1/ I don't care much about this latest dump because I've been methodically taking profit on almost all my investments.
I've talked about this before in other tweets, but in this I will show you real world example with $UOS.
2/ I love $UOS, I think it is an awesome project and I believe that it is a long term gem. I want to build up a large bag of UOS by buying the dips.
When people say "buy the dip" they never explain where the money comes from. Are you meant to have an unlimited supply?
3/ Buying the dip requires you to take profit at key levels and reinvest on dips. Many say, "what if no dip?". Well in that case you can't buy back in, and you won't make as much money as you would have had you held. However, there is almost always a dip, so odds are you get one.
4/ The chart above shows sensible profit taking and reinvesting on the dip.
I got into UOS late, so I employed an aggressive profit taking strategy. If I get in early, I take a more gradual approach.
5/ In this case, I tried to secure my initial investment asap by taking half out at +50%. For example, if I invested $50k, and I was at $75k I would take $25k out, this is half of my initial $50k investment.
6/ The point here is that if $BTC crashes 90% and UOS follows, I have already made enough profit.
Last time I tweeted this, some smooth brains said "AS IF YOU PICK THE BOTTOMS PERFECT". Well I didn't, I just buy support and sell resistance.
PLAY THE LEVELS
7/ The reason I reinvested 30% of profits on the first buyback and only 10% on the second is that by the second I had taken more profit out.
This is not a knock on UOS. My ultimate goal is to buy more UOS as I believe Ultra will be a competitor to steam in coming years.
8/ Ultimately, I am a trader and I need to be able to take profit, so I can reinvest into other projects.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ #Tokenomics are essential when researching a project. You can eliminate 50% of projects on tokenomics alone. In this tokenomics MEGA-THREAD I'll break down BEGINNER tokenomics. In this one, I'll break down vesting and presale investors.
Keep reading below.
2/ -CIRCULATING VS. TOTAL-
Most #cryptos will not release their total supply at launch. Supply will be released slowly over time. Bitcoin is an example of this. It has a total of 21m and a circulating supply of 18.89m.
3/ -TIME TO TOTAL (TTT)-
TTT is the time it will take for the total supply to be reached. If you see a new project with a total supply of 10m, a circulating supply on release of 500k, you know there are 9.5m tokens unreleased.
When will they release? This is important to know.
When I pick a good crypto I take profit religiously and reinvest the dips, or into other projects.
I research my ass off to find projects early. When I do get in late I scale in dips instead of ape.
I have a small team and we share research.
Success isn't always being right. It's about accepting when you're wrong and learning from it. It's also about working as hard as you can to achieve your goals.
2/ -POTENTIAL-
Metaverse is a booming sector. A $25m market cap would put this in the top 80 metaverse. In my opinion this is much higher than a top 80. Long-term I would expect a market cap of a few hundred million.
This is not financial advice, it's my personal expectation.
3/ -TOKENOMICS-
The tokenomics for CRAFT are phenomenal. 1.7m circulating supply at the moment, the max supply is 30m but there is a burning mechanism which will eat away 5m of the supply.
CRAFT is required in order to play the game, which will keep demand for the token high.
2/ This chart shows $MVI, which is the Metaverse index, an index of several MV cryptos overlaid on a $BTC chart.
Since the end of September MV has decoupled from BTC. This was due to Zuckerberg changing FBs name to Meta. News based decoupling is common and not noteworthy.
3/ From the 10th of November, things have become strange. We are seeing a true decoupling. Last week I thought it was momentary and things would reset. One week later the gap is only getting bigger.