Seed monopolies: Who controls the world's food supply? dw.com/en/agriculture… Seed laws criminalizing farmers for using diverse crops that stand a better chance of adapting to climate change are threatening food security
For thousands of years of human agriculture, seeds were freely exchanged and shared. All that changed in the 1990s when laws were introduced to protect new #GMO crops. Today, 4 corporations — @Bayer, Corteva, ChemChina and Limagrain — control more than 50% of the world's seeds.
@Bayer Most countries only allow patents—exclusive ownership rights that weren't originally created with living organisms in mind—on #GMO seeds. But other plant varieties can also be strictly controlled by another type of intellectual property legislation called Plant Variety Protection
@Bayer Critics say imposing uniform seed rules on a global scale means forcing industrial farming onto parts of the world where food is still largely produced by smaller-scale more sustainable farms. "We're looking at this as neocolonialism destroying our livelihoods & our environment."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Study finds link between glyphosate exposure and shorter pregnancy length, which can increase babies' risk of long-term health problems ehn.org/study-finds-li… Confirms earlier research which also found shorter pregnancies more likely
Latest study follows 2 others on glyphosate & pregnancy length, including 1 in Indiana that found women with higher #glyphosate levels were more likely to have shorter pregnancies, which can increase the risk of infant mortality, long-term health challenges & intellectual delays.
The study raises questions about potential effects of even low-dose exposures to glyphosate among the general population, since the study found shorter pregnancies were linked to #glyphosate levels in the women's bodies that were well below current US regulatory thresholds.
Brilliant interview with @careygillam on the nuts & bolts of agriculture & pesticide disinformation disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… Carey's just been blocked by corporate sponsors of a big ag media event from talking to fellow journalists about how to investigate stories using FOIA
@careygillam Carey says corporate money is at play in journalism conferences and gives example of how @Bayer—in exchange for v generous donations—positioned itself to not just set agendas for journalistic conferences but get a say in what kind of stories are applauded and promoted via awards.
@careygillam@Bayer Carey & @thackerpd also discuss the evidence of Monsanto's targeting of journalists & scientists via front groups & other third parties. One group targeting Carey et al was told, “The key will be keeping #Monsanto in the background so as not to harm the credibility of the info.”
New York Times Magazine publishes false and misleading statements in pro-GMO fairytale gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… And the resurrected #GMO purple tomato takes centre stage
To conjure up its fairytale @NYTmag ignores much of the reality of GMO crops. As @Nathan_Donley notes, there's only passing mention of #Monsanto et al & the destruction caused by their herbicide-promoting GMO crops, grown on hundreds of millions of acres—never mind seed patenting
@NYTmag@Nathan_Donley .@NYTmag also makes no mention of #dicamba-tolerant GMO crops. "How can you have a serious discussion about genetic engineering and ignore the livelihoods and habitats that have been irreversibly destroyed throughout the Midwest and South in the last 5 years?" asks @Nathan_Donley
The future of agricultural gene editing: More herbicide-tolerant crops sooner gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… Scientists look forward to crops that can be sprayed with multiple herbicides and evade risk assessment! #NewGMO
1st generation GMO crops were supposed to cut pesticide use. They didn't. In fact 87% of current GMO crops are engineered for herbicide tolerance. Now GMO promoters claim gene editing will save us from pesticide use. But a new paper spells out why it'll be *even more* of the same
If govts deregulate gene edited crops, then they can be developed faster & more profitably, and be easily hidden from consumers. This will help more *multi*-herbicide tolerant crops hit the market "years earlier", scientists say in a new paper. And they think that's a good thing!
A key reason gene editing shouldn't be deregulated is all the hype about its precision & accuracy is BS. Even Harvard's George Church calls #CRISPR "a blunt axe". He says, "it's called editing, I think it's really genome vandalism." Yet the Govt thinks it needs no safety checks!
More & more studies in human, animal & plant cells show gene editing gives rise to numerous genetic errors (aka unintended mutations—DNA damage) at both off-target sites & on-target (at the desired editing site). These include large deletions, insertions & rearrangements of DNA.
A commentary in the journal Nature noted that a suite of studies had found #CRISPR gene-editing in human embryos "wreaks chromosomal mayhem". This included large, unwanted changes to the genome that the journal said could be missed in many experiments nature.com/articles/d4158…#gmo
#Glyphosate and Roundup disturb gut microbiome and blood biochemistry at doses that regulators claim to be safe gmwatch.org/en/news/latest… New study reveals evidence for potential cancer-causing damage
Study proved #glyphosate disrupts gut microbiome thru same route it kills weeds — inhibition of shikimate pathway. Humans & animals do not have the shikimate pathway, but some strains of gut bacteria do, leading to dramatic biochemical changes & oxidative stress, the study found.
.@careygillam has done a very interesting interview regarding the new gut microbiome study with two of its authors, Dr Michael Antoniou & Dr Robin Mesnage of the Dept of Medical and Molecular Genetics at King’s College London #Roundup#glyphosate