It's esp. focused on the transnational dimensions and ability to launder the proceeds of corruption (pillar 2⃣ is the most important), but it's a whole-of-government strategy with five pillars:
1⃣ US government
2⃣ Illicit finance
3⃣ Accountability
4⃣ Multilateral
5⃣ Foreign aid
This is the big one, folks. Beyond just the statutorily required regs on beneficial ownership, they're issuing new regs for real estate, re-examining AML rules for investment advisors, and working with Congress on legislation like the ENABLERS Act!
Let's go through this one in detail, given it's the most powerful pillar.
On real estate, the appendix in the back says Treasury will issue regulations with reporting requirements for those with valuable info on real estate transactions. That's very impressive in its breadth!
Sure enough, this morning Treasury issued a notice of proposed rulemaking aiming to extend the ownership reporting obligations that title insurers currently face under GTOs to be permanent, nationwide, with no threshold, and include commercial real estate. fincen.gov/news/news-rele…
Importantly though, Treasury's notice also invites comments on going further, either by including others (like lawyers, realtors, escrow agents, etc.) in the reporting requirement or by imposing full AML obligations (CDD, SARs, etc.) on them. We've been waiting 20 years for that!
While it had been reported recently that Treasury was looking at real estate regs (although not nearly that broad), Treasury will also re-examine the 2015 draft rule for investment advisors and they're open to expanding it to cover private placement funds offered by the firms. 👍
That re-examination should include six expansions. ⬇️
Beyond real estate and investment advisors, the administration wants to work with Congress to secure additional authorities covering lawyers, accountants, TCSPs, and others (left image).
In all but name, this is a Biden administration endorsement of the ENABLERS Act (right img)!
And while those are the top news-making headlines in pillar 2⃣ on curbing illicit finance, there's more in there as well, including aggressive enforcement, offshore finance, digital assets, art and antiquities, and commitment to cover additional sectors.
3⃣ Accountability
The news headline here is that the admin. is launching a host of new programs at @USTreasury, @StateDept (working with partner democracies to fight safe haven!), & @USAID (global accountability program!) to hold crooks accountable, going well beyond sanctions!
4⃣ Multilateral architecture
The administration will redouble anti-corruption efforts across the range of multilateral fora, including the OECD, OAS, UNCAC, NATO, G20, G7, OGP, EITI, etc.
This gives US missions to these bodies important marching orders to prioritize corruption.
5⃣ Diplomacy & foreign assistance
This pillar is last but not least, second in importance to illicit finance. Diplomats/embassies/aid will prioritize corruption. The US will reevaluate aid criteria, scale it up/down, etc. The last bullet is seemingly on Afghanistan among others.
Oops, I attached the wrong image there. That one was about recommended GTO expansion priorities. I meant to attach this one about recommended expansions to the investment advisor rule proposed in 2015. ⬇️
In sum, the breadth of this @WhiteHouse strategy—especially with the details in the appendix and more announcements coming from the agencies all week (@USTreasury today, @USAID tomorrow, etc)—makes it the most sweeping anti-corruption policy initiative in American history. 👏👏👏
Actually, let’s give the last word to @SecYellen & @PowerUSAID, who are leading @USTreasury & @USAID to steal the show this week, using their policy levers and strong voices to kick off the Summit for Democracy w/ a bang and tee up a year of action. 👏👏👏 washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of the 76 lines of effort announced by the administration today, the single strongest potential move is this one that @TreasuryDepSec just emphasized in his remarks. It's easy to gloss over. A FinCEN advance notice of proposed rulemaking on real estate. But it could be historic.
I recently wrote that "In the modern history of the U.S. Treasury Department, no regulatory decision has done more to let dirty money flow with impunity than the 2002 exemption for real estate professionals [from the anti-money laundering rules enacted after 9/11]."
Today, the White House, FinCEN, and the Treasury Deputy Secretary all made a point of underscoring—at varying levels of detail—that two decades is long enough and so they’re not necessarily limiting their work on real estate transparency to title insurance companies.
Treasury just issued this media advisory on @TreasuryDepSec's speech at 10am Monday, which will unveil Treasury's anti-corruption plans. They're banging the war drum.
The strength of Treasury policies depends a lot on the details, so here's a thread reviewing my recommendations.
Let's start with what @IanTalley and @dnvolz reported last night, which is that in addition to sanctions, Treasury will be taking actions this week to increase the transparency of corporate ownership and close loopholes in the real estate market. wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
With regards to beneficial ownership, FinCEN is expected to release the rule that they've been drafting most of this year prescribing which entities will have to report their ownership information to Treasury. OIRA completed its final review of the draft rule four days ago (⬇️).
Boom—lawmakers to respond to the #PandoraPapers with landmark bipartisan legislation that would make professional enablers watch out for dirty money! 🧵politico.com/news/2021/10/0…
The ENABLERS Act—to be introduced Friday—would require lawyers, investment advisers, art dealers, realtors, accountants, PR firms, and others to ensure their clients' money isn't of suspicious origin. That's exactly what's recommended by my recent research!securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/regulating-the…
And it makes sense that it's inspired by the #PandoraPapers, because the leaked revelations implicate all these enablers. Here are 4⃣ US-tied examples involving trust administrators, financial advisors, real estate professionals, art dealers, and law firms.icij.org/investigations…
Big story about how @MorganStanley and @IBKR are under investigation for handling the suspicious money of corrupt Venezuelan officials.
It's striking how the dirty money hopped from one financial institution to another w/o signs of triggering reporting. 🧵wsj.com/articles/morga…
This pattern reminds me of how the dirty money of kleptocrat Teodorin Obiang of Equatorial Guinea played hopscotch across 6 US banks over 4 years, moving to the next bank every time compliance officers caught on.
In the case reported today, when @MorganStanley realized it was holding the Venezuelans' dirty money, the account simply moved to another U.S. brokerage (Capital Guardian, later Avenir Private Advisors), which was kicked out of FINRA, at which point the money moved on to @IBKR.
Ten types of U.S. professionals endanger national security by handling dirty money, such as lawyers, realtors, portfolio managers, and art dealers paid by kleptocrats and oligarchs.
Based on those considerations, @USTreasury should strategically sequence a big regulatory rollout by the end of Biden's term, starting with easy wins (at the summit for democracy) before gauging whether there's political appetite in D.C. to fight the four horsemen of dirty money.
Having spent the past week thinking about how to regulate firms offering “black PR” (as in black ops meant to be deniable, like anti-vax disinfo from Moscow), I found this news of “white PR” to advocate for vaccination to be interesting and inspired. 🧵 nytimes.com/2021/08/01/tec…
Here’s the case that got me concerned about this influence vector last week. An secret funder in Moscow—whose identify was laundered by a PR front—paid YouTube influencers to spread disinfo that Pfizer vaccines kill, not disclosing the sponsorship. bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…
When the good guys start fighting fire with fire by adopting these tactics, it usually doesn’t work out too well for democracy. Take the Philippines, where it hasn’t helped Duterte’s opponents win elections, just normalized disinfo by competing PR firms. buzzfeednews.com/article/craigs…