#SupremeCourt is hearing a plea by a lawyer who is aggrieved by alleged incorrect marking granted to him in the Advocate in Record examination #AoRExam 
Justice DY Chandrachud: But this is not a maths exam that you will give a sum total. These are descriptive answers, they check English, the flair and other things too #AoRExam
Adv Vivek Sharma: Please see the answer papers. I got 10 marks.
DYC J: yes that's 10 marks
DYC J: yes that's 10 marks
Sharma: Why should not I get 90 to 95 marks here ? Even the initials of examiner in some pages are different
DYC J: But you have got 15 marks
Sharma: in every question there are parts ..
DYC J: If you don't know that in a suit a party is called a plaintiff and defendant then perhaps you should prepare again and appear
Sharma: that was my only one mistake #SupremeCourt
Sharma: in every question there are parts ..
DYC J: If you don't know that in a suit a party is called a plaintiff and defendant then perhaps you should prepare again and appear
Sharma: that was my only one mistake #SupremeCourt
Sharma: I don't want to show loopholes in the system. I just want justice in my case. Loopholes are clear in front of you
Justice AS Bopanna: we are on scope of litigation. We cannot enter brain of examiner and why you got less marks. We can simply dismiss it also. I am only hearing you because you are a lawyer. If there was provision for revaluation we could have ordered. But there is no such thing
Sharma: Under Article 145 and using SC rules, it is your administrative power to order this revaluation.
DYC J: Did you appear after 2019?
Sharma: there was no exam
DYC J: you appear again then. Sorry we cannot convince you. There is no provision for revaluation. Dismissed.
Sharma: there was no exam
DYC J: you appear again then. Sorry we cannot convince you. There is no provision for revaluation. Dismissed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
