🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚛🚛🚛🇬🇧🇪🇺🚨Regional ports fear unfair #Brexit advantage for Channel rivals…my latest via @FT /1
on.ft.com/31lSF7A
@FT This relates to how the UK government will price its inland inspection sites (at Sevington in Kent and elsewhere) for when physical inspections come into force in July...the Channel Ports (Dover, Folkestone) had not space so didn't have to build border control posts/2
@FT Other UK ports were given £200m through Port Infrastructure Fund to build BCPs (which was a 65% subsidiy in effect) but Major Ports Group chair Charles Hammond tells me regional ports fear there won't be a level playing field /3
@FT They had hoped that #Brexit would bring lots more unaccompanied loads to east coast regional ports...but worry that if UK govt prices inspection sites in Kent too cheaply, it will distort market and wrong incentivise short strait traffic/4
@FT There is an element of special pleading in this -- the UK govt makes point that £200m is a lot of money and ports anyway had legal responsibility to provide facilities/5
@FT Dover says that it isn't its problem, since it is essentially "just a piece of road" that trucks pass through...and how government recovers costs from building Sevingtong/Dover White Cliffs etc is the governments business/6
@FT But this points to a thorny issue for the government, which is due to announce its prices "in the New Year" -- ie soon -- and these will benchmark the other ports, in practice. /7
@FT The difficulty (as always with #Brexit borders) is that applying the same processes as you use for low-intensity, long-sea trade (shipping containers from Asia or USA) doesn't work so well with high-intensity/ro-ro trade with EU, where 50% of UK imports come from /8
@FT The fact that it's taken govt so long to come up with a pricing structure (when ports need to be able to tell clients at least a quarter ahead of time) is testament to how this particular hot potato has been passed round Whitehall, despite external help from consultants /9
@FT Be one to watch in the coming weeks as to how the government plays it.

FWIW, I hear that privately, several port operators now wish they'd never bothered to build their own BCPs. 10/ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Foster

Peter Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pmdfoster

29 Dec 21
🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚛🚛🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨What did you do this Christmas? Lot of small and micro businesses spent it preparing for new post-#Brexit import controls that start Jan 1… GVMS, Rules of Origin proofs, non-deferred customs declarations… etc my latest via @FT /1
on.ft.com/3Jqcnk0
@FT This relates to new controls on imports FROM the EU into the UK, which delayed for a year by the UK government after Jan 1 2021 in order to keep trade flowing into the UK.

In short this is the 'other' side of #brexit .../2
@FT It will apply similar controls as the EU has...so from Jan 1 2021, UK importers will need

a) to complete and clear customs declarations in 'real time' when importing; so no 175 day deferral period

b) for animal products register them on IPAFFs, the UK food import register /3
Read 20 tweets
21 Dec 21
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺☕️🚛⚙️✈️🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨#Brexit means Brexit. Or if you’re a small company trading into the EU, it means setting up in Netherlands; or if a haulier, giving up on EU business; or fighting to trade with NI.

Three small UK companies reflect on Year One /1
on.ft.com/3GYWHSx
So starting with Hampstead Teas, run by Kiran Tawadey which sells probiotic teas across the UK, EU and rest of world

On Jan 1 she is shutting down her small Milton Keynes blending and packing plant. Five jobs will go. It's now "too complicated" to run. /2
She already moved her distribution to the Netherlands, so now she can import into EU with single large shipments, clear customs and VAT once and then freely distribute to EU 27.

And now her Oz and Japanese customers want supplying out of the EU also /3
Read 15 tweets
20 Dec 21
Quick thought on @trussliz appointment to #brexit file is that it’s in principle a ‘good thing’ that it’s back in Foreign Office. Brexit should be seen in context of wider EU relations. Too often it hasn’t.

BUT it will be challenging for her politically…/1
Because as we know the right of the Tory party is in revolt and @DavidGHFrost spent a lot of time pandering to them.

Just three months ago they were being promised Article 16, mutual enforcement and the eradication of the internal border Boris built/2
Frost essentially promised in his Command paper to unwind that mistake. Go back to 2019, mutual enforcement, technology…basically wishing the Irish Trilemma away.

Now he’s walked off, he’ll be there, saying “if only”…usual Brexiter dreaming /3
Read 8 tweets
16 Dec 21
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺⚗️🧪👩‍🔬🥼🧪⚗️👩‍🔬🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨Post-#Brexit chemicals regime risks UK being a “dumping ground” for toxic substances, warn environmental groups. My @ft latest.

Stay with me. This is an important story. /1
ft.com/content/32e6d8…
@FT So. This relates to UK chemical regulation after Brexit.

You'll recall that as an EU member the UK followed the EU REACH regulation for chemicals. But after #Brexit we're setting up our own version.

As of Jan 1, we've been free to diverge from EU rules/2
@FT And in one area -- substances of 'very high concern' or SVHCs -- it is now clear that the UK is going to diverge and take a different approach from the EU.

How do we know this? Well, very quietly the UK government slipped out a notice last week. Here/3.

gov.uk/government/pub…
Read 21 tweets
7 Dec 21
NEW: UK gov is to give biz another two years to adjust to post-#Brexit UK REACH chemicals safety database that industry warned would cost £1bn to needlessly duplicate EU REACH...more encouraging 'pragmatism' /1

ft.com/content/199276…
This was slipped out y'day (no fanfare, you note) in a letter from George Eustice, environment secretary, to Chemical Industries Association @See_Chem_Bus acknowledging the huge cost of the scheme/2

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
@See_Chem_Bus Regular readers will recall that back in February, 25 industry bosses wrote to government demanding a radical rethink of the plan to essentially duplicate the EU's REACH safety database...warning it was going to cost £1bn for zero gain /3

ft.com/content/b28a44…
Read 11 tweets
2 Dec 21
EU frustration growing with U.K. not closing deal on medicines. Tactically, though, you can see the U.K. won’t want to hand EU a ‘Win’ in the magnanimity stakes until they’ve got more on customs/borders /1
But at the same time, the Commission isn’t going to move so far on customs/borders until it knows U.K and Frost are serious about a deal within the limits of the Protocol.

We are back to the “who jumps first?” #brexit negotiation conundrum /2
But that itself is made so much harder by the lack of any EU trust in Frost, whose style (from internal market bill move in 2020 onwards) has been all about threat and confrontation. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(