Of the 76 lines of effort announced by the administration today, the single strongest potential move is this one that @TreasuryDepSec just emphasized in his remarks. It's easy to gloss over. A FinCEN advance notice of proposed rulemaking on real estate. But it could be historic.
I recently wrote that "In the modern history of the U.S. Treasury Department, no regulatory decision has done more to let dirty money flow with impunity than the 2002 exemption for real estate professionals [from the anti-money laundering rules enacted after 9/11]."
Today, the White House, FinCEN, and the Treasury Deputy Secretary all made a point of underscoring—at varying levels of detail—that two decades is long enough and so they’re not necessarily limiting their work on real estate transparency to title insurance companies.
This will be the most important policy opening to seize upon in the "year of action" between the two summits for democracy. The ANPRM issued by FinCEN today says they plan to make expanded GTOs for title insurers permanent but they're also open to full AML for the whole industry.
There's a reason why full AML has never happened for realtors, real estate lawyers, and others. They have powerful lobbies in DC and—unlike banks—a presence in every Congressional district. This is going to be a showdown, but one in which Treasury has all the authority it needs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's esp. focused on the transnational dimensions and ability to launder the proceeds of corruption (pillar 2⃣ is the most important), but it's a whole-of-government strategy with five pillars:
1⃣ US government
2⃣ Illicit finance
3⃣ Accountability
4⃣ Multilateral
5⃣ Foreign aid
Treasury just issued this media advisory on @TreasuryDepSec's speech at 10am Monday, which will unveil Treasury's anti-corruption plans. They're banging the war drum.
The strength of Treasury policies depends a lot on the details, so here's a thread reviewing my recommendations.
Let's start with what @IanTalley and @dnvolz reported last night, which is that in addition to sanctions, Treasury will be taking actions this week to increase the transparency of corporate ownership and close loopholes in the real estate market. wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
With regards to beneficial ownership, FinCEN is expected to release the rule that they've been drafting most of this year prescribing which entities will have to report their ownership information to Treasury. OIRA completed its final review of the draft rule four days ago (⬇️).
Boom—lawmakers to respond to the #PandoraPapers with landmark bipartisan legislation that would make professional enablers watch out for dirty money! 🧵politico.com/news/2021/10/0…
The ENABLERS Act—to be introduced Friday—would require lawyers, investment advisers, art dealers, realtors, accountants, PR firms, and others to ensure their clients' money isn't of suspicious origin. That's exactly what's recommended by my recent research!securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/regulating-the…
And it makes sense that it's inspired by the #PandoraPapers, because the leaked revelations implicate all these enablers. Here are 4⃣ US-tied examples involving trust administrators, financial advisors, real estate professionals, art dealers, and law firms.icij.org/investigations…
Big story about how @MorganStanley and @IBKR are under investigation for handling the suspicious money of corrupt Venezuelan officials.
It's striking how the dirty money hopped from one financial institution to another w/o signs of triggering reporting. 🧵wsj.com/articles/morga…
This pattern reminds me of how the dirty money of kleptocrat Teodorin Obiang of Equatorial Guinea played hopscotch across 6 US banks over 4 years, moving to the next bank every time compliance officers caught on.
In the case reported today, when @MorganStanley realized it was holding the Venezuelans' dirty money, the account simply moved to another U.S. brokerage (Capital Guardian, later Avenir Private Advisors), which was kicked out of FINRA, at which point the money moved on to @IBKR.
Ten types of U.S. professionals endanger national security by handling dirty money, such as lawyers, realtors, portfolio managers, and art dealers paid by kleptocrats and oligarchs.
Based on those considerations, @USTreasury should strategically sequence a big regulatory rollout by the end of Biden's term, starting with easy wins (at the summit for democracy) before gauging whether there's political appetite in D.C. to fight the four horsemen of dirty money.
Having spent the past week thinking about how to regulate firms offering “black PR” (as in black ops meant to be deniable, like anti-vax disinfo from Moscow), I found this news of “white PR” to advocate for vaccination to be interesting and inspired. 🧵 nytimes.com/2021/08/01/tec…
Here’s the case that got me concerned about this influence vector last week. An secret funder in Moscow—whose identify was laundered by a PR front—paid YouTube influencers to spread disinfo that Pfizer vaccines kill, not disclosing the sponsorship. bbc.com/news/blogs-tre…
When the good guys start fighting fire with fire by adopting these tactics, it usually doesn’t work out too well for democracy. Take the Philippines, where it hasn’t helped Duterte’s opponents win elections, just normalized disinfo by competing PR firms. buzzfeednews.com/article/craigs…