Coincidentally, we've been at ~$0.18 24h ago and went into very slow and steady buying (no aping) in the following 13h.
/2
In best-case scenario, with similar steady buying, at the end of LBP window we might arrive at $0.14.
You won't see $WHALE any cheaper than that, not in this LBP.
This means, the bottom of $0.13 is already in - that was the best moment to buy *and* it won't happen again.
/3
More realistic estimate (my gut feeling) is that we will oscillate between $0.18 and $0.22.
If we're lucky, a chance to buy the range $0.15 - $0.18 might come, but I am personally not counting on it. Hoping - yes, but not very convinced it will come.
Any launch has 3 somewhat separate phases: 1) Early financing 2) Price discovery 3) Listing
/2
1) Early financing
Things to try:
* Public sale with a number of channels
* Including a public sale channel without KYC
* Building a warchest / treasury
* Long vesting period for the public sale, even longer for team/VCs
/3
Let's make it simple - LP tokens are just like any other yield-bearing token and refracting those is on the roadmap for the Prism Protocol.
Why would I want to refract them at all? I am glad you asked!
/2
I can think of a few reasons we do LP:
(1) High yield / incentives (2) We are bullish on a couple of tokens and want higher APR than single-asset staking (3) Continuous cashflow (4) Farming event ($APOLLO, $HALO, etc.)
There's possibly some more, but that's not the point
/3
I did some math around @play_nity allocations and arrived at a different result than yours. ๐คจ
Could you lend me a hand, please? In absence of clear guidance it is difficult to prepare a tool to estimate future allocation.
๐งต๐
/1
I have joined the IDO as a member of #LUNAtics faction.
Lunatics ranked 2nd. In previous IDOs that meant 30% of gamified pool would go to Lunatics - I assume that's true for $PLY as well, though the article did not mention that explicitly.
/2
That would mean total allocation to Lunatics faction is:
15% (standard) + 15% * 30% (gamified) = 19.5%
With total raise of 420k UST, 19.5% translates to 81.9k UST total allocation.
/3
Originally, I planned on describing fixed-rate borrowing. After doing more homework I could not figure out, how it would work, so I decided to settle on fixed-rate lending.
We tend to fall into a certain thinking pattern(s):
(1) Crypto never sleeps (2) I need to be connected 24/7 (3) Staying on top of all the developments is a must (4) I want/have_to know about every project there is
/2