GMWatch Profile picture
10 Jan, 4 tweets, 3 min read
This @chicagotribune editorial bends over backwards to say #GMOs are fab (claiming they do all kinds of things they've never managed, and that they've been eaten safely "for generations"!!) in the course of saying USDA's new #GMO labeling is a pile of💩 chicagotribune.com/opinion/editor…
@chicagotribune A straightforward mandate to better inform the public has been turned into a complicated decision tree only a bureaucrat could love. The govt has replaced the commonly used terms “genetically modified” & #GMO. Instead, food manufacturers are required to use “bioengineered” or BE.
@chicagotribune The USDA's “bioengineered” or BE labels are supposed to disclose ingredients “derived from biotechnology” or “ingredients derived from a bioengineered source.” Yet refined products can dodge ANY disclosure via "a loophole you could drive a tractor through", says @chicagotribune
@chicagotribune USDA's new #GMO labeling regs don't apply to meat, poultry or eggs. No disclosure is required if the first ingredient of a processed food is 1 of these, even if the second and/or other ingredient(s) are GMO. So a processed product can be stuffed with #GMOs without ANY disclosure!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GMWatch

GMWatch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GMWatch

31 Oct 21
New book on #COVID-19 origins was plagued by censorship; concludes "overwhelming" evidence that virus was genetically engineered lab escape gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Image
Our review includes exclusive interviews with two of the authors, investigative journalist Paolo Barnard and Prof Angus Dalgleish, about their experiences of censorship over #COVID19 & the lab origin theory, and how that played out in relation to their new book. ImageImage
Paolo B. says when he was looking for scientist co-authors for the book they told him "dissent in writing is career-threatening" and "just be aware Fauci & NIH is a no-go area for this book. My total funding for the last 15 years has been from NIH and similarly into the future.." Image
Read 5 tweets
25 Sep 21
Seed monopolies: Who controls the world's food supply? dw.com/en/agriculture… Seed laws criminalizing farmers for using diverse crops that stand a better chance of adapting to climate change are threatening food security
For thousands of years of human agriculture, seeds were freely exchanged and shared. All that changed in the 1990s when laws were introduced to protect new #GMO crops. Today, 4 corporations — @Bayer, Corteva, ChemChina and Limagrain — control more than 50% of the world's seeds. Image
@Bayer Most countries only allow patents—exclusive ownership rights that weren't originally created with living organisms in mind—on #GMO seeds. But other plant varieties can also be strictly controlled by another type of intellectual property legislation called Plant Variety Protection Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Aug 21
Study finds link between glyphosate exposure and shorter pregnancy length, which can increase babies' risk of long-term health problems ehn.org/study-finds-li… Confirms earlier research which also found shorter pregnancies more likely
Latest study follows 2 others on glyphosate & pregnancy length, including 1 in Indiana that found women with higher #glyphosate levels were more likely to have shorter pregnancies, which can increase the risk of infant mortality, long-term health challenges & intellectual delays.
The study raises questions about potential effects of even low-dose exposures to glyphosate among the general population, since the study found shorter pregnancies were linked to #glyphosate levels in the women's bodies that were well below current US regulatory thresholds.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jul 21
Brilliant interview with @careygillam on the nuts & bolts of agriculture & pesticide disinformation disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… Carey's just been blocked by corporate sponsors of a big ag media event from talking to fellow journalists about how to investigate stories using FOIA
@careygillam Carey says corporate money is at play in journalism conferences and gives example of how @Bayer—in exchange for v generous donations—positioned itself to not just set agendas for journalistic conferences but get a say in what kind of stories are applauded and promoted via awards.
@careygillam @Bayer Carey & @thackerpd also discuss the evidence of Monsanto's targeting of journalists & scientists via front groups & other third parties. One group targeting Carey et al was told, “The key will be keeping #Monsanto in the background so as not to harm the credibility of the info.”
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul 21
New York Times Magazine publishes false and misleading statements in pro-GMO fairytale gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… And the resurrected #GMO purple tomato takes centre stage
To conjure up its fairytale @NYTmag ignores much of the reality of GMO crops. As @Nathan_Donley notes, there's only passing mention of #Monsanto et al & the destruction caused by their herbicide-promoting GMO crops, grown on hundreds of millions of acres—never mind seed patenting
@NYTmag @Nathan_Donley .@NYTmag also makes no mention of #dicamba-tolerant GMO crops. "How can you have a serious discussion about genetic engineering and ignore the livelihoods and habitats that have been irreversibly destroyed throughout the Midwest and South in the last 5 years?" asks @Nathan_Donley
Read 8 tweets
15 Apr 21
The future of agricultural gene editing: More herbicide-tolerant crops sooner gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Scientists look forward to crops that can be sprayed with multiple herbicides and evade risk assessment! #NewGMO
1st generation GMO crops were supposed to cut pesticide use. They didn't. In fact 87% of current GMO crops are engineered for herbicide tolerance. Now GMO promoters claim gene editing will save us from pesticide use. But a new paper spells out why it'll be *even more* of the same
If govts deregulate gene edited crops, then they can be developed faster & more profitably, and be easily hidden from consumers. This will help more *multi*-herbicide tolerant crops hit the market "years earlier", scientists say in a new paper. And they think that's a good thing!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(