Brilliant interview with @careygillam on the nuts & bolts of agriculture & pesticide disinformation disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… Carey's just been blocked by corporate sponsors of a big ag media event from talking to fellow journalists about how to investigate stories using FOIA
@careygillam Carey says corporate money is at play in journalism conferences and gives example of how @Bayer—in exchange for v generous donations—positioned itself to not just set agendas for journalistic conferences but get a say in what kind of stories are applauded and promoted via awards.
@careygillam@Bayer Carey & @thackerpd also discuss the evidence of Monsanto's targeting of journalists & scientists via front groups & other third parties. One group targeting Carey et al was told, “The key will be keeping #Monsanto in the background so as not to harm the credibility of the info.”
@careygillam@Bayer@thackerpd "Monsanto had a v structured campaign to bring science writers into the fold & direct what they're writing." Docs show how a Reuters reporter got direction from #Monsanto—& a Monsanto consultant—to write negative stories about @WHO after it said Roundup was a probable carcinogen.
@careygillam@Bayer@thackerpd@WHO#Monsanto got the Reuters journo "to write what they asked her to write, internal Monsanto documents show. She even sent them a draft of one of her stories before it was published, which we were not allowed to do at Reuters." GMW: The journo won an award for 1 of those stories!🤦
@careygillam@Bayer@thackerpd@WHO Journalists garnering favour with big firms "happens a lot.. A lot of career benefits can come from cozying up to very large & powerful companies. They can feed you the stories and breaking news, and get you access to top execs that make you look good in front of your editors."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New York Times Magazine publishes false and misleading statements in pro-GMO fairytale gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… And the resurrected #GMO purple tomato takes centre stage
To conjure up its fairytale @NYTmag ignores much of the reality of GMO crops. As @Nathan_Donley notes, there's only passing mention of #Monsanto et al & the destruction caused by their herbicide-promoting GMO crops, grown on hundreds of millions of acres—never mind seed patenting
@NYTmag@Nathan_Donley .@NYTmag also makes no mention of #dicamba-tolerant GMO crops. "How can you have a serious discussion about genetic engineering and ignore the livelihoods and habitats that have been irreversibly destroyed throughout the Midwest and South in the last 5 years?" asks @Nathan_Donley
The future of agricultural gene editing: More herbicide-tolerant crops sooner gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Scientists look forward to crops that can be sprayed with multiple herbicides and evade risk assessment! #NewGMO
1st generation GMO crops were supposed to cut pesticide use. They didn't. In fact 87% of current GMO crops are engineered for herbicide tolerance. Now GMO promoters claim gene editing will save us from pesticide use. But a new paper spells out why it'll be *even more* of the same
If govts deregulate gene edited crops, then they can be developed faster & more profitably, and be easily hidden from consumers. This will help more *multi*-herbicide tolerant crops hit the market "years earlier", scientists say in a new paper. And they think that's a good thing!
A key reason gene editing shouldn't be deregulated is all the hype about its precision & accuracy is BS. Even Harvard's George Church calls #CRISPR "a blunt axe". He says, "it's called editing, I think it's really genome vandalism." Yet the Govt thinks it needs no safety checks!
More & more studies in human, animal & plant cells show gene editing gives rise to numerous genetic errors (aka unintended mutations—DNA damage) at both off-target sites & on-target (at the desired editing site). These include large deletions, insertions & rearrangements of DNA.
A commentary in the journal Nature noted that a suite of studies had found #CRISPR gene-editing in human embryos "wreaks chromosomal mayhem". This included large, unwanted changes to the genome that the journal said could be missed in many experiments nature.com/articles/d4158…#gmo
#Glyphosate and Roundup disturb gut microbiome and blood biochemistry at doses that regulators claim to be safe gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… New study reveals evidence for potential cancer-causing damage
Study proved #glyphosate disrupts gut microbiome thru same route it kills weeds — inhibition of shikimate pathway. Humans & animals do not have the shikimate pathway, but some strains of gut bacteria do, leading to dramatic biochemical changes & oxidative stress, the study found.
.@careygillam has done a very interesting interview regarding the new gut microbiome study with two of its authors, Dr Michael Antoniou & Dr Robin Mesnage of the Dept of Medical and Molecular Genetics at King’s College London #Roundup#glyphosate
Landmark Agent Orange court case against agrochemical giants gets underway gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Could #Monsanto finally be forced to acknowledge responsibility for the millions harmed? Rally this Saturday in support of #JusticePourTranToNga and all the victims of Agent Orange!
Background: @Bayer's embroiled in multiple lawsuits in the US where as well as struggling to settle tens of thousands of Roundup-cancer claims, it's also facing #dicamba lawsuits and PCB lawsuits. It's also being sued by its own shareholders for not foreseeing all these lawsuits!
@Bayer In France Bayer lost a long legal fight involving another #Monsanto herbicide. It's also battling the @sabine_38 family, who are seeking to create a legal precedent to assist families with children that have been harmed by Roundup, like Théo, who was born with major birth defects
Daszak facing calls to step down from Covid-19 inquiries as WHO team arrives in Wuhan gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Scientist who channelled cash for risky #coronavirus research still key player in #COVID19 investigations
While some scientists say a thorough scientific audit of the Wuhan labs should be routine for investigators, Daszak dismisses that possibility as "anti-China rhetoric" and "not what happens". Here's @R_H_Rbright's comment
Daszak not only funded risky bat #coronavirus research in Wuhan but orchestrated the branding of any suggestions of a lab-leak as “conspiracy theories”. Daszak's also a long-term friend and collaborator (as well as funder!) of the Wuhan lab he'll now supposedly be investigating.