The gravity of remarks like that one (on which he then doubled down) is that anybody into crypto for more than a few months knew that "whale" was an exchange. The patterns were unmistakable.
The fact the CEO of an exchange pushed this rhetoric is disquieting and manipulative.
Indian shibes pointed me to the story of how @WazirXIndia, owned by Binance, pushed the "other" dog token while Dogecoin was at ATH, allowing withdrawals for it from day one, while #Dogecoin has been in "rapid listing" limbo for a long time.
And the list goes on.
On top of this, holding on an exchange allows them to use your #Doge in ways you do not want to. @binance acts as a liquidity provider for many entities, for example.
We must take liquidity off the table. If you do not need to trade with it, keep your Doge in your wallet.
Recent movements by Binance also allow us to ask the question whether @binance (and other exchanges) is selling real #Doge or IOUs.
This market is vastly unregulated, so practices that are already illegal or frowned upon in other markets can and will happen in crypto.
When withdrawing #Doge, avoid using the BSC network UNLESS you plan to trade BSC-Doge right away by using the withdrawal channel Patrick, #Doge Core Dev, has created to convert it into "real" Doge using renBridge. BSC-Doge is just an IOU. More on this:
The aim of real FUD spread around #Dogecoin throughout the year (it has no devs; it has no future; it must be capped; a whale holds 30% of the supply) is exactly aimed at killing sentiment and making people sell and lose interest, because they think there is no hope.
Alongside FUD, institutional investors and speculators driving the price, marketing ploys by exchanges pushing towards other tokens, and in general any attempt to gain control of the liquidity are aimed at manipulating the sentiment and interest of the public. #Doge
We talked a lot about why holding on ANY exchange should not be done.
The recent wallet incident anyhow, also through the official press release released by #Binance, points at the fact their infrastructure was obsolete and/or not maintained with the needed care. #DOGE
The first hint is that they had been using Dogecoin Core 1.14.0, a version released in 2019 (2 years and a half ago). This is prehistoric by cryptocurrency standards.
The second hint is that they seem to have ignored recommendations provided to them by the #Dogecoin devs.
You can also check the thread below by Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin, explaining how #Litecoin/#Dogecoin "merged" mining works and benefits both blockchains.
As per their official press release, because of mishandling of the upgrade of their wallets, in November, @binance sent out duplicates of old transactions from 2019 to 1634 users.
These accounts have been marked as in "arrears" and asked to return the extra $Doge.
The changes introduced in Dogecoin 1.14.4-1.14.5 caused those old transactions to become unstuck and being sent over few minutes to 1600+ users, to wallet addresses many of those have no longer access to.
As a response, Binance shut everything down at once. For 3+ weeks.
Many #doge holders wrote me today asking for help: they have been receiving warnings about their margin accounts being liquidated.
We must educate to avoid these tools, and warn against false friends that push newbies to add gasoline to the fire that is the crypto market.
Several of these shibes were new to crypto when they were introduced by their "buddies" to margin and futures trading. To the point that many of them think these tools are an integral part of crypto and #dogecoin.
They are NOT!
What do we say to those pushing these tools?
Experienced traders and those with vast amounts of liquidity can try their chance at gambling with this. But believe me, many are not as "experienced" as they think they are.
You are against organizations and institutional investors that have a lot more information then you do.