Share this page!

Emma Reilly Profile picture
Twitter logo
11 Nov, 5 tweets, 3 min read
2006: @UN starts handing names to China.
2007: UN continues
2008: UN continues
2009: UN continues
2010: UN continues
2011: UN continues
2012: UN continues
2013: I find out and report it. UN continues
2014: I continue to report. UN continues to give names...
2015: I continue to report. UN continues to give names.
2016: I continue to report. I'm refused #whistleblower status explicitly because UN continues to give names.
2017: i continue to report. UN admits it continues to give names in a press release.
2018: I continue to report. UN starts publicly saying it never handed over any names and, if shown proof, that it stopped in 2015. I'm refused #whistleblower status because UN says it continues to give names.
2019: UN says in court, under oath, that it gives names...
2020: I'm given #whistleblower status, because the Ethics Officer believes it stopped. @antonioguterres illegally withdraws status because UN court position is still that it gives names. China still knows who is coming and targets them (@yangjianli001 turned away at door)...
2021: UN again claims it stopped.
So, will you recognise my #whistleblower rights and reinstate me, @antonioguterres?

telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Emma Reilly

Emma Reilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmmaReillyTweet

Emma Reilly Profile picture
3 Aug
A timeline of @UN complicity in genocide:
2006: @UNHumanRights starts secretly giving #Beijing names of dissidents who plan to attend @UN meetings. Everyone keeps the secret.
2007: Everyone keeps the secret
2008: "
2009: "
2010: "
2011: "
2012: "
2013: I find out and report it. Nobody internally cares, so I report to @EU_Commission. @UNHumanRights lies so @EU_UNGeneva does nothing.
2014: I report.
2015: I report.
2016: @IrelandUNGeneva use my name and evidence to counter @UN lies. They briefly think it stops.
2017: @UNHumanRights puts out a press release admitting it is still policy to give names to #Beijing, but lying about me. I am later awarded compensation for lies. Later that year, after criticism, @UN lies that no such policy ever existed.
Read 6 tweets
Emma Reilly Profile picture
1 Feb
Today marks eight years since I found out about and reported @UNHumanRights secretly handing names of #Uyghur, #Tibetan and other activists to China. @UN has lied to governments, to the press, to the activists themselves. @antonioguterres investigate and stop complicity. /1
Some @UN stories:
2013-2017: never happened, to @EU_UNGeneva and all govts who asked.
2017: ongoing, in a press release
2018: happened, but @UN was only complicit in international crimes for a full DECADE (2006-2015), so move along.
2019: ongoing, in sworn court testimony. /2
If I had invented such an egregious policy, firing me would be easy. @UN is now investigating me FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. I was not "authorised" to do that, but @UN_Spokesperson was "authorised" to lie. An 8-year cover up implicates all of senior management. /3
Read 4 tweets
Emma Reilly Profile picture
12 Jan
The @UN is investigating and planning to fire me for blowing the whistle to national govts on @UN giving names of their nationals to China, so China could target their families. @UN has *never* investigated those responsible or stopped handing over names. /1
So, @EU_UNGeneva @UKMissionGeneva @IrelandUNGeneva @GermanyUNGeneva @usmissiongeneva @NLinGeneva @SwedenGeneva @NorwayInGeneva @swiss_un @CanadaUN, you said my reports were essential. Time to demand independent investigation of the policy, and protection of the whistleblower. /2
The person who ordered the investigation (@UN's head of management) is *supposed* to be under investigation for retaliating against me. @antonioguterres, why did you refuse your own Ethics Office saying the investigation into the retaliators should be referred externally? /3 of 3
Read 4 tweets
Emma Reilly Profile picture
28 Oct 20
.@UNHumanRights still claims a right to lie. So, here's the truth @hrw @AmnestyEU @UNWatch @ISHRglobal, @WIN. This is a quote from the final Ethics findings: "the management was naturally and perhaps primarily interested in good relations with the member state (China);" /1
the Complainant (me) was interested in human rights and protection of human rights activists. OHCHR was, by virtue of the Complainant’s whistleblowing, placed in a very awkward diplomatic position by a human rights issue that it struggled to handle well... /2
A whistleblower’s reporting of such a practice, which was contrary to fundamental UN principles and values, is exactly the sort of activity that must be protected; it is far more important than minor infractions of bureaucratic rules." I couldn't agree more. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @EmmaReillyTweet has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @EmmaReillyTweet!

Read all threads by @EmmaReillyTweet

:(