Treasury just issued this media advisory on @TreasuryDepSec's speech at 10am Monday, which will unveil Treasury's anti-corruption plans. They're banging the war drum.
The strength of Treasury policies depends a lot on the details, so here's a thread reviewing my recommendations.
Let's start with what @IanTalley and @dnvolz reported last night, which is that in addition to sanctions, Treasury will be taking actions this week to increase the transparency of corporate ownership and close loopholes in the real estate market. wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
With regards to beneficial ownership, FinCEN is expected to release the rule that they've been drafting most of this year prescribing which entities will have to report their ownership information to Treasury. OIRA completed its final review of the draft rule four days ago (⬇️).
Here's my piece recommending how the rule should broadly scope the entities and info covered by the reporting obligations, limit exemptions to companies that already disclose ownership, verify info for accuracy, and broadly ensure timely & easy data access.securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/regulating-ben…
That was before the #PandoraPapers, which revealed lots of dirty money flowing into US trusts. Here's a thread on how FinCEN should write its rule to maximize the extent to which the registry can cover trusts, within some significant statutory constraints.
With regards to real estate, my guess is they'll issue a new rule permanently imposing the reporting obligations title insurers face under geographic targeting orders.
The key details will involve how much the scope is expanded versus current GTOs. I recommend six expansions. ⬇️
Really going big on anti-money laundering rules for the real estate market would mean not just making GTO duties permanent but also expressing an intention to impose AML rules on the full range of real estate professionals (realtors, escrow, lawyers, etc).
Beyond beneficial ownership and real estate, I've been recommending Treasury launch a broader mission to impose AML rules on all manner of professional enablers.
As described below, that would ideally also include antiquities dealers, investment advisors, and art dealers.
Of those additional priorities, the two that I have reason to believe they've been doing some work on are the antiquities rule (left image) and an art market study (right image), both statutorily due Dec. 27). In both cases the key is to capture a broad set of dealers (right).
Lastly on AML, to get Congress moving on more authorities, Treasury could announce it supports the Enablers Act, which is important to pass before the midterms and would give Biden's Treasury plenty of anticorruption implementation to focus on in the final two years in office.
And beyond FinCEN/AML issues, I've recommended a whole-of-Treasury anticorruption strategy, including Int'l Affairs, OFAC, OIA, and others. ⬇️securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/treasurys-war-…
That's my entire wish list. I don't expect Treasury will deliver a majority of these reforms, because frankly corruption hasn't been as high on their agenda as other issues like corporate taxes, pandemic recovery, and climate change. foreignaffairs.com/articles/2021-…
But it's great to see that @TreasuryDepSec has a major speech on this issue and will reportedly deliver reforms around beneficial ownership and real estate transparency. Let's hope for strong details on those issues and maybe a couple more proposals from the wish list above! 🤞
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of the 76 lines of effort announced by the administration today, the single strongest potential move is this one that @TreasuryDepSec just emphasized in his remarks. It's easy to gloss over. A FinCEN advance notice of proposed rulemaking on real estate. But it could be historic.
I recently wrote that "In the modern history of the U.S. Treasury Department, no regulatory decision has done more to let dirty money flow with impunity than the 2002 exemption for real estate professionals [from the anti-money laundering rules enacted after 9/11]."
Today, the White House, FinCEN, and the Treasury Deputy Secretary all made a point of underscoring—at varying levels of detail—that two decades is long enough and so they’re not necessarily limiting their work on real estate transparency to title insurance companies.
It's esp. focused on the transnational dimensions and ability to launder the proceeds of corruption (pillar 2⃣ is the most important), but it's a whole-of-government strategy with five pillars:
1⃣ US government
2⃣ Illicit finance
3⃣ Accountability
4⃣ Multilateral
5⃣ Foreign aid
Boom—lawmakers to respond to the #PandoraPapers with landmark bipartisan legislation that would make professional enablers watch out for dirty money! 🧵politico.com/news/2021/10/0…
The ENABLERS Act—to be introduced Friday—would require lawyers, investment advisers, art dealers, realtors, accountants, PR firms, and others to ensure their clients' money isn't of suspicious origin. That's exactly what's recommended by my recent research!securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/regulating-the…
And it makes sense that it's inspired by the #PandoraPapers, because the leaked revelations implicate all these enablers. Here are 4⃣ US-tied examples involving trust administrators, financial advisors, real estate professionals, art dealers, and law firms.icij.org/investigations…
Big story about how @MorganStanley and @IBKR are under investigation for handling the suspicious money of corrupt Venezuelan officials.
It's striking how the dirty money hopped from one financial institution to another w/o signs of triggering reporting. 🧵wsj.com/articles/morga…
This pattern reminds me of how the dirty money of kleptocrat Teodorin Obiang of Equatorial Guinea played hopscotch across 6 US banks over 4 years, moving to the next bank every time compliance officers caught on.
In the case reported today, when @MorganStanley realized it was holding the Venezuelans' dirty money, the account simply moved to another U.S. brokerage (Capital Guardian, later Avenir Private Advisors), which was kicked out of FINRA, at which point the money moved on to @IBKR.
Ten types of U.S. professionals endanger national security by handling dirty money, such as lawyers, realtors, portfolio managers, and art dealers paid by kleptocrats and oligarchs.
Based on those considerations, @USTreasury should strategically sequence a big regulatory rollout by the end of Biden's term, starting with easy wins (at the summit for democracy) before gauging whether there's political appetite in D.C. to fight the four horsemen of dirty money.
Having spent the past week thinking about how to regulate firms offering “black PR” (as in black ops meant to be deniable, like anti-vax disinfo from Moscow), I found this news of “white PR” to advocate for vaccination to be interesting and inspired. 🧵 nytimes.com/2021/08/01/tec…
Here’s the case that got me concerned about this influence vector last week. An secret funder in Moscow—whose identify was laundered by a PR front—paid YouTube influencers to spread disinfo that Pfizer vaccines kill, not disclosing the sponsorship. bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…
When the good guys start fighting fire with fire by adopting these tactics, it usually doesn’t work out too well for democracy. Take the Philippines, where it hasn’t helped Duterte’s opponents win elections, just normalized disinfo by competing PR firms. buzzfeednews.com/article/craigs…