10 years ago @apenwarr wrote "Why bitcoin will fail"
BItcoin is up 15,000x since then, so he published a blog update admitting it may take "more than 50 years" to fail
Me too I can predict anything will fail within X years, if X is large enough 😀 apenwarr.ca/log/20211117
More seriously, he makes really illogical poorly-explained arguments.
1. "Bitcoin doesn't work because of Scams"
There are tons of scams on this thing called "Internet." Does it mean Internet doesn't work?
2. "Bitcoin doesn't work because Citizens use it to move money out of authoritarian regimes"
Well, that's by design. Bitcoin is meant to be censorship-resistant. That's working as expected 🤦♂️
3. "Bitcoin doesn't work because it seems to be a growing percentage of organized crime and trafficking"
Before 2009 Bitcoin did not exist. Therefore between 2009 and 2021 the percentage can only go from ZERO to SOMETHING. There is no way to go from ZERO to NEGATIVE percentage🤦♂️
4. "Bitcoin doesn't work because there are more and more blockchains"
There is a thriving ecosystem of blockchains BECAUSE people are exploring what can & cannot be done with blockchain tech. In no way this implies "Bitcoin doesn't work".
5. "Bitcoin doesn't work because of corrupt or collapsed exchanges"
When the automobile industry started there were thousands of manufacturers. The vast majority collapsed, only for the industry to consolidate into a small number of mfg. Does it mean "cars don't work"?
I could go on and on, but I don't understand at all the bizarre and illogical arguments @apenwarr makes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I found a 521-km sightline from Pik Koroleva. This makes it the 2nd longest sightline on the planet:
Start point 41.080000,77.769167 (Pik Koroleva, elevation 5800 m)
Bearing 188.914568°
End point 36.449604,76.867903 (elevation 6416 m)
1/n
This 521-km sightline was found using a custom multithreaded program that is currently crunching through 2.4 million viewpoints. It will complete the full analysis in about 90 days
Peter highlights "For boys 16-17 without medical comorbidities, the rate of CAE is currently 2.1 to 3.5 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk"
CAE = cardiac adverse event
First, the claim is very specific:
- not all kids, just boys
- not all boys, just 16-17
- not 16-17 boys, just those with zero medical comorbidities
So, from the get go, this implies all other kids could probably still be vaccinated and this being less risky than COVID-19 itself
Notice the new curve "Brazeau" which is 1 of the most comprehensive & recent analysis suggesting covid is more fatal than the flu even at ages as young as 5 years old
All the official sources behind this chart are referenced in the README file: github.com/mbevand/covid1…
The US CDC did update their estimate of the covid IFR on 19 March 2021 (they increased it quite significantly). I missed that update.
This week's update from SCB takes Sweden to 𝟵𝟴,𝟬𝟴𝟭 deaths recorded in year 2020. The country's seeing the worst excess mortality since the 1918 pandemic flu.
This week's data update from SCB puts Sweden past a sad milestone: year 2020 recorded both the most excess *deaths* as well as the highest excess *mortality* (population adjusted) since the 1918 flu pandemic.