Any launch has 3 somewhat separate phases: 1) Early financing 2) Price discovery 3) Listing
/2
1) Early financing
Things to try:
* Public sale with a number of channels
* Including a public sale channel without KYC
* Building a warchest / treasury
* Long vesting period for the public sale, even longer for team/VCs
/3
1) Early financing - cont.
Things to avoid:
* No public sale β from VC funding straight to listing
* Inappropriate allocation of total token supply to VC, team and advisors
/4
2) Price discovery
Things to try:
* LBP
* Pylon Scout
* Asymmetric LP seeding
* Protocol-owned Liquidity (PoL)
Things to avoid:
* Skipping price discovery
/5
3) Listing on an exchange
Things to avoid:
* Listing with a low liquidity
* Listing without price discovery
Things to try:
* Estimate the LP size needed
* Pre-seed liquidity
/6
Additional general remarks:
Things to avoid:
* Crappy / infrequent communications
* Starting any part (especially public sale, price discovery and listing) without having communicated the whole plan
* Regular airdrops
* Unconditional airdrops
/7
Things to try:
* Accept feedback and seek understanding
* Donβt worry to change your mind/approach, but make sure the community knows where youβre coming from
* Own up your mistakes
* Being honest, straightforward, humble
/8-end
Tagging some protocols that are yet to launch in hope you'll find it useful.
Let's make it simple - LP tokens are just like any other yield-bearing token and refracting those is on the roadmap for the Prism Protocol.
Why would I want to refract them at all? I am glad you asked!
/2
I can think of a few reasons we do LP:
(1) High yield / incentives (2) We are bullish on a couple of tokens and want higher APR than single-asset staking (3) Continuous cashflow (4) Farming event ($APOLLO, $HALO, etc.)
There's possibly some more, but that's not the point
/3
I did some math around @play_nity allocations and arrived at a different result than yours. π€¨
Could you lend me a hand, please? In absence of clear guidance it is difficult to prepare a tool to estimate future allocation.
π§΅π
/1
I have joined the IDO as a member of #LUNAtics faction.
Lunatics ranked 2nd. In previous IDOs that meant 30% of gamified pool would go to Lunatics - I assume that's true for $PLY as well, though the article did not mention that explicitly.
/2
That would mean total allocation to Lunatics faction is:
15% (standard) + 15% * 30% (gamified) = 19.5%
With total raise of 420k UST, 19.5% translates to 81.9k UST total allocation.
/3