Supreme Court special bench headed by CJI NV Ramana to shortly hear a plea regarding pendency of criminal cases against MPs & MLAs and expeditious disposal of the same by setting up of Special Courts #SupremeCourt#MPs#MLAs@AshwiniUpadhyay
CJI: We listed this case since there has been issue of transferring some judges in some states who may be hearing such cases
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: I had argued that in UP a magistrate court is not hearing such cases and it is being heard by sessions court.
CJI: This is sad
CJI: When we heard this case a few years back no one raised an objection but now when the case is over people are coming with issues
Judges discuss among themselves
Adv Sneha Kalita: Mr Vijay Hansaria is travelling and he is not aware of this.
CJI: He is the amicus in this case and he is aware about the jurisdiction issues. Madras HC has taken a view. WHen can he assist us? Mr Sibal when is your case listed?
Kalita: Mr Hansaria will be back by Sunday
Sibal: Please have this case on Monday
CJI: Mr Mehta...
SG: Mr Hansaria says he has filed a note on this legal question..
Kalita: it relies on 14th report
CJI: It is about the jurisdiction of the special courts. circulate the note to Mr Sibal
CJI: We will list this case on Moday. we don't know if we will be able to conclude but at least we will hear it.
Sr Adv Sibal: please protect all of us in pollution matter. We cannot stand an AQI of 580. children, elderly and advocates are exposed Its a life threatening isssue
SG: we are also a victim of this
Sibal: for once the SG is on my side...
Justice Chandrachud laughs..
CJI to Sr Adv Nidhesh Gupta: you want cases to be heard by some judicial officers in the IA.. What does that mean..
Gupta: Full court meeting is on Wednesday.. not appropriate to mention the names before that
CJI: allow all the IAs... we will hear this case on Monday
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to hear plea highlighting the “inaction” of Supervisory committee appointed by the court to take care of material and safety aspects of Mulla Periyar Dam #MullaiperiyarDam
In view of a recent spell of heavy downpour in Kerala and the threat of floods looming large, the Supreme Court had in the last hearing issued an interim order saying the water level in the dam can be up to 139.05 feet.
Tamil Nadu govt has informed the #SupremeCourt that Mullaperiyar dam situated in Kerala's Periyar river and which supplies water to five districts of Tamil Nadu, is structurally, hydrologically and seismically safe
Supreme Court special bench headed by CJI NV Ramana to hear a plea by 17-year-old Delhi student Aditya Dubey concerning rising levels of air pollution in Delhi #SupremeCourt#AirPollution
The top court had earlier directed the centre to take steps and Delhi government to file an affidavit in this regard.
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench indicates that it is going to hold the Army guilty for contempt for not granting permanent commission to women officers as per its earlier judgment
SC notes that Out of 72 officers, 1 had applied for premature release. Out of remaining 71 officers, 39 have been granted PC and a letter has been issued on 29 October 2021 in compliance of our Verdict
Adv Sudhanshu Choudhari: The invigilators have accepted on affidavit that they distributed wrong answer booklets and how they state that it was their first time as invigilators. Such wrong answer booklets were distributed to 6 students
Wankhede’s father has filed a 20 page affidavit listing out 28 documents which prove that his name is indeed ‘Dnyandeo’ and not ‘Dawood’ as is being stated by ‘Malik’.
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by ex-fortis promoter Shivinder Mohan Singh against Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) timeline stating that it would need four more months to complete the probe in the fund embezzlement case
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Delhi Police says a reply has been filed yesterday in the case
Earlier SG had opposed the matter being taken up as a fresh plea in High Court again and said he wanted to dispel the wrong impression created by the accused and referred to the enormity of the scam saying the amount involved is over ₹ 1,500 crore.