#SupremeCourt hears a plea filed by Alibaba Cloud (India) challenging the order passed by the Madhya Pradesh High court which had rejected interim relief for restoration of the operation of their bank account which was attached by a Sessions Court @AlibabaGroup
Sr Adv Gopal Subramanium: Please permit us to file a bond, we have companies everywhere
SC to respondent: the security is there. as on today there is 49 cores lying in the account, we can say that the money can remain in account. during probe if you come across something tell us
MP: please ask us them to cooperate
SC: Ofocurse that is as per law, but completely paralyzing it will lead to business not been conducted
Subramanium: there was no freezing order and bank said IO froze it. we are not named in FIR
SC: There is no freezing order?
Subramanium: we got the information from HSBC Bank.. it was stated that all debits frozen upon instructions from June 15, 2021
SC: So there is no freezing order?
Subramanium: No, that is the case
MP: please allow us to file a reply this is our first appearance. please allow us one week
SC: state requests for short adjournment to place reply affidavit on record. List on November 22, 2021 #supremecourt@AlibabaGroup
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court bench led by CJI NV Ramana to deliver it's order constituting a former judge manned commission to probe the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case #SupremeCourt#LakhimpurKheriviolence
The two judges in the fray to be appointed by the top court as observed last week are: 1. Former Judge Justice Rakesh Jain (Punjab and Haryana HC) 2. Former Judge Justice Ranjit Singh (Punjab and Haryana HC)
However suggestions were also made to appoint a former Supreme Court judge.
Union of India has informed #SupremeCourt that rather than implementing work from home as suggested by top court it would rather put in place vehicle pooling system to reduce vehicular pollution for govt officers
After the emergency meeting it was decided that truck entry will not be permitted in Delhi upto Nov 21,2021
#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear the petition filed by several persons to quash FIRs registered against them under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for social media posts alleging communal violence in Tripura @ShyamMeeraSingh
Tripura police had booked 102 social media users, including journalists and activists, under the UAPA and accused them of criminal conspiracy and forgery. Journalist @ShyamMeeraSingh and others had moved the top court through Advocate Prashant Bhushan @pbhushan1
Adv Bhushan: two advocates and one journalist are petitioners. they went to Tripura to do a fact finding report
CJI: They were arrested bail yersterday
Bhushan: it was two others in the case
CJI: Issue notice and no coercive action in meantime
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea filed by social activists Anun Dhawan, Ishann Dhawan and Kunjana Singh, seeking subsidised canteens in all states and UTs to ensure food security in the wake of the havoc wreaked by the pandemic #hunger
CJI: We had noted last time that state govt has to take responsibility to put up kitchens etc and until then centre cant do anything. we had asked for a meeting to be convened so that a comprehensive scheme can be drawn up and areas like jharkhand, bihar can be identified
CJI: So far the finances are concerned you can decided what finance state and centre will give and how much foodgrains centre. this is it and i am not going to law or other details. A common scheme has to be evolved.
CJI NV Ramana led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging the dismissal of an Andhra Pradesh High Court order which had rejected the plea of a Devotee to look into irregularities of "Pooja and Archana" within the sanctorum
CJI to Srivari Dadaa: Don't give us speeches. this is not a platform for us to hear you speeches. Address us properly
Party in person: I want instant relief that the Abhishekham process is followed as per traditions
Justice Hima Kohli: is his representation taken into account by respondents?
SC: What was the decision? It's your duty to clarify it. this does not mean you have a free pass
#SupremeCourt to hear the suit filed by the West Bengal Govt against the Centre under Article 131 of the Constitution. The State has challenged the CBI’s jurisdiction to register FIRs and conduct investigations in the State in myriad cases #CBI@MamataOfficial#DSPEAct
Union Government had told the Supreme Court that Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal does not have any “absolute” power to keep the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) from investigating crimes inside the State @MamataOfficial#CBI#consent
Attorney General for India, KK Venugopal refers to Page 19 of the suit