The presence of long lived memory B cells had previously been established in several papers, see my tweets. This paper focuses on memory T cells in response to 2 doses of mRNA vaccine.
I will discuss some basic immunology first, to help understand the context of this paper.
2/
Following the innate response, the adaptive immulogical response to a virus infection is basically two pronged.
The two arms are T cells and B cells.
B cells make antibodies which work like security guards OUTSIDE our gate, preventing the thief from entering the premises.
3/
However once the thief enters the premises (metaphor for entry into cell), we absolutely need the T cells to detect and destroy the infected cells. (As antibodies can’t enter cells).
This is the chief method of stopping FURTHER spread in the body, and to limit organ damage.
4/
T cells come in different genres. Effector T cells are the policemen that search & destroy infected cells. These are active after vaccination or after natural infection. This is the reason why people who are vaccinated or had past natural infection survive the next infection.
5/
Memory T cells belong to 3 types: central memory (also called T stem cell memory cells), effector memory cells and tissue resident memory cells (TRM). These three types have different roles.
These are the cells that remain long term after “immune contraction”.
6/
“Immune contraction” is the natural down-shifting of our immune response AFTER we get rid of the initial infection or vaccine.
This is because there is no need for a continuous active immune response AFTER the enemy has been defeated.
However a “memory file” is essential.
7/
As part of this “immune contraction”, total antibody levels will fall to a low baseline - after about 3 months, when plasmablasts disappear.
This however has been widely mis-interpreted as “waning” and “failure of immune response”.
8/
The high circulating antibody levels during these initial few months naturally reduce the chance of another infection by the same virus.
This can be compared to a temporary “immediate shield” as the authors state in the paper. As they decline, breakthrough infections occur.
9/
The reason why the body should not continuously be in “immunological overdrive” (that is, persistently high antibody levels and immune cells patrolling) is because it can generate its own complications, such as chronic autoimmune disease.
10/
The authors monitored the T-cell memory cells among 71 individuals who received two doses of Pfizer vaccine.
They found long-lasting CD4+ and CD8+ T-SCM, (T-stem cell memory) which were stable throughout the 6-month period of this study.
This is good news.
11/
TSCM cells provide a memory reservoir with multipotent capacity, and have been shown to persist for decades.
The authors write:
“The detection of TSCM in vaccinated individuals is thus suggestive of the establishment of long-lived immunity”.
12/
“The number of TSCM induced after priming predicted future T cell responses, and the stability of this memory population may point in the direction of durable immunity against SARS-CoV2”
13/
In summary, this proves that 2 doses of (mRNA) vaccine generate not only long lived B cell memory, but also long lived T-cell memory response with poly-functionality; providing the ability to prevent organ damage if & when subsequent infections of SARS-CoV2 virus occur.
14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The most powerful graph that I have seen of the pandemic.
This calls for a rethink of vaccination strategy.
Note the sharp demarcation around age 40-45.
Vaccination of this 40+ segment needs priority.
Below that age, it could even be made optional. Here’s why👇
(Thread)
Although vaccines were launched with a hope of stopping transmission and further waves, we have seen that high % vaccination coverage does not stop subsequent waves. This is because they are ineffective in providing mucosal immunity; virus is silently spreading in communities.
2/
At the same time, we have found that vaccines are not 100% benign products as is often suggested by certain academics.
They have failed to acknowledge the small but significant number of serious and fatal outcomes is that occurred - particularly among younger individuals.
3/
The study looked at vaccinated and and vaccinated people in Sweden and looked at the event rates up to 9 months.
They calculated vaccine effectiveness at regular intervals until past six months. The authors conclude erroneously that vaccine effectiveness drops to (zero).
2/
The traditional method of calculating effectiveness is to compare the outcomes in the vaccinated & vaccinated groups and see the percentage difference between the two.
Eg. If 10 events happen in the unvax group and only 1 event occurs in the vax group, effectiveness is 90%.
3/
First detailed description of immune response following breakthrough infections. This is a study on a subset of 35 people (infected vs uninfected) from the Provincetown Massachusetts outbreak, US.
At the same time, vaccinated individuals are less likely to be admitted to hospital, or die from COVID-19.
The reported death protection is likely to be an underestimation, because vaccination preferentially occurs among people who have more background illnesses.
2/
The question is why the rate of infection is higher among vaccinated people.
It is obvious by now that vaccines aren’t very good at stopping the virus from entering the nose or throat, particularly past the initial few weeks of high antibody titres.
3/