CJI NV Ramana led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging the dismissal of an Andhra Pradesh High Court order which had rejected the plea of a Devotee to look into irregularities of "Pooja and Archana" within the sanctorum
CJI to Srivari Dadaa: Don't give us speeches. this is not a platform for us to hear you speeches. Address us properly
Party in person: I want instant relief that the Abhishekham process is followed as per traditions
Justice Hima Kohli: is his representation taken into account by respondents?
SC: What was the decision? It's your duty to clarify it. this does not mean you have a free pass
Respondent: each and every grievance of petitioner is taken into account
SC: But it's all internal how does he know it
Respondent: it's part of the counter affidavit.
CJI: something is wrong you have to give a detailed reply saying rituals are as per traditions
CJI: Or else you will force us to order. (Now to petitioner) Mr Dadaa we have seen it the petition has to be dismissed. We cannot interfere in day to day administration of how to conduct Pooja etc.
CJI: Don't make this into a publicity interest litigation.
SC: these issues cannot be decided in a writ petition.
Dadaa: it's a public temple
CJI: how will courts interfere in this and how to conduct rituals?
CJI: The relief sought by the petitioner is in the nature of interfering in day to day affairs of temple. This cannot be looked into by a constitutional court. Any deviation from tradition is a question of fact which trial court can look into by appreciating the evidence.
CJI: This court cannot entertain this under a writ. Apart from Pooja if the administration is ignoring rules and regulations or indulging any other violation of arrangements,
CJI: those are only areas where we can ask Devasthan to clarify the issues raised by the petitioner or any other devotee. Other than this if we start interfering in sevas then it will not be feasible.
CJI: The administration is directed to give a proper answer to the petitioner and if there is still a grievance then an appropriate forum may be approached. Answer to be given within 8 weeks..with above observations we dispose off the plea.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court bench led by CJI NV Ramana to deliver it's order constituting a former judge manned commission to probe the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case #SupremeCourt#LakhimpurKheriviolence
The two judges in the fray to be appointed by the top court as observed last week are: 1. Former Judge Justice Rakesh Jain (Punjab and Haryana HC) 2. Former Judge Justice Ranjit Singh (Punjab and Haryana HC)
However suggestions were also made to appoint a former Supreme Court judge.
Union of India has informed #SupremeCourt that rather than implementing work from home as suggested by top court it would rather put in place vehicle pooling system to reduce vehicular pollution for govt officers
After the emergency meeting it was decided that truck entry will not be permitted in Delhi upto Nov 21,2021
#SupremeCourt bench led by CJI NV Ramana to hear the petition filed by several persons to quash FIRs registered against them under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) for social media posts alleging communal violence in Tripura @ShyamMeeraSingh
Tripura police had booked 102 social media users, including journalists and activists, under the UAPA and accused them of criminal conspiracy and forgery. Journalist @ShyamMeeraSingh and others had moved the top court through Advocate Prashant Bhushan @pbhushan1
Adv Bhushan: two advocates and one journalist are petitioners. they went to Tripura to do a fact finding report
CJI: They were arrested bail yersterday
Bhushan: it was two others in the case
CJI: Issue notice and no coercive action in meantime
#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea filed by social activists Anun Dhawan, Ishann Dhawan and Kunjana Singh, seeking subsidised canteens in all states and UTs to ensure food security in the wake of the havoc wreaked by the pandemic #hunger
CJI: We had noted last time that state govt has to take responsibility to put up kitchens etc and until then centre cant do anything. we had asked for a meeting to be convened so that a comprehensive scheme can be drawn up and areas like jharkhand, bihar can be identified
CJI: So far the finances are concerned you can decided what finance state and centre will give and how much foodgrains centre. this is it and i am not going to law or other details. A common scheme has to be evolved.
#SupremeCourt to hear the suit filed by the West Bengal Govt against the Centre under Article 131 of the Constitution. The State has challenged the CBI’s jurisdiction to register FIRs and conduct investigations in the State in myriad cases #CBI@MamataOfficial#DSPEAct
Union Government had told the Supreme Court that Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal does not have any “absolute” power to keep the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) from investigating crimes inside the State @MamataOfficial#CBI#consent
Attorney General for India, KK Venugopal refers to Page 19 of the suit
#SupremeCourt to resume hearing plea filed by Zakia Jafri, widow of slain Congress Member of Parliament Ehsan Jafri, challenging the Special Investigation Team’s (SIT) clean chit to then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 Godhra riots #gujaratriots@narendramodi
Hearing commences. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal making arguments.