"Prior to his involvement with Drastic, Bostickson told us that he had spent nearly a decade empowering ‘activists living under repressive regimes through collaborative sharing of electronic and audio-visual materials’" (Rage University)
"had its beginnings on Twitter, one of the few places that did not censor discussion of the virus origin throughout the first year and a half of the pandemic"
"Facebook flagged as ‘false information’ much of the work of these sleuths, even when it proved to be true information, while Reddit simply deleted it."
Thank you to Billy Bostickson who remains anonymous for security reasons, for your dedication to this topic. Your detailed knowledge around every aspect of the origins of the virus is arguably unparalleled
1. Transfer of Biological Samples from a BSL 3 Facility
A stern warning from Xavier Abad Morejón de Girón, Biosafety level 3 Laboratory Manager at CReSA – Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal, UAB-IRTA, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
"improperly treated and therefore still infectious materials transferred out of a BSL3/4 facility could lead to potential proliferation of bio-weapons and increase the biohazard to the community"
3. Two Ways to Transfer
A biological sample can reach the outside of a BSL3
area in two ways: either without inactivation (infectious) if it must be transferred to another BSL3 facility
or
after undergoing an inactivation process to render the biological sample non-infectious
1. An FCS insert scenario proposed by @daoyu15 explained by @pathogenetics thus:
"Some say the FCS is not the right sequence "Man" would design, but here @daoyu15 presents the exact workflow "Man" would use to generate the FCS sequence see in COVID-19, with a design rationale"
"HCoV-OC43 cleavage site RRSRR was introduced (in an experiment by Belouzard et al, 2009). A similar experiment in China could use either RRARR or RRSRR from MHV-JHM or HCoV-OC43 via a "Lazy Loop Insertion"