A handful of antidemocratic right-wing libertarian billionaires - not least, Peter Thiel - are primarily concerned with increasing their unimaginable wealth & power, & protecting it from Governments, democracy, & the people.
What's their strategy, & who is Peter Thiel?
Most people know how Big Tobacco denied the link between cancer for decades by deploying 'the dark arts', & most people are aware of how the Koch brothers spent $billions using the same techniques to promote climate change denial & support Right-libertarian political parties.
Most people know that billionaires Rupert Murdoch (Fox News, Times Radio, TalkRadio, Times, Sun (& soon to launch talkTV), the Barclays (Telegraph, Spectator) & Lord Rothermere (Mail) invest heavily in stoking a divisive culture war in order to keep voters distracted & divided.
However, far fewer people know about Peter Thiel (who in terms of individuals rather than ideas) represents of the biggest threats to democracy today.
He's the new darling of the hard/far/libertarian-Right, & he pioneered & got very rich from the ideology of 'disruption'.
A recent book, called The Contrarian, by Max Chafkin, focuses on Peter Thiel.
It reveals the extent of the threat from these individuals to our fragile democracies, & many of the recent developments & techniques resulting in dangerously authoritarian Govts & polarised societies.
This is a short #thread as @moiragweigel's review of Chafkin's book says almost everything I wanted to say.
Thiel pioneered #contrarianism, both as a media strategy & a business strategy: this is crucial to understanding the cultural logic of our time.
The book covers Thiel's formative years, his venture capitalism, & his links to Trump, Zuckerberg & the hard/far/libertarian right, as well as his significant role in the origins of the Silicon Valley culture wars, out of which Thiel has emerged as the best-known figurehead.
Thiel is is a German-American billionaire venture capitalist - a co-founder of PayPal & Palantir Technologies, & the first outside investor in Facebook.
Like the structure of contemporary media, the structure of contemporary venture capital rewards increasingly extreme behavior.
Venture capital investors are not avoiding risk, but managing it: out of every 100 bets, 99 will be wrong, but the one that's right will scale globally, & can pay for the rest & more.
This structure incentivizes more & more outrageous bids, but also maps onto political strategy.
In both the culture wars & investing, contrarianism is presented as heroic.
However, in both cases, if they play their cards right, the contrarian protects themself from risk: be outrageous - it may backfire, but when it works, you can use it to leverage your social capital.
At Stanford University Yhiel founded a magazine of right-wing provocation, which railed against what we would now call "wokeism".
His big successes have come mainly from venture capitalism: eg the early investments that he made in the likes of PayPal, Facebook, Airbnb & Spotify.
A vociferous opponent of 'liberal culture', Thiel was a prominent Trump backer, & is linked to some of Silicon Valley’s wackier concepts eg autonomous sea-based communities, & the anti-ageing therapy parabiosis (“transfusions of blood from young people to older ones”).
Thiel mentored Mark Zuckerberg in the techniques of disruption & libertarianism.
Thiel supported Trump, & found him appealing not only for his political views, but also because his anti-establishment attitude was right in line with how Thiel sees the world.
Peter Thiel is a key player in a global ecosystem of opportunist libertarianism which wants to bypass democracy, funds or supports sympathetic Govts, & invests in contrarian media, with a goal of protecting & enhancing their power by removing human & environmental protections.
There is a “weird personality cult” surrounding Thiel, composed mainly of young, right-wing men. Chafkin’s account suggests that Thiel isn’t a visionary at all, but someone defined only by what he (& other billionaire libertarians) is against: 'liberal elites' & multiculturalism.
Chafkin characterizes Thiel as unable to believe in any basis for human connection other than power, or in relationships that do not boil down to transactions: “Thiel’s life has been full of important relationships, but few that seem to transcend money or power.” Sound familiar?
Peter Thiel is one of the world's most important venture capitalists, with tentacles into everything from MAGA to Facebook to the military-industrial complex.
Max Chafkin's book is a great introduction to who Peter Thiel is, & why we should be very concerned about his influence.
Peter Thiel is of course linked to a wider global network of hard-right libertarians - manifested in the UK in the Tufton St libertarian think tanks - whose dark money poses a threat to democracies across the world - but especially America's & Britain's:
In his co-authored 2014 book 'Zero to One', Thiel emphasises the kind of rule he'd prefer: a heightened vision of what a single leader can do, the veneration for more ancient & direct forms of leadership, the praise for authoritative decision-making, & disdain for bureaucracies.
A network of academics influencing Govt policy on ‘free speech’ in universities is being steered by lobbyists & donors linked to billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel – Chair & co-founder of CIA-backed data analytics giant #Palantir Technologies.
Follow up article from @BylineTimes, warning how the 'free speech in Universities' debate, pushed by the Right, may be being used to rehabilitate Nazi-inspired pseudoscience & enable the uncritical promotion of far-right propaganda at Cambridge University. bylinetimes.com/2021/12/23/cam…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto—digital tokens hiding users’ identities—has enabling “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
In 2023, the hedge fund co-founded by GB "News" owner Paul Marshall, who employs 60% of anti-Net Zero Reform UK's MPs, had £1.8 BILLION invested in fossil fuel firms.
Harborne (who has Thai citizenship under the name 'Chakrit Sakunkrit) also makes money from fossil fuels.
I and countless others are sick to death of the billionaire-funded Reform UK propaganda machine, GB “News”, and their decontextualised ‘facts’ that would make Goebbels blush.
Let’s examine the claim that “one quarter of foreign sex offenders come from just five countries”.
Yes, the raw data comes from a genuine Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison census, but the way it’s being weaponised is deeply misleading.
The statistic sounds explosive, and deliberately so: a factoid engineered to sound like a revelation of hidden danger.
The right-wing information pipeline: a cherry-picked fragment of official data stripped of context, laundered through an opaquely funded “think tank” that isn't a think tank, amplified by billionaire-funded media, and weaponised by opportunistic politicians for electoral gain.
In the September 2025 @SkyNews Immigration Debate, chaired by Trevor “Muslims are not like us” Phillips, Reform UK’s head of policy Zia Yusuf made a series of inaccurate and highly misleading claims about migration, and more recently, on @BBCNewsnight, about social housing.
These assertions are easily disproved with publicly available data, but often go largely unchallenged on air, despite being about some of the most sensitive and polarised issues in politics.
Yusuf started by claiming that UK net migration “last year” was “about a million.”
When a newspaper repeatedly publishes misleading, distorted, or outright inaccurate stories, the public expects independent regulators to step in.
What if I told you the editor responsible for these stories is now in charge of writing the very rules that govern press ethics?
Privately educated Chris Evans, editor of The Daily Telegraph since 2014, has—since January 2024—simultaneously served as Chair of the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice Committee, the body that drafts, reviews, and rewrites the ethical rulebook that the UK press is meant to follow.
Evans holds this regulatory role at a time when his own paper is producing more factual corrections and clarifications than almost any other major UK outlet — with an overwhelming concentration in politically weaponised right-wing themes.
The BBC isn’t perfect — but it’s ours. As coordinated attacks on its independence intensify, I warn that if we don’t defend it now, we may lose more than a broadcaster — we may lose a cornerstone of British democracy...
As a long-time critic of the @BBC, let me spell it out: what we’re seeing right now isn’t organic outrage — it’s a sophisticated coordinated campaign by ideological enemies and commercial competitors to undermine the BBC’s independence and funding.
If you can’t see that, you’re being played — and that’s exactly the point.
Let’s start with Michael Prescott, author of the dodgy dossier leaked exclusively to The Telegraph, who is a PR man and former political editor at Murdoch’s Sunday Times.
Growing numbers of people are angry and disillusioned with the political establishment.
Desperate voters are easy prey for manipulative populists—as they were in Germany in the 1930s.
But the problem isn't immigrants or religious minorities. It's always wealth distribution.
The story of wealth in Britain over the past eight decades since WWII is not one of ‘the invisible hand’, but of deliberate policy choices—choices that once built one of the most equal society in modern history, but now sustain one of the most unequal in the developed world.
Data tracking wealth distribution from 1945 to 2025 reveal a striking U-shaped curve: a rapid reduction in wealth inequality after World War II, making Britain one of the most equal countries on earth by the mid 1970s, followed by an unbroken rise.