has approached HC
SC ORDER: Mr Choudari refers to HC order to submit that undisputedly there is gross error committed by the invigilator and distribution of paper booklet and the answersheet.
SC ORDER: After having accepted the mistake committed, it is submitted that 2 students have excellent academic record and they cannot be made to suffer and that thy answered the remaining questions under stress.
SC ORDER: There is no dispute that there was a mix up in distribution of the answer sheets and the test booklet where the code was different.
SC ORDER: realising that wrong answer will attract negative marks the 2 students pointed it out to the invigilators that correct answer sheets with proper code has to be given to them.
SC ORDER: We have perused the results of the two students on the material produced by the SG on October 28. They have attempted most of the questions. no negative marks have been given to them.
SC ORDER: However we find substance in submission of Mr Choudhari that with loss of precious time the two students could not answer all the questions and we also appreciate the state of mind of the 2 students.
Though we sympathise with the cause of the two students. we find it difficult to order the reexamination of the two students. Thus we set aside the direction of the HC to conduct fresh exam for the two students: SC ORDER

#SupremeCOURT #NEETretest
SC ORDER: We feel sorry, but we cannot do anything.
#SupremeCOURT #NEETretest

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

13 Nov
#SupremeCourt to hear plea highlighting the “inaction” of Supervisory committee appointed by the court to take care of material and safety aspects of Mulla Periyar Dam #MullaiperiyarDam
In view of a recent spell of heavy downpour in Kerala and the threat of floods looming large, the Supreme Court had in the last hearing issued an interim order saying the water level in the dam can be up to 139.05 feet.
Tamil Nadu govt has informed the #SupremeCourt that Mullaperiyar dam situated in Kerala's Periyar river and which supplies water to five districts of Tamil Nadu, is structurally, hydrologically and seismically safe

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 14 tweets
13 Nov
Supreme Court special bench headed by CJI NV Ramana to shortly hear a plea regarding pendency of criminal cases against MPs & MLAs and expeditious disposal of the same by setting up of Special Courts
#SupremeCourt #MPs #MLAs @AshwiniUpadhyay
CJI: We listed this case since there has been issue of transferring some judges in some states who may be hearing such cases

Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: I had argued that in UP a magistrate court is not hearing such cases and it is being heard by sessions court.

CJI: This is sad
CJI: When we heard this case a few years back no one raised an objection but now when the case is over people are coming with issues

Judges discuss among themselves
Read 9 tweets
13 Nov
Supreme Court special bench headed by CJI NV Ramana to hear a plea by 17-year-old Delhi student Aditya Dubey concerning rising levels of air pollution in Delhi
#SupremeCourt #AirPollution
The top court had earlier directed the centre to take steps and Delhi government to file an affidavit in this regard.

Hearing to commence at 10.30 am today

#SupremeCourt #AirPollution @ArvindKejriwal @CPCB_OFFICIAL
Read 41 tweets
12 Nov
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench indicates that it is going to hold the Army guilty for contempt for not granting permanent commission to women officers as per its earlier judgment

Army informs #SupremeCourt just then it was ready to grant #permanentcommission to 11 officers
Hearing to resume at 2 PM
#SupremeCourt #permanentcommission
SC notes that Out of 72 officers, 1 had applied for premature release. Out of remaining 71 officers, 39 have been granted PC and a letter has been issued on 29 October 2021 in compliance of our Verdict
Read 25 tweets
12 Nov
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the defamation suit filed by father #SameerWankhede against NCP leader #NawabMalik.

@nawabmalikncp
@narcoticsbureau
Malik filed his short affidavit clarifying his stance that he has verified the documents before uploading the same.

#SameerWankhede #NawabMalik #BombayHighCourt
Wankhede’s father has filed a 20 page affidavit listing out 28 documents which prove that his name is indeed ‘Dnyandeo’ and not ‘Dawood’ as is being stated by ‘Malik’.

#SameerWankhede #NawabMalik #BombayHighCourt
Read 109 tweets
11 Nov
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by ex-fortis promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh against Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) timeline stating that it would need four more months to complete the probe in the fund embezzlement case
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Delhi Police says a reply has been filed yesterday in the case
Earlier SG had opposed the matter being taken up as a fresh plea in High Court again and said he wanted to dispel the wrong impression created by the accused and referred to the enormity of the scam saying the amount involved is over ₹ 1,500 crore.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(