If I were a decision-maker, right now I would keep both the IDO and the airdrop - for different reasons.
There is a part of community staking $STT which might have not participated in the LBP exactly because of the already announced launch of $WHALE on @StarTerra_io.
/6
Cancelling the IDO would mean leaving them out cold - not a fun move.
Selling at a somewhat below-market price is something that likely everyone expected, including LBP participants, so there should be no problem here, right?
/7
Plus, @pylon_protocol is selling $WHALE at very low prices still.
About the airdrop - it seems we will be able to stake $WHALE and get $xWHALE and then lock it to get $vxWHALE.
(Sounds similar to that $ASTRO thing)
@WhiteWhaleTerra would like to distribute $WHALE airdrop to long-term holders, if at all.
I have an idea on how to do it.
/9
Why not distribute make it into a lockdrop?
One would need to stake and lock $WHALE to get extra $WHALE airdrop - the more/longer you lock, the more you get.
Adding a cliff and vesting on top (e.g. 3m cliff + 9m vesting) should discourage the airdrop dumpers quite a bit.
/10
With audit on its way, there is hope that the arb vaults will be launched in mid- to late January.
Thatβs good - the community should not need to wait too long as weird thoughts might start appearing in our heads (like: sell and buy that new thing).
/11
Gov staking will be enable pretty soon after the audit, with rewards paid out in $WHALE (freshly minted).
To avoid diluting the supply, gov staking APR will be a little lower than the APR of the protocol treasury.
/12
Treasury will grow faster than the total supply = floor price go up.
So far, pretty well-designed.
/12
I quite like how things will be structured around the vaults.
Each vault will be dedicated to a token (e.g. $UST or $LUNA) and leverage multiple arb strategies. In absence of arb opportunities capital will be earning passive income, e.g. Anchor Earn for $UST.
/13
$UST from the @WhiteWhaleTerra treasury will be deployed to the $UST vault.
(Educated guess follows)
As time goes by, I expect more assets to be included in the treasury and deposited to the vaults, building price floor for the $WHALE intrinsically.
/14-end
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Any launch has 3 somewhat separate phases: 1) Early financing 2) Price discovery 3) Listing
/2
1) Early financing
Things to try:
* Public sale with a number of channels
* Including a public sale channel without KYC
* Building a warchest / treasury
* Long vesting period for the public sale, even longer for team/VCs
/3
Let's make it simple - LP tokens are just like any other yield-bearing token and refracting those is on the roadmap for the Prism Protocol.
Why would I want to refract them at all? I am glad you asked!
/2
I can think of a few reasons we do LP:
(1) High yield / incentives (2) We are bullish on a couple of tokens and want higher APR than single-asset staking (3) Continuous cashflow (4) Farming event ($APOLLO, $HALO, etc.)
There's possibly some more, but that's not the point
/3
I did some math around @play_nity allocations and arrived at a different result than yours. π€¨
Could you lend me a hand, please? In absence of clear guidance it is difficult to prepare a tool to estimate future allocation.
π§΅π
/1
I have joined the IDO as a member of #LUNAtics faction.
Lunatics ranked 2nd. In previous IDOs that meant 30% of gamified pool would go to Lunatics - I assume that's true for $PLY as well, though the article did not mention that explicitly.
/2
That would mean total allocation to Lunatics faction is:
15% (standard) + 15% * 30% (gamified) = 19.5%
With total raise of 420k UST, 19.5% translates to 81.9k UST total allocation.
/3