🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚛🚛🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨What did you do this Christmas? Lot of small and micro businesses spent it preparing for new post-#Brexit import controls that start Jan 1… GVMS, Rules of Origin proofs, non-deferred customs declarations… etc my latest via @FT /1 on.ft.com/3Jqcnk0
@FT This relates to new controls on imports FROM the EU into the UK, which delayed for a year by the UK government after Jan 1 2021 in order to keep trade flowing into the UK.
In short this is the 'other' side of #brexit .../2
@FT It will apply similar controls as the EU has...so from Jan 1 2021, UK importers will need
a) to complete and clear customs declarations in 'real time' when importing; so no 175 day deferral period
b) for animal products register them on IPAFFs, the UK food import register /3
@FT Although in order to keep the flow, actual physical inspections and the need for veterinary certificates etc won't be needed until July 1...helpful @ft timeline here /4
@FT The phase-in approach should keep the show on the road, but there is one potential early pinch-point which is the GVMS system -- essentially a 'barcode' hauliers need to obtain in order to board ferries to UK, showing that customs/IPAFFs etc all done /5
@FT The Government is pretty confident that this won't be a mega problem -- not least because EU lorry drivers (85% of those crossing short straits) have already been doing it the other way from UK to EU using the similar French "SI Brexit" system.../6
@FT But still, there is uncertainty about how prepared EU hauliers are...many are v small operators.
The guess is that, as in 2021, disruption will be most pushed back to warehouse..but EU hauliers and UK experts like @ColdChainShane reckon several will be playing catch-up /7
@FT@ColdChainShane In practice this will land hardest on the small businesses (on both sides of the Channel) that have least bandwidth and expertise to absorb the process.
A survey by Federation of Small Businesses @fsb_policy found only 25pc were prepared /8
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy A survey from the Institute of Directors @The_IoD , the bosses’ organisation whose members generally represent larger businesses, found one-third were “not at all prepared” for the changes. /9
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD The bigger unknown is the extent to which EU companies that trade with the UK (and have many more options by dint of single market membership) will decide that #Brexit makes it just too much hassle to keep going...and how that impacts UK businesses reliant on EU suppliers. /10
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD Business always finds a way to readjust, but given the UK's role as an intermediate player, particularly in manufacturing, then over time putting UK players at a permanent marginal disadvantage given costs and reliability issues thrown up by red tape, will have impacts. /11
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD Another changing on Jan 1st 2022 is 'rules of origin'...which require exporters to demonstrate their products are about 50 pc 'originating' in the EU or UK in order to get zero-tariff access to each others' markets. The rules deciding if a product 'originates' are v v complex/12
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD Last year businesses had to comply with 'rules of origin' but could self declare their goods were 'originating' and so could enter tariff-free....without having the underlying documents actually to hand, since it is often difficult for suppliers to prove it on complex products/13
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD From Jan 1, UK and EU exporters will still self-declare their goods qualify, but they will need to have the supporting documents -- failure to be able to demonstrate your goods qualify, when challenged by customs authorities, means you'll have to pay the tariff on goods /14
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD That burden falls on the importers -- so take a small shoe shop in Bristol that imports shoes from the EU. If their suppliers is shipping them in from Asia and sending them on the UK, that means tariffs are due...the shoes only 'originate' in the EU if sufficiently made there/15
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD But if the EU suppliers wrongly states the shoes "originate" in the EU...then the Bristol shoe shop is hit with tariff, and then has to work out what the legal situation is with the supplier....all this covered in a letter that HMRC sent out to all businesses/16
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD All this will be good for the freight-forwarding industry, which for a lot of companies will handle the paperwork.
But speaking to these businesses, you can feel their pain. Many get baffled when, even with supplier declarations, duties get charged...and they can't see why /17
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD Again...how much this impacts business will depend to some degree on enforcement. Experts like @SamuelMarcLowe reckon EU authorities likelier to be tougher than UK...which will have political incentive to prioritise flows /18
@FT@ColdChainShane@fsb_policy@The_IoD@SamuelMarcLowe@OBR_UK All that said, don't expect anyone to really notice in the wider world...some businesses will feel pinch, but for consumers this will mean marginally higher prices, less choice, longer delivery times...but as we've seen with #covid19 their tolerance for this is quite high. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺☕️🚛⚙️✈️🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨#Brexit means Brexit. Or if you’re a small company trading into the EU, it means setting up in Netherlands; or if a haulier, giving up on EU business; or fighting to trade with NI.
So starting with Hampstead Teas, run by Kiran Tawadey which sells probiotic teas across the UK, EU and rest of world
On Jan 1 she is shutting down her small Milton Keynes blending and packing plant. Five jobs will go. It's now "too complicated" to run. /2
She already moved her distribution to the Netherlands, so now she can import into EU with single large shipments, clear customs and VAT once and then freely distribute to EU 27.
And now her Oz and Japanese customers want supplying out of the EU also /3
Quick thought on @trussliz appointment to #brexit file is that it’s in principle a ‘good thing’ that it’s back in Foreign Office. Brexit should be seen in context of wider EU relations. Too often it hasn’t.
BUT it will be challenging for her politically…/1
Because as we know the right of the Tory party is in revolt and @DavidGHFrost spent a lot of time pandering to them.
Just three months ago they were being promised Article 16, mutual enforcement and the eradication of the internal border Boris built/2
Frost essentially promised in his Command paper to unwind that mistake. Go back to 2019, mutual enforcement, technology…basically wishing the Irish Trilemma away.
Now he’s walked off, he’ll be there, saying “if only”…usual Brexiter dreaming /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺⚗️🧪👩🔬🥼🧪⚗️👩🔬🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨Post-#Brexit chemicals regime risks UK being a “dumping ground” for toxic substances, warn environmental groups. My @ft latest.
@FT So. This relates to UK chemical regulation after Brexit.
You'll recall that as an EU member the UK followed the EU REACH regulation for chemicals. But after #Brexit we're setting up our own version.
As of Jan 1, we've been free to diverge from EU rules/2
@FT And in one area -- substances of 'very high concern' or SVHCs -- it is now clear that the UK is going to diverge and take a different approach from the EU.
How do we know this? Well, very quietly the UK government slipped out a notice last week. Here/3.
NEW: UK gov is to give biz another two years to adjust to post-#Brexit UK REACH chemicals safety database that industry warned would cost £1bn to needlessly duplicate EU REACH...more encouraging 'pragmatism' /1
This was slipped out y'day (no fanfare, you note) in a letter from George Eustice, environment secretary, to Chemical Industries Association @See_Chem_Bus acknowledging the huge cost of the scheme/2
@See_Chem_Bus Regular readers will recall that back in February, 25 industry bosses wrote to government demanding a radical rethink of the plan to essentially duplicate the EU's REACH safety database...warning it was going to cost £1bn for zero gain /3
EU frustration growing with U.K. not closing deal on medicines. Tactically, though, you can see the U.K. won’t want to hand EU a ‘Win’ in the magnanimity stakes until they’ve got more on customs/borders /1
But at the same time, the Commission isn’t going to move so far on customs/borders until it knows U.K and Frost are serious about a deal within the limits of the Protocol.
We are back to the “who jumps first?” #brexit negotiation conundrum /2
But that itself is made so much harder by the lack of any EU trust in Frost, whose style (from internal market bill move in 2020 onwards) has been all about threat and confrontation. /3
@FT@AJack What's going on? Well, simple really. After #Brexit the new immigration rules did two things:
a) insisted all EU kids had passports (not ID cards) to come to UK and
b) non-EU kids in same class needed full visas
That's a *disaster* for EU school trips industry /2
@FT@AJack So it's not impossible to come to UK...but for a budget trip of a 3-5 days, getting everyone new passports...but worse getting your Afghan, Armenian, Turkish classmates a visa (£95, trip to embassy in Paris/Berlin etc) it just makes it impractical/uneconomic /3