This thing has rapidly become the world’s exasperating good news/bad news story. If your head isn’t spinning, you’re not paying attention.
A 🧵on my take on both the good news & the bad, with an emphasis on the things that have changed in the past few days... or minutes.(1/25)
Bad news: Omicron has exploded in the U.S., weeks before we thought it would. As recently as 2 weeks ago, most experts thought this would be a January issue, not a December one. The rapid uptick nationally, particularly in cities like NYC, Miami, & Houston, is jaw-dropping.(2/25)
Even here in SF, the nation’s most vaccinated (and likely boosted) city – and a city where masking is still the norm – we’re now seeing the familiar northward-facing curve (Figure). It’s now clear that no place in the U.S. will be spared a direct hit from Omicron.(3/25)
Good news: What goes up must come down, in life & Covid. The new data that Omicron cases in South Africa have peaked and are now falling is comforting. thehill.com/changing-ameri… Omicron may turn out to be a 6-8 week hurricane, doing a lot of damage but moving through quickly.(4/25)
More good news: evidence for lower severity is increasingly persuasive, incl. new data from UK. reuters.com/business/healt…
How much less severe is not yet clear – I’m going with a 30-50% lower rate of hospitalization as my governing assumption, subject to change w/ more data.(5/25)
Bad news: as has been said ad nauseam, if there are 3 times more cases & severity/case is 40% lower, that’ll still result in far more hospitalizations & deaths than w/ Delta (which was truly awful). Moreover, after two years, just hearing “less severe” will be enough for…(6/25)
… many people to avoid taking extra precautions, whether masks or vax/boosters. Since so much of Covid is determined by behavior rather than biology & physics, a lack of behavioral modification could lead to far more cases than if there was no “less severe” narrative.(7/25)
Good news: we don’t have to worry about mask supply –there are plenty of reasonably comfy N95’s around. Given Omi's increased infectivity, I'm nearly always choosing an N95 if it's a mask-up situation. The virus has upped its game; we need to up our protection.(8/25)
More good news: In late '21, we have tools to “rescue” people, particularly those at-risk, if they get Covid. The main evidence-based tools are monoclonal antibodies and, as of today, the Pfizer drug Paxlovid. The MAbs reduce hospitalization by ~70%, Paxlovid by nearly 90%.(9/25)
Bad news: The MAbs that your hospital has stocked (likely Regeneron or Lilly) no longer work against Omicron. The one that will work (GSK's Sotrovimab) is in massively short supply. Moreover, lab tests show some loss in GSK's efficacy as well. nature.com/articles/d4158….(10/25)
So, while MAbs might have lowered Delta risk by 2/3rds, we can't ensure access to an effective MAb for Omi.
Note the symmetry here: for hi-risk unvaxxed people, Omicron might be milder, but one of the key tools we had (w/ a similar risk reduction) might not be available.(11/25)
Paxlovid, which got EUA today, is a true game-changer: a 5d pill that reduces risk of hospitalization by 89%. cnbc.com/2021/12/22/fda… But here too there are problems: you’ll need to get diagnosed quickly, & tests (whether PCR or antigen) are incredibly hard to come by…(12/25)
…and then you’ll need access to the drug. Pfizer anticipates having 180K doses by January 1 – there were 190,000 Americans dxed w/ Covid YESTERDAY! So as Covid cases soar, we'll see real bottlenecks in access to the meds (MAbs & Paxlovid mostly) that can truly lower risk.(13/25)
Good news: our tests – both PCR & antigen – still work fine w/ Omicron. Bad news: these too will be in enormously short supply when we need them most – both to trigger a prescription for Paxlovid (which may not be in stock anyway) or, as we’ve been touting, to use...(14/25)
…as a tool to create a safe space for a get-together or in workplace/school. Biden's announcement of 500M tests in Jan, while welcome, is too little & too late. We should've been working on making these tests free & accessible for months, as many other nations have done.(15/25)
Bad news: old incubation period rules (5d) aren’t right anymore. At least from Norway X-Mas party study, it looks shorter than that: 2-3d. eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280… This’ll put a premium on earlier testing & faster tracing, both hard to do. We still don’t know what Omicron…(16/25)
… does to the infectious period – maybe you get sick sooner but clear it faster? Dunno. We need to sort this out stat – if every infected MD/RN is forced to stay home for 7-10 days, I don’t see how we can staff our hospitals & clinics. By report, @nyulangone has gone to…(17/25)
… 5 days of isolation for asymptomatic vaccinated healthcare workers (w/ neg rapid tests days 4-5), which seems logical to me, though many will wait for CDC to bless this strategy. Fauci raised this yesterday as a crucial issue, and he’s right. beckershospitalreview.com/infection-cont… (18/25)
Good news: vax (& booster) still works for Omi. Bad news: you really need boost for real protection – 1 or 2 shots won’t cut it, & prior infection is of limited help. And we may end up needing a 4th shot, as Israel has begun for high-risk people. nytimes.com/2021/12/22/wor… (19/25)
And more bad news: 40% of our fellow citizens have made the foolish choice not to get a remarkably effective and safe vaccine that has saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the U.S. And if they haven’t taken it yet, I can’t imagine many will do it now, particularly…(20/25)
… as the “less severe” narrative takes hold (largely without the nuance and caveats it requires). These unvaccinated folks will almost certainly get Omicron. Luckily, the vast majority will survive. But tens of thousands will die unnecessarily, compounding the tragedy.(21/25)
More bad news: After 2 yrs, we don’t understand much about Long Covid, & don’t know its prevalence w/ Omicron, after vax, etc. It remains a hardship for millions, and a lingering concern for me as I think about the prospect of getting even a “mild” case of Omicron.(22/25)
Good news: it's possible that – when dust settles from this Omicron surge – we’ll find ourselves in a fairly good place: with a dominant virus that is, in fact, milder than Delta, with virtually everybody having some immunity from either infection or vaccination,…(23/25)
… and with ready access to testing and oral antivirals to help us manage a small number of ongoing cases – leading to lower rates of transmission and fewer bad outcomes.(24/25)
The bad news: virtually every piece of good news in the two years of this damn pandemic has been followed by bad news.
(25/end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bottom line from these preliminary studies: looks like Omi's per case hospitalization rate ...(1/4)
... is ⬇50-70% compared w/ Delta's. But once in hospital, studies find similar risk of "severe disease" (eg, ICU admit). Impact on death rates? Too soon to say.
Findings are good news overall (equal severity would be awful), though need more data to be sure – the stakes...(2/4)
are just too high. The studies don't tell us if the lower case-hospitalization rate is due to a ⬇in the inherent virulence of Omicron, vs. the impact of immunity from vaccines or past Covid.
Your friendly reminder that we'll likely see case rates that rise by more... (3/4)
This is one of the most confusing times of the pandemic, w/ a firehose of new Omicron data (lots of fab work on #medtwitter putting it into context). In this (long) 🧵, I'll offer my take on how the new information is changing my thinking & behavior.(1/25)
I'll start with a few general principles & observations (to save space & time I’m largely going to omit primary data – it’s out there; follow @EricTopol to keep up): 1) Things are uber-dynamic. We have far more clarity now than we had 3 wks ago, but many unknowns remain...(2/25)
...More infectious: yes, not sure by how much. Immune evasion: definitely. Severity: conflicting data from UK & So. Africa, even today. Could mean it's same as Delta, could mean it's moderately less. Doubt it's more severe or massively less severe. We'll learn more soon.(3/25)
Latest twist in "aspirin for primary prevention" story (rec: don't do it) hits home. nytimes.com/2021/10/12/hea… When I was in med school, I told my dad (age 52) to take an ASA daily. He was a stressed-out guy, heart attacks were common, & early evidence on ASA was supportive.(1/8)🧵
A few months later, I got a call that he had passed out on the train. The cause: a huge upper GI bleed. I felt terrible – I was pretty sure that my aspirin had caused his bleed. This was, in essence, my first prescription, and I'd nearly killed my father. I rushed home. (2/8)
The GI doc let me watch as he performed dad's endoscopy, expecting to find stomach inflammation or an ulcer. I heard the doc gasp when he found a large polyp at the stomach-esophagus junction – it was clearly not what he expected to see. Turns out it was a stomach cancer. (3/8)
Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles,Day 521
I can't resist one more thread on boosters. I see lots of debate on data: about antibody levels, infections vs severe infctns, etc. I don't see much about the big issue: the tension between 2 perspectives – that of individuals vs. society.(1/25🧵)
It's particularly tricky when talking about a global pandemic since (as we've learned, painfully) no person is an island: individual behavior impacts the collective & vice versa. In pandemics, there's also the matter of who comprises the collective: just domestic or global?(2/25)
For those who don't follow healthcare closely, you've stumbled into a longstanding tension in health policy, one that maps pretty well to two different and (mostly) fraternal fields: clinical medicine and public health.
As a physician (though one with public health... (3/25)
Lots of criticism of new booster plans, much of it re: how much of ⬇efficacy # s are due to confounding vs truly ⬇effectiveness. To me, it seems incontrovertible that vax effectiveness is ⬇significantly, though amount of drop – particularly vs severe cases – is unclear.(1/7🧵)
I'm in support of the new booster plans. This is anecdotal, but in past week I've heard of 2 fully vaxxed people in 70s who died of Covid. With Delta & waning vax effectiveness, this will happen. Even if failure to wear masks contributed to the cases, that'll happen too. (2/7)
We can make two types of errors here: acting too early and acting too late. Given that it'll take 4-6 months to roll out boosters to 200M people, I think we need to skate to where the puck is going. To my reading, the evidence we have regarding waning vax effectiveness... (3/7)
To me, the most confusing time in the pandemic was May 2020, as we exited lockdown and nobody quite knew what they should & shouldn’t do (clean the mail? touch the dog?).
But now is giving May 2020 a run for its money. (🧵1/25)
Today, a smorgasbord of some of the most confusing issues: Delta, masking, vaccine efficacy, vax mandates, boosters.
Bottom line is that my thinking has changed. Six months ago, I felt like I understood all of the key variables when it came to the virus & vaccines. And… (2/25)
…when I learned that a variable had changed w/ Delta, I assumed nothing else had.
But now I see that it’s best to assume that nearly every parameter is different – usually for the worse. That creates cognitive vertigo, but it matches the facts on the ground. (see below.)(3/25)